22.01.2015 Views

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

6th International Workshop on Breast Densitometry and Breast ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P8<br />

6 th <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Workshop</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> <strong>Densitometry</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> Cancer Risk Assessment<br />

MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY AND RISK OF BREAST CANCER BY AGE AND<br />

TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Kimberly A. Bertr<strong>and</strong> 1,2 , Rulla M. Tamimi 1,2 , Christopher G. Scott 3 , Matthew R. Jensen 3 , V. Shane<br />

Pankratz 3 , Daniel Visscher 4 , Aar<strong>on</strong> Norman 5 , Fergus Couch 5,6, , John Shepherd 7 , Bo Fan 7 , Yunn-Yi Chen 8 ,<br />

Lin Ma 9 , Andrew H. Beck, 10 Walter C. Willett, 1,2,11 Steven R. Cummings, 12 Karla Kerlikowske 13 , Celine<br />

M. Vach<strong>on</strong> 5<br />

ABSTRACTS<br />

1 Channing Divisi<strong>on</strong> of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham <strong>and</strong> Women’s Hospital <strong>and</strong><br />

Harvard Medical School, Bost<strong>on</strong>, MA; 2 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health,<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong>, MA; 3 Divisi<strong>on</strong> of Biomedical Statistics <strong>and</strong> Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,<br />

Rochester, MN; 4 Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN;<br />

5 Department of Health Sciences Research, Divisi<strong>on</strong> of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,<br />

Rochester, MN; 6 Department of Experimental Pathology <strong>and</strong> Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic College<br />

of Medicine, Rochester, MN; 7 Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA;<br />

8 Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; 9 Department of Medicine,<br />

University of California, San Francisco, CA; 10 Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deac<strong>on</strong>ess Medical<br />

Center <strong>and</strong> Harvard Medical School, Bost<strong>on</strong>, MA; 11 Department of Nutriti<strong>on</strong>, Harvard School of Public<br />

Health, Bost<strong>on</strong>, MA; 12 San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research<br />

Institute; 13 Departments of Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> Biostatistics <strong>and</strong> General Internal Medicine Secti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco, CA<br />

Background: Evidence <strong>on</strong> the associati<strong>on</strong> between mammographic density (MD) <strong>and</strong> breast cancer<br />

according to age <strong>and</strong> morphologic/histologic characteristics of tumors is mixed. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing whether<br />

MD is associated with all breast tumor subtypes <strong>and</strong> whether the strength of associati<strong>on</strong> varies by age is<br />

important prior to utilizing MD in risk models.<br />

Methods: Data were pooled from six cohort or case-c<strong>on</strong>trol studies including 3414 women with breast<br />

cancer <strong>and</strong> 7199 without who underwent screening mammography. Percent MD was assessed from<br />

digitized film-screen mammograms using a computer-assisted threshold technique. We used polytomous<br />

logistic regressi<strong>on</strong> to calculate the odds of breast cancer according to tumor type, histopathological<br />

characteristics <strong>and</strong> receptor (ER, PR, HER2) status by age (51%) vs. average density (11-25%). Women ages 2.1 cm) vs. smaller (0.1-1 cm <strong>and</strong> 1.1-2 cm) tumor size<br />

<strong>and</strong> positive vs. negative lymph node status (P trend

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!