01.04.2015 Views

The Questions of Developmental Biology

The Questions of Developmental Biology

The Questions of Developmental Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"Life's splendid drama"<br />

Until this decade, "many invertebrate biologists saw the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> relationships<br />

among the phyla as an insoluble dilemma. . . . Indeed, as late as 1990, a comprehensive summary<br />

concluded that the relationships between most <strong>of</strong> the higher animal groups were entirely<br />

unresolved" (Erwin et al. 1997). However, in the 1990s, a broad consensus on the general form <strong>of</strong><br />

a phylogenetic tree <strong>of</strong> life began to emerge among paleontologists, molecular biologists, and<br />

developmental geneticists (see Winnepenninckx et al. 1998; Davidson and Ruvkun 1999; Erwin<br />

1999). This consensus (one representation <strong>of</strong> which is shown in Figure 22.1A) came about from<br />

(1) improved methods <strong>of</strong> analyzing DNA, taking into account its variation within groups <strong>of</strong><br />

animals, (2) new data on conserved regulatory gene sequences such as the Hox genes, which are<br />

usually stable within phyla but can diverge between phyla, (3) morphological evidence for the<br />

related nature <strong>of</strong> some structures that had once been thought to be distinct, and (4) computer<br />

programs that can sort out enormous amounts <strong>of</strong> data, not privileging any particular set <strong>of</strong><br />

relationships over others. <strong>The</strong> results were surprising to many scientists.<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> animal kingdom can be divided into Porifera (sponges), Cnidaria and Ctenophora (jellyfish<br />

and comb jellies), and the Bilateria. <strong>The</strong> Porifera lack any coherent epithelium or any symmetry.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Cnidaria and Ctenophora are diploblastic (with two epithelial layers, lacking mesoderm) and<br />

have radial symmetry.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Bilateria are triploblastic (with true endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm), have bilateral<br />

symmetry and can be divided into two groups, the deuterostomes and the protostomes. <strong>The</strong><br />

deuterostomes include the echinoderms and the chordates. (Echinoderm larvae are originally<br />

bilateral.) Deuterostomes form their anuses from their blastopores. <strong>The</strong>y probably arose from a<br />

tornaria larva similar to that <strong>of</strong> the pluteus.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> protostomes can be divided into two groups, the Ecdysozoa (animals whose bodies are<br />

covered by an exoskeleton, which therefore molt as they grow) and the Lophotrochozoa<br />

(animals that have most or all <strong>of</strong> their s<strong>of</strong>t tissues in contact with the environment and which<br />

generally use cilia in feeding or locomotion). Nematodes and flatworms (which lack true<br />

coeloms) had formerly been considered basal groups, perhaps ancestral to both the protostomes<br />

and the deuterostomes. However, the new studies have shown that the nematodes belong to the<br />

Ecdysozoa and the flatworms (as Wilson had predicted) to the Lophotrochozoa. Each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

two groups is monophyletic, meaning that the phyla in each <strong>of</strong> them share a common ancestor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!