likely a number <strong>of</strong> highly qualified <strong>in</strong>dividuals who can’t afford to volunteer. Maybe part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solution is f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g grants that can support a volunteer dur<strong>in</strong>g this time or to cut <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> required volunteer time. I def<strong>in</strong>itely see a lot <strong>of</strong> positives to <strong>the</strong> subsidized volunteer approach, and I don’t want to see ano<strong>the</strong>r situation where teenagers cry <strong>the</strong>ir hearts out because <strong>the</strong>y can’t afford to volunteer. Charles Lewis: I misspoke a bit because it’s not just volunteers. We have about 45 part-time <strong>in</strong>structors, and 95% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structors are paid. Also, a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> full-time staff that we have hired will teach a couple hours a week and <strong>the</strong>n go to half time, so <strong>the</strong>re is a payment. But a problem with hir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>structors on an hourly basis is that it is generally after school hours, and if <strong>the</strong>y are hold<strong>in</strong>g a regular 9-to-5 job, <strong>the</strong>y can’t work for us part time. So we are try<strong>in</strong>g to figure that out and f<strong>in</strong>d ways to provide opportunities for people to contribute to <strong>the</strong> community through our program. Samuel Aguiar Iñiguez: I have just one more comment. If <strong>the</strong>y are from Americorps and Vista, maybe, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> volunteers, you could go through student-loan centers and maybe pay student loans <strong>of</strong>f until <strong>the</strong>y get paid. Charles Lewis: Which <strong>the</strong>y do with Americorps and Vista, for sure. Paul Flores: I liked <strong>the</strong> description <strong>of</strong> your organization. It sounds very similar to <strong>the</strong> way we have structured Youth Speaks. Youth Speaks is an all-artist-run organization. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> staff members are practic<strong>in</strong>g artists—performers, writers, mentors—and our budget has grown also to over one million dollars <strong>in</strong> less than 10 years. At this po<strong>in</strong>t, we are discover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> problems <strong>of</strong> a limited <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Where you have young people—everyone on <strong>the</strong> staff is under 40, with some members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> staff only 15 years old and some 36—we are discover<strong>in</strong>g that we are hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure problems because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> creative control we do give our staff members. What I want to ask Charles is: Do you give staff members creative control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir programs? Do <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> responsibility to develop <strong>the</strong>se programs, and are <strong>the</strong>y accountable for <strong>the</strong> success or failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se programs? In my organization, we have k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> a supervisory style. Between <strong>the</strong> programm<strong>in</strong>g and education functions, <strong>the</strong>re are directors, and <strong>the</strong>y supervise certa<strong>in</strong> staff members, but, at <strong>the</strong> same time, it is artists supervis<strong>in</strong>g artists. And artists—we’ve got great ideas. We are wonderful at com<strong>in</strong>g up with programs. We can program until we are blue <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face. But we are not good at balanc<strong>in</strong>g budgets. We are not good with f<strong>in</strong>ances. <strong>The</strong>se comments are generalizations, but as someone who has worked <strong>in</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations for 10 years where I have creative control, I cont<strong>in</strong>ue to have struggles with budget<strong>in</strong>g—figur<strong>in</strong>g out who to pay and how much and da, da, da, da, da. So what ends up happen<strong>in</strong>g is that this creative control bleeds over <strong>in</strong>to a lack <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial control. When that happens, <strong>the</strong>re seems to be a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> split—a conflict with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> organization’s leadership about what decisions need to be made and who is accountable. If I am <strong>the</strong> program director and my program ends up $15,000 to $16,000 over budget, that’s my responsibility. Yet, at <strong>the</strong> same time, my executive director signed <strong>of</strong>f on <strong>the</strong> budget and watched as more <strong>of</strong> it grew. What I am wonder<strong>in</strong>g is, as someone who is also <strong>in</strong> an organization that is grow<strong>in</strong>g rapidly, how do you plan on handl<strong>in</strong>g those types <strong>of</strong> issues when you give creative control and that control gets out <strong>of</strong> control to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent? Charles Lewis: So far, we haven’t had any problems with it because <strong>the</strong>re is just one checkbook, and I am sign<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> checks, so <strong>the</strong>re isn’t <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g over budget, and we are just mak<strong>in</strong>g do with <strong>the</strong> funds we have. I th<strong>in</strong>k you make a good po<strong>in</strong>t that, when <strong>the</strong> organization grows, <strong>the</strong>re are go<strong>in</strong>g to be some potential problems, but I th<strong>in</strong>k it is a good exercise for artists and non-artists alike to go through and balance <strong>the</strong> revenues and expenses. In our programs, we can’t have 86
expenses without <strong>the</strong> revenues. We don’t have a slush fund or anyth<strong>in</strong>g like that, so we just have to stay under budget or <strong>the</strong> program won’t happen. Right now, we just don’t have a whole lot <strong>of</strong> options, but it is a good th<strong>in</strong>g to prepare for <strong>the</strong> future as we get larger. 87
- Page 1:
The New Face of Arts Leadership in
- Page 5:
The New Face of Arts Leadership in
- Page 8 and 9:
Table of Contents (continued) B. Th
- Page 11 and 12:
Introduction By Len Edgerly The New
- Page 13 and 14:
Symposium Participants The informat
- Page 15 and 16:
Keynote Address: Diversifying the F
- Page 17 and 18:
So, leadership has a much different
- Page 19 and 20:
directly visible. Sometimes, change
- Page 21 and 22:
as storytellers, keepers of cultura
- Page 23 and 24:
tonight. Can you talk a little bit
- Page 25 and 26:
are we talking about? Is it in the
- Page 27:
8 Craig E. Johnson, Meeting the Eth
- Page 30 and 31:
Ming Luke: My name is Ming Luke. I
- Page 32 and 33:
am really more interested in social
- Page 34 and 35:
scholarship is computer-mediated co
- Page 36 and 37:
“Which is the path?” for the Ze
- Page 38 and 39:
up to me and asking me who is going
- Page 40 and 41:
Saturday—I am not certain that we
- Page 42 and 43:
e that leadership and be in control
- Page 45 and 46:
Topic One: Language as it Relates t
- Page 47 and 48:
mainstream. I want them to destroy
- Page 49 and 50: Ganbold Presentation This text is a
- Page 51: assertions are an effort to avoid l
- Page 54 and 55: eal people.” Everybody is “the
- Page 56 and 57: videos—How to Remove Birch Bark,
- Page 58 and 59: Meaning does not lie solely in the
- Page 60 and 61: culture. In that scenario, my audie
- Page 62 and 63: show me the way to be the most humb
- Page 64 and 65: 3 Helen Dick, How to Remove Spruce
- Page 66 and 67: its celebration of the new year fro
- Page 68 and 69: Response and Discussion Shane Morem
- Page 70 and 71: month, they work together and learn
- Page 72 and 73: In February, we are having a gather
- Page 74 and 75: 120 events per year, and they have
- Page 76 and 77: a leader and you have an incredible
- Page 78 and 79: or anything like that, but building
- Page 80 and 81: ut we have to help them help us und
- Page 83 and 84: Topic 3: Leadership Styles in Ethni
- Page 85: ut what we are trying to do is exer
- Page 88 and 89: traditional leadership. There are m
- Page 90 and 91: she wanted to get married. What doe
- Page 92 and 93: I think that it is very important t
- Page 94 and 95: We also have students on our board
- Page 96 and 97: think about sustainability, to thin
- Page 98 and 99: Ideally, when an institution needs
- Page 103 and 104: Topic 4B: Emerging Leaders in the A
- Page 105 and 106: opment programs to help them move f
- Page 107 and 108: to say “no” and learn to say
- Page 109 and 110: complained about lack of support, b
- Page 111 and 112: Summary and Final Comments Shane Mo
- Page 113 and 114: When we were talking about language
- Page 115 and 116: I am a historian and an anthropolog
- Page 117 and 118: am using the analogy that we all ca
- Page 119 and 120: We have to foster and mature young
- Page 121 and 122: List of Preliminary Readings on Lea
- Page 123 and 124: References and Works Cited Aguirre,
- Page 125 and 126: West, Kanye. “Heard ‘Em Say.”
- Page 127 and 128: Symposium Process and Agenda About
- Page 129 and 130: Participants’ Biographies The bio
- Page 131 and 132: her third City of Los Angeles Artis
- Page 133 and 134: the Metropolitan State College of D
- Page 135 and 136: Shandiin Sunrise is creatively buil
- Page 137 and 138: Symposium Observers Lucero Arellano