Benchmark Study 1

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Source: Information needed from partners LIFE+ 2007 No. of successful Total budget of successful EU support for successful applications from application application IPP region Saxony-Anhalt 2 38,414,805.00 17,932,122.00 Valencia 7 45,440,987.00 21,338,919.00 Eszak-Alföld 1 1,606,978.00 1,205234.00 Latvia 2 34,944,925.00 16,384,178.00 Source:http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm LIFE+ 2008 No. of successful Total budget of successful EU support for applications from application successful application IPP region Saxony-Anhalt 1 2,184,912.00 1,092,456.00 Valencia 10 16,754,640.00 7,078,055.00 Eszak-Alföld 1 969,090.00 401,737.00 Latvia 2 1,388,954.00 874,305.00 Source:http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm LIFE+ 2009 No. of successful Total budget of successful EU support for successful applications from application application IPP region Saxony-Anhalt Valencia 4 11,244,606.00 2,619,264.00 Eszak-Alföld Latvia 4 8,317,348.00 4,523,622.00 Source: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm INTELLIGENT ENERGY EUROPE 2007 No. of successful Total budget of successful applications from application EU support for successful IPP region application Saxony-Anhalt 1 617,185.00 308,592.50 Valencia 8 7,421,941.00 4,946,644.04 Eszak-Alföld 0 - - Latvia 11 16,103,116.00 10,218,480.00 Source: http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home INTELLIGENT ENERGY EUROPE 2008 No. of successful Total budget of successful applications from application EU support for successful IPP region application Saxony-Anhalt 0 - - Valencia 2 2,750,826.00 2,063,119.50 North Great Plains 0 - - Latvia 5 8,148,809.00 6,850,395.00 Source:http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home Page 148 www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT INTELLIGENT ENERGY EUROPE 2009 No. of successful Total budget of successful applications from application EU support for successful IPP region application Saxony-Anhalt 0 - - Valencia 0 - - Eszak-Alföld 2 2,161,807.00 1,621,355.25 Latvia 5 6,978,781.00 5,234,086.65 Source: http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home Key findings: The data on the participation of IPP regions in a selected number of EU- programmes leads to the following conclusions: o With regard to the Research Framework Programme Valencia was able to acquire 65 percent of the EU-27 average funding per head in the 6 th Research Framework Programme, which is almost twice as much then any other IPP region. However during the 7 th Research Framework Programme Valencia was only able to acquire 41% of the EU-27 average. In all IPP regions the acquisition figures for funding stay way behind the national lead region or the European lead regions which have acquired between 3 and nearly 25 (!) times more then the IPP regions. This underlines on the one hand the large concentration of EU-research funding on only a very limited number of regions in Europe. It also shows however the potential scope for the IPP regions to gain bigger access in the European Research funding if their research institutions would put more effort and emphasis on participating in these programmes. o With regard to INTERREG IV C it can be stated that almost all IPP regions – given their individual size – have acquired in relative terms similar amounts of EU funds. There were however striking differences in the strategies used to apply for the funds. Saxony-Anhalt and partly also North Great Plains had a much higher success ratio between applied projects and granted projects. The Saxony-Anhalt ratio was 46% whereas the ratio of successful projects with regard to applied projects for Valencia was just 10%. There seem to be strong differences in the application strategies between the regions which largely determine their success rate. Saxony-Anhalt was successful in applying with projects including a strong role for the regional government (i.e. as Lead Partners) whereby local authorities in Saxony-Anhalt were largely absent to take part in INTERREG applications. o With regard to the LIFE+ programme it is a totally different story. Whereby Valencia managed to succeed with 21 applications, North Great Plains only managed 2 and Saxony-Anhalt only managed 3 successful applications in the calls of 2007, 2008 and 2009. Latvia had 8 successful applications. However in the 2007 call Saxony-Anhalt managed to acquire with 2 successful applications an EU support of nearly 18 Mio. Euro. Valencia managed with its 21 successful bids a total EU support of around 30.5 Mio. Euro. Page 149 www.i-p-p.eu
Page 1 and 2:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT 1 ST BENCHMARK
Page 3 and 4:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 7. Key
Page 5 and 6:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 INNOVA.
Page 7 and 8:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 general
Page 9 and 10:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 CHAPTER
Page 11 and 12:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 1. Key
Page 13 and 14:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 The num
Page 15 and 16:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 employa
Page 17 and 18:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 transpo
Page 19 and 20:
Bio and gene technology IPP BENCHMA
Page 21 and 22:
Medical technology IPP BENCHMARK RE
Page 23 and 24:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 The agr
Page 25 and 26:
o o o o o o Non-university research
Page 27 and 28:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 6. Gove
Page 29 and 30:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 The pub
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 activit
Page 35 and 36:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 agricul
Page 37 and 38:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 Region
Page 39 and 40:
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT V. 1.0 7. Terr
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT aquacultur
Page 45 and 46:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Nowadays t
Page 47 and 48:
4.-Key features of the Economy & In
Page 49 and 50:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT The total
Page 51 and 52:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Serv
Page 53 and 54:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT R & D and
Page 55 and 56:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT rationaliz
Page 57 and 58:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Finally, a
Page 59 and 60:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT 1. Key Reg
Page 61 and 62:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT healthcare
Page 63 and 64:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT by interna
Page 65 and 66:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Agricultur
Page 67 and 68:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Baltic Int
Page 69 and 70:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT o strength
Page 71 and 72:
5. Accessibility & transport Infras
Page 73 and 74:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT approximat
Page 75 and 76:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT By stimula
Page 77 and 78:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Improvemen
Page 79 and 80:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT In order t
Page 81 and 82:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT CHAPTER 2.
Page 83 and 84:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT o Structur
Page 85 and 86:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT The struct
Page 87 and 88:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT EU-Funding
Page 89 and 90:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT o Structur
Page 91 and 92:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT EU Se
Page 93 and 94:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT CHAPTER 2.
Page 95 and 96:
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT Innova is
Page 97 and 98: IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT CHAPTER 2.
Page 99 and 100: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT 5. Offering as
Page 101 and 102: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Enterprises) a
Page 103 and 104: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT CAMARAS DE COM
Page 105 and 106: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT RUVID (Network
Page 107 and 108: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Chamber Of Com
Page 109 and 110: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT o Results & Ex
Page 111 and 112: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT • Running th
Page 113 and 114: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT CHAPTER 2.4 SU
Page 115 and 116: o Thematic and Geographical focus I
Page 117 and 118: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT o Main strateg
Page 119 and 120: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT The agency has
Page 121 and 122: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT In addition, t
Page 123 and 124: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Other internat
Page 125 and 126: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Links to other
Page 127 and 128: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Latvian Associ
Page 129 and 130: o Staff IPP BENCHMARK REPORT There
Page 131 and 132: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT o Web&Contact
Page 133 and 134: o Main Activities: IPP BENCHMARK RE
Page 135 and 136: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Vidzeme Univer
Page 137 and 138: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT o Main difficu
Page 139 and 140: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Main barriers
Page 141 and 142: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT According to t
Page 143 and 144: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT mote the busin
Page 145 and 146: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT CHAPTER 4 BENC
Page 147: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT 6 th Framework
Page 151 and 152: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Nr. Name of pr
Page 153 and 154: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Population age
Page 155 and 156: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Economic perfo
Page 157 and 158: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Social situati
Page 159 and 160: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Change in empl
Page 161 and 162: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Overall assess
Page 163 and 164: IPP BENCHMARK REPORT Based on the a
Page 165: SAXONY ANHALT ESZAK ANFOLD COMUNIDA
show all

Benchmark Study 1

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?