17.03.2015 Views

DIFFERENtIAl & DIFFERENCE EqUAtIONS ANd APPlICAtIONS

DIFFERENtIAl & DIFFERENCE EqUAtIONS ANd APPlICAtIONS

DIFFERENtIAl & DIFFERENCE EqUAtIONS ANd APPlICAtIONS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR THE<br />

EXISTENCE OF NONCONSTANT TWICE CONTINUOUSLY<br />

DIFFERENTIABLE SOLUTIONS OF x ′′ = f (x)<br />

RODRIGO LÓPEZ POUSO<br />

We deduce necessary and sufficient conditions for having nonconstant classical solutions<br />

of the scalar equation x ′′ = f (x).<br />

Copyright © 2006 Rodrigo López Pouso. This is an open access article distributed under<br />

the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution,<br />

and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In this note, we complement the results obtained in [1] concerning necessary and sufficient<br />

conditions for the existence of nontrivial Carathéodory solutions of the initial value<br />

problem<br />

x ′′ = f (x), x(0) = x 0 , x ′ (0) = x 1 , (1.1)<br />

where f :Dom(f ) ⊂ R → R ∪{−∞,+∞} and x 0 ,x 1 ∈ R.<br />

In order to present the main result in [1] we need some preliminaries. First, a Carathéodory<br />

solution of (1.1)isanymappingx : I ⊂ R → R,whereI is a nontrivial interval<br />

that contains 0, such that x ′ exists and is locally absolutely continuous on I, x(0) = x 0 ,<br />

x ′ (0) = x 1 ,andx satisfies the differential equation almost everywhere on I (in Lebesgue’s<br />

measure sense). Let us remark that classical (twice continuously differentiable) solutions<br />

of (1.1)areCarathéodory solutions but the converse is not true in general.<br />

Let J ⊂ Dom( f ) be a nontrivial interval that contains x 0 (if no such interval exists,<br />

then (1.1) would have no nonconstant solution). Without further assumptions over f ,<br />

we formally define the time map<br />

τ : y ∈ J<br />

∫ y<br />

dr<br />

τ(y):= √<br />

x 0 x<br />

2<br />

1 +2 ∫ r<br />

x 0<br />

f (s)ds , (1.2)<br />

and now we are in a position to state the main result in [1], which gives a characterization<br />

of the nontrivial solvability of (1.1).<br />

Hindawi Publishing Corporation<br />

Proceedings of the Conference on Differential & Difference Equations and Applications, pp. 1195–1199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!