27.01.2015 Views

PCT Yearly Review - WIPO

PCT Yearly Review - WIPO

PCT Yearly Review - WIPO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section b<br />

performance of the pct system<br />

B.5.4 Timeliness in transmitting IPRPs by time<br />

category and IPEA<br />

Figure B.5.4 presents the same timeliness information<br />

for 2012 as in figures B.5.2 and B.5.3, but provides a<br />

breakdown by IPEA.<br />

In 2012, the offices of Spain, Sweden and Japan transmitted,<br />

respectively, 97.2%, 91.2% and 91.1% of IPRPs within<br />

28 months from the priority date of the application; whereas<br />

the USPTO, the offices of Austria and Canada transmitted,<br />

respectively, 63.9%, 38.5% and 34.3% of IPRPs later<br />

than 32 months from the priority date of the application.<br />

Figure B.5.4: Timeliness in transmitting IPRPs to the IB by delay and IPEA, 2012<br />

Within 28 months Between 29 - 30 months Between 31 - 32 months More than 32 months<br />

Distribution by time category (%)<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

97.2 91.2 91.1 84.3 78.9 74.4 72.8 69.6 66.7 61.0 44.3 36.7 30.8 25.2<br />

Share of IPRPs transmitted within 28 months (%)<br />

Spain<br />

Sweden<br />

Japan<br />

China<br />

Nordic Patent Institute<br />

European Patent Office<br />

Australia<br />

Finland<br />

Brazil<br />

International Preliminary Examining Authority<br />

Russian Federation<br />

Canada<br />

Republic of Korea<br />

Austria<br />

United States of America<br />

Note: Timeliness is calculated as the time elapsed between the priority date and the date on which the IB received the IPRP from the IPEA.<br />

Source: <strong>WIPO</strong> Statistics Database, March 2013<br />

B.6<br />

<strong>PCT</strong>-PPH Pilots<br />

Use of the <strong>PCT</strong>-Patent Prosecution Highway (<strong>PCT</strong>-PPH)<br />

pilots enables applicants, where a favorable written opinion<br />

or IPRP has been issued by the participating ISA and/<br />

or IPEA, to fast-track patent examination procedures in<br />

the national phase and, generally, to obtain a patentability<br />

decision more quickly from participating offices.<br />

In 2012, 38 <strong>PCT</strong>-PPH pilots were active, with the participation<br />

of 21 offices, including 14 international authorities.<br />

B.6.1 New <strong>PCT</strong>-PPH pilots<br />

The following offices started bilateral <strong>PCT</strong>-PPH pilots<br />

in 2012:<br />

• Danish Patent and Trademark Office (Denmark) and<br />

Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent)<br />

(Russian Federation);<br />

• Rospatent and SIPO;<br />

• JPO and KIPO;<br />

• KIPO and SIPO;<br />

• Industrial Property Office (Czech Republic)<br />

and USPTO;<br />

• Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) and JPO;<br />

• Israel Patent Office and National Board of Patents<br />

and Registration of Finland;<br />

• Israel Patent Office and USPTO; and<br />

• National Institute of Industrial Property (Portugal)<br />

and JPO.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!