19.02.2015 Views

Benchmark Study 1

Benchmark Study 1

Benchmark Study 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />

INTELLIGENT<br />

ENERGY<br />

EUROPE<br />

2009<br />

No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />

applications from application<br />

EU support for successful<br />

IPP region<br />

application<br />

Saxony-Anhalt 0 - -<br />

Valencia 0 - -<br />

Eszak-Alföld 2 2,161,807.00 1,621,355.25<br />

Latvia 5 6,978,781.00 5,234,086.65<br />

Source: http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home<br />

Key findings:<br />

The data on the participation of IPP regions in a selected number of EU- programmes leads to the following<br />

conclusions:<br />

o<br />

With regard to the Research Framework Programme Valencia was able to acquire 65 percent of<br />

the EU-27 average funding per head in the 6 th Research Framework Programme, which is almost<br />

twice as much then any other IPP region. However during the 7 th Research Framework Programme<br />

Valencia was only able to acquire 41% of the EU-27 average. In all IPP regions the acquisition<br />

figures for funding stay way behind the national lead region or the European lead regions which<br />

have acquired between 3 and nearly 25 (!) times more then the IPP regions. This underlines on the<br />

one hand the large concentration of EU-research funding on only a very limited number of regions<br />

in Europe. It also shows however the potential scope for the IPP regions to gain bigger access in<br />

the European Research funding if their research institutions would put more effort and emphasis on<br />

participating in these programmes.<br />

o<br />

With regard to INTERREG IV C it can be stated that almost all IPP regions – given their individual<br />

size – have acquired in relative terms similar amounts of EU funds. There were however striking<br />

differences in the strategies used to apply for the funds. Saxony-Anhalt and partly also North Great<br />

Plains had a much higher success ratio between applied projects and granted projects. The<br />

Saxony-Anhalt ratio was 46% whereas the ratio of successful projects with regard to applied<br />

projects for Valencia was just 10%. There seem to be strong differences in the application<br />

strategies between the regions which largely determine their success rate. Saxony-Anhalt was<br />

successful in applying with projects including a strong role for the regional government (i.e. as Lead<br />

Partners) whereby local authorities in Saxony-Anhalt were largely absent to take part in<br />

INTERREG applications.<br />

o<br />

With regard to the LIFE+ programme it is a totally different story. Whereby Valencia managed to<br />

succeed with 21 applications, North Great Plains only managed 2 and Saxony-Anhalt only<br />

managed 3 successful applications in the calls of 2007, 2008 and 2009. Latvia had 8 successful<br />

applications. However in the 2007 call Saxony-Anhalt managed to acquire with 2 successful<br />

applications an EU support of nearly 18 Mio. Euro. Valencia managed with its 21 successful bids a<br />

total EU support of around 30.5 Mio. Euro.<br />

Page 149<br />

www.i-p-p.eu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!