09.02.2015 Views

10 07 29 Master thesis Juliana Leon - e-Waste. This guide

10 07 29 Master thesis Juliana Leon - e-Waste. This guide

10 07 29 Master thesis Juliana Leon - e-Waste. This guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 FINAL REMARKS<br />

4.1 Computer waste generation<br />

The market supply method used for the calculation of the computer waste generation<br />

was already employed in another study (Streicher-Porte et al., 2005) and used as<br />

validation for a more complex e-waste generation model in Chile (Steubing, 20<strong>07</strong>).<br />

The generation data was needed as input for the calculations done in the MFA. An<br />

adaptation of the market supply method to take into account informal activities (e.g.<br />

illegal imports) and the recirculation of components, as it occurs in the refurbishment<br />

process, was made. However, this included the addition of two coefficients and no<br />

objective data was available to correctly quantify them. The different computer waste<br />

generation scenarios considered (lower, middle and higher) were, thus, based on<br />

relatively large variations of these parameters in order to consider a wide range of<br />

possible values. Another hypo<strong>thesis</strong> made for the waste generation was the constant<br />

lifespan over the time. Normally, the lifespan of electronic equipments is rather<br />

decreasing, as the ever-accelerated development of newer technologies reduces the<br />

time before equipments are considered obsolete.<br />

The only available study that calculates PC waste in Colombia before is Ott’s study in<br />

2008. Ott’s calculations were based on five scenarios using import and sales data as<br />

input and assuming different lifespan or obsolescence rates, the results range until<br />

2013. The waste generation results computed are in accordance with those by Ott,<br />

except for the inferior limit, which is lower in this study. <strong>This</strong> is due to mainly two<br />

reasons: the consideration of differentiated weights between CRT- and LCD-monitors<br />

that were not considered in Ott’s study and the inclusion of peripherals in addition to<br />

computers for some of Ott’s models. The novelty of the present model is the<br />

differentiation into the type of devices and the resulted computer waste predictions<br />

until 2020, based on market predictions assumed from literature. The observed<br />

changes in the waste flow compositions constitute important information for the<br />

adaptation of the recycling facilities to the differences in treatment between CRT- and<br />

LCD-monitors or laptops and desktop computers.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!