22.01.2015 Views

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 th <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Workshop</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> <strong>Densitometry</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> Cancer Risk Assessment<br />

P48<br />

A FULLY-AUTOMATED METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING FIBROGLANDULAR<br />

TISSUE AND BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT IN BREAST MRI<br />

Sh<strong>and</strong><strong>on</strong>g Wu, Susan P. Weinstein, Emily F. C<strong>on</strong>ant, Despina K<strong>on</strong>tos<br />

Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA USA<br />

Purpose: The goal is to provide a methodological framework for automated quantitative analysis of the<br />

fibrogl<strong>and</strong>ular tissue (FGT) <strong>and</strong> background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in breast magnetic<br />

res<strong>on</strong>ance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer risk assessment <strong>and</strong> risk reducti<strong>on</strong> interventi<strong>on</strong>s in high-risk<br />

women.<br />

Background: <strong>Breast</strong> MRI provides 3D scanning <strong>and</strong> therefore can eliminate the tissue superpositi<strong>on</strong><br />

problem in mammography. Recent studies suggest that FGT <strong>and</strong> BPE are associated with breast cancer<br />

risk assessment, specifically for high-risk women. However, currently FGT <strong>and</strong> BPE are mainly evaluated<br />

qualitatively by visual assessment, which suffers from subjective results <strong>and</strong> inter- <strong>and</strong> intra-reader<br />

variability.<br />

ABSTRACTS<br />

Method: Our fully automated method for quantifying FGT <strong>and</strong> BPE includes three steps (Fig. 1). First,<br />

an integrated scheme of synergistic edge extracti<strong>on</strong> has been developed to detect chest wall line so that<br />

segment the whole breast. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, the FGT is estimated based <strong>on</strong> our proposed fuzzy-c-means (FCM)-<br />

Atlas method. Third, BPE is estimated through identifying the enhancing voxels in the DCE subtracti<strong>on</strong><br />

(sub) images by measuring the relative intensity change relative to the intensity in the pre-c<strong>on</strong>trast (pre)<br />

images. We define an enhancement ratio R = Intensity_sub / Intensity_pre × 100 <strong>and</strong> the voxels that have<br />

a greater value than a predefined threshold are identified as the enhancing voxels. Based <strong>on</strong> the<br />

segmentati<strong>on</strong>, we compute four measures: absolute volume of FGT (|FGT|), percentage of |FGT| relative<br />

to the whole breast volume (FGT%), absolute volume of BPE (|BPE|), <strong>and</strong> percentage of |BPE| relative to<br />

the whole breast volume (BPE%). Our method has been evaluated using a representative dataset of 60<br />

bilateral breast MRI scans (120 breasts) through comparing to the manual segmentati<strong>on</strong> obtained from<br />

two experienced breast imaging radiologists by using our customized user-interactive software<br />

(“MRwizard V.1.0”).<br />

Results: The inter-reader Pears<strong>on</strong> correlati<strong>on</strong> coefficient (r) is 0.95 for FGT% <strong>and</strong> 0.96 for |FGT|. When<br />

compared to the average of the two readers, the proposed FGT segmentati<strong>on</strong> method achieves a<br />

correlati<strong>on</strong> of r=0.88 for FGT% <strong>and</strong> r=0.84 for |FGT|; the bilateral correlati<strong>on</strong> between left breasts <strong>and</strong><br />

right breasts is r=0.90 for FGT% <strong>and</strong> r=0.86 for |FGT|. For BPE-related measures, the inter-reader<br />

correlati<strong>on</strong> is r=0.80 for |BPE | <strong>and</strong> r=0.78 for BPE%, respectively. We parameterize the enhancement<br />

ratio threshold ranging from 0% to 200% <strong>and</strong> the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding BPE is estimated. It is found that there is<br />

a range, i.e., 30% - 80%, rather than a single value of the enhancement ratio that high correlati<strong>on</strong>s (r = 0.8<br />

to 0.9) are achieved between the automated BPE estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> the manual segmentati<strong>on</strong> in terms of the<br />

4 BPE-related measures (i.e., |BPE| <strong>and</strong> BPE% by 2 readers). Our fully automated method runs timeefficiently<br />

at ~5 minute for each 3D MR scan (56 slices), compared to ~65 minutes needed for the manual<br />

segmentati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s: We have developed <strong>and</strong> validated a fully automated method for quantifying FGT <strong>and</strong> BPE<br />

in breast MRI. It has been used successfully as a quantitative imaging biomarker for assessing the<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>se of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutati<strong>on</strong> carriers <strong>and</strong> can also be used to<br />

support other clinical applicati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!