DIFFERENtIAl & DIFFERENCE EqUAtIONS ANd APPlICAtIONS
DIFFERENtIAl & DIFFERENCE EqUAtIONS ANd APPlICAtIONS
DIFFERENtIAl & DIFFERENCE EqUAtIONS ANd APPlICAtIONS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR THE<br />
EXISTENCE OF NONCONSTANT TWICE CONTINUOUSLY<br />
DIFFERENTIABLE SOLUTIONS OF x ′′ = f (x)<br />
RODRIGO LÓPEZ POUSO<br />
We deduce necessary and sufficient conditions for having nonconstant classical solutions<br />
of the scalar equation x ′′ = f (x).<br />
Copyright © 2006 Rodrigo López Pouso. This is an open access article distributed under<br />
the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution,<br />
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
In this note, we complement the results obtained in [1] concerning necessary and sufficient<br />
conditions for the existence of nontrivial Carathéodory solutions of the initial value<br />
problem<br />
x ′′ = f (x), x(0) = x 0 , x ′ (0) = x 1 , (1.1)<br />
where f :Dom(f ) ⊂ R → R ∪{−∞,+∞} and x 0 ,x 1 ∈ R.<br />
In order to present the main result in [1] we need some preliminaries. First, a Carathéodory<br />
solution of (1.1)isanymappingx : I ⊂ R → R,whereI is a nontrivial interval<br />
that contains 0, such that x ′ exists and is locally absolutely continuous on I, x(0) = x 0 ,<br />
x ′ (0) = x 1 ,andx satisfies the differential equation almost everywhere on I (in Lebesgue’s<br />
measure sense). Let us remark that classical (twice continuously differentiable) solutions<br />
of (1.1)areCarathéodory solutions but the converse is not true in general.<br />
Let J ⊂ Dom( f ) be a nontrivial interval that contains x 0 (if no such interval exists,<br />
then (1.1) would have no nonconstant solution). Without further assumptions over f ,<br />
we formally define the time map<br />
τ : y ∈ J<br />
∫ y<br />
dr<br />
τ(y):= √<br />
x 0 x<br />
2<br />
1 +2 ∫ r<br />
x 0<br />
f (s)ds , (1.2)<br />
and now we are in a position to state the main result in [1], which gives a characterization<br />
of the nontrivial solvability of (1.1).<br />
Hindawi Publishing Corporation<br />
Proceedings of the Conference on Differential & Difference Equations and Applications, pp. 1195–1199