22.01.2015 Views

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 th <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Workshop</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> <strong>Densitometry</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> Cancer Risk Assessment<br />

P2 COMPARISON OF BREAST DENSITY MEASUREMENTS WITH A<br />

MAMMOGRAPHIC VOLUMETRIC AND AREA ALGORITHM AND MAGNETIC<br />

RESONANCE IMAGING<br />

O Al<strong>on</strong>zo-Proulx 1 , J Mainprize 1 , E. Warner 1 , J. Harvey 2 , M. Yaffe 1<br />

1 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Tor<strong>on</strong>to, Ontario Canada, M4N 3M5 ;<br />

2 University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong>: Area <strong>and</strong> volumetric breast density (ABD <strong>and</strong> VBD) is typically determined from twodimensi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

x-ray projecti<strong>on</strong> mammograms. In this study we compare the values of ABD, VBD, dense<br />

volume <strong>and</strong> total breast volume estimated in this way, with measurements obtained directly from a threedimensi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

breast MRI image dataset.<br />

ABSTRACTS<br />

Materials <strong>and</strong> Methods: Our VBD algorithm, CUMULUS V, has been described earlier [1,2]. A<br />

calibrati<strong>on</strong> surface relating the imaging signal to the compositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> thickness of breast phantoms is<br />

obtained experimentally, <strong>and</strong> corrected using simulati<strong>on</strong> to compensate for the attenuati<strong>on</strong> difference<br />

between the phantom materials <strong>and</strong> breast tissue. The resp<strong>on</strong>se of the thickness readout of the<br />

mammography machine is characterized to allow for an accurate estimate of the breast thickness under<br />

compressi<strong>on</strong>. The ABD measurements were d<strong>on</strong>e using the CUMULUS area algorithm. The MR images<br />

were obtained from a study of high-risk women [3]. The images were segmented in four steps. 1) the<br />

inhomogeneities arising from the coil sensitivity were corrected semi-automatically in each slice; 2) a<br />

user delineated the chest wall <strong>and</strong> air boundaries; 3) a user manually selected the signal peaks due to fatty<br />

<strong>and</strong> fibrogl<strong>and</strong>ular tissue; 4) a soft-threshold functi<strong>on</strong> was applied between the peaks to transform the<br />

image into fracti<strong>on</strong>al density c<strong>on</strong>tent. Images from 80 patients (left <strong>and</strong> right breast) were analyzed in this<br />

study.<br />

Results: The digital mammograms were obtained, <strong>on</strong> average, 3 years after the MR exam, when the mean<br />

age of the women was 45 years. Figure 1 <strong>and</strong> Table 1 compare the mammography <strong>and</strong> MR measurements.<br />

The mean VBD <strong>and</strong> volumes were 32.3 % <strong>and</strong> 677 cm 3 , respectively, for the mammography measurement<br />

versus 32.3 % <strong>and</strong> 645 cm 3 for the MR measurement. The comparis<strong>on</strong> with ABD has not been completed<br />

at this point.<br />

Figure 1: comparis<strong>on</strong> between the mammographic density algorithm <strong>and</strong> MRI for the VBD (left) <strong>and</strong> breast<br />

volume (right).<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!