23.01.2015 Views

United States Distance Learning Association

United States Distance Learning Association

United States Distance Learning Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lab assistant’s room beside the classroom<br />

and can see the students<br />

through a window.<br />

Before the face-to-face session, instructional<br />

materials and Live Classroom procedures<br />

were uploaded in the WebCT course<br />

for the students (see Appendix A). Procedural<br />

checklists were distributed to the faculty<br />

(see Appendix B). CLTT Developers<br />

and technical help were available to be<br />

with the students and the instructor for<br />

these face-to-face sessions.<br />

Both instructors ran two face-to-face<br />

sessions. Following that, the senior faculty<br />

member felt competent to run her class virtually<br />

off-site. The other faculty member<br />

continued to meet with her class face-toface<br />

and used Live Classroom to bring in<br />

the foreign student.<br />

It was hoped that these two faculty<br />

members could be influential in the diffusion<br />

process for this technology. They did a<br />

presentation of their experiences in a luncheon<br />

forum for 40 faculty and continue to<br />

use the platform themselves. In addition,<br />

CLTT delivers a 6-week online training session<br />

for faculty who are going to teach<br />

fully online and Live Classroom is incorporated<br />

into this course. Over 50 faculty have<br />

completed the course over the past year.<br />

Despite the presentation and the online<br />

training, only five faculty members have<br />

adopted Live Classroom over the course of<br />

the year. Three of the faculty use it for fully<br />

online courses and two faculty members<br />

use it for recording and archiving their<br />

face-to-face sessions. A more systematic<br />

approach using diffusion theory may have<br />

contributed to a faster rate of adoption<br />

among faculty at the university.<br />

an innovation, communication channels,<br />

time, and a social system.<br />

INNOVATION<br />

According to Rogers (1995) the rate of<br />

adoption of an innovation is based upon<br />

the perceived characteristics of the innovation.<br />

In other words, the innovation could<br />

be beneficial, but if it is not perceived as<br />

such, will not be adopted. These characteristics<br />

are categorized as relative advantage,<br />

compatibility, complexity, trialability, and<br />

observability.<br />

RELATIVE ADVANTAGE<br />

For the two faculty members in this<br />

pilot, the relative advantage of using this<br />

technology was to connect an international<br />

student to their face-to-face group. The<br />

senior faculty member realized that this<br />

would also benefit her students as they<br />

were working full-time jobs and they<br />

would appreciate not having to come onsite<br />

to classes. She was receptive to the idea<br />

of having regularly scheduled virtual<br />

evening classes.<br />

The junior faculty member was not<br />

ready to take that step and she felt more<br />

comfortable in the face-to-face environment.<br />

She said “This was my first time<br />

teaching a graduate class and I did not<br />

want to abandon my students.” She felt<br />

that there was a disadvantage to her students<br />

in doing these virtual sessions. Interestingly<br />

she did move to a fully online<br />

environment the next semester. This might<br />

be the result of her own comfort level and<br />

her realization that she could still interact<br />

with her students and was not in any way<br />

abandoning them.<br />

DIFFUSION THEORY<br />

Rogers (1976) defines diffusion as “the process<br />

in which an innovation is communicated<br />

through certain channels over time<br />

among members of a social system” (p. 5).<br />

The concept contains four main elements:<br />

COMPATIBILITY<br />

Rogers (1995) defines compatibility as<br />

the perception of the innovation in relation<br />

to existing values, experiences, and needs<br />

of the potential adopters. In the case of the<br />

junior faculty member, she recalled her<br />

50 <strong>Distance</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> Volume 4, Issue 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!