Benchmark Study 1
Benchmark Study 1
Benchmark Study 1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
INTELLIGENT<br />
ENERGY<br />
EUROPE<br />
2009<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
applications from application<br />
EU support for successful<br />
IPP region<br />
application<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 0 - -<br />
Valencia 0 - -<br />
Eszak-Alföld 2 2,161,807.00 1,621,355.25<br />
Latvia 5 6,978,781.00 5,234,086.65<br />
Source: http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home<br />
Key findings:<br />
The data on the participation of IPP regions in a selected number of EU- programmes leads to the following<br />
conclusions:<br />
o<br />
With regard to the Research Framework Programme Valencia was able to acquire 65 percent of<br />
the EU-27 average funding per head in the 6 th Research Framework Programme, which is almost<br />
twice as much then any other IPP region. However during the 7 th Research Framework Programme<br />
Valencia was only able to acquire 41% of the EU-27 average. In all IPP regions the acquisition<br />
figures for funding stay way behind the national lead region or the European lead regions which<br />
have acquired between 3 and nearly 25 (!) times more then the IPP regions. This underlines on the<br />
one hand the large concentration of EU-research funding on only a very limited number of regions<br />
in Europe. It also shows however the potential scope for the IPP regions to gain bigger access in<br />
the European Research funding if their research institutions would put more effort and emphasis on<br />
participating in these programmes.<br />
o<br />
With regard to INTERREG IV C it can be stated that almost all IPP regions – given their individual<br />
size – have acquired in relative terms similar amounts of EU funds. There were however striking<br />
differences in the strategies used to apply for the funds. Saxony-Anhalt and partly also North Great<br />
Plains had a much higher success ratio between applied projects and granted projects. The<br />
Saxony-Anhalt ratio was 46% whereas the ratio of successful projects with regard to applied<br />
projects for Valencia was just 10%. There seem to be strong differences in the application<br />
strategies between the regions which largely determine their success rate. Saxony-Anhalt was<br />
successful in applying with projects including a strong role for the regional government (i.e. as Lead<br />
Partners) whereby local authorities in Saxony-Anhalt were largely absent to take part in<br />
INTERREG applications.<br />
o<br />
With regard to the LIFE+ programme it is a totally different story. Whereby Valencia managed to<br />
succeed with 21 applications, North Great Plains only managed 2 and Saxony-Anhalt only<br />
managed 3 successful applications in the calls of 2007, 2008 and 2009. Latvia had 8 successful<br />
applications. However in the 2007 call Saxony-Anhalt managed to acquire with 2 successful<br />
applications an EU support of nearly 18 Mio. Euro. Valencia managed with its 21 successful bids a<br />
total EU support of around 30.5 Mio. Euro.<br />
Page 149<br />
www.i-p-p.eu