26.04.2015 Views

Cadmium Substitution - garteur

Cadmium Substitution - garteur

Cadmium Substitution - garteur

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GARTEUR LIMITED<br />

was then immersed in 600 mmol l -1 sodium chloride solution at 25 o C for a period of two<br />

weeks, during which time the galvanic current was monitored using a zero resistance<br />

ammeter and chart recorder.<br />

C.2.3.4<br />

Cathodic protection measurement technique<br />

C.3 Results<br />

The technique involves the measurement of potentials along a steel strip immersed in 6<br />

mmol l -1 sodium chloride solution at 25+ 2 o C. The coating of interest is attached at one<br />

end of the strip as shown in figure C2. The potential along the strip is measured via a<br />

series of 11 saturated calomel electrodes each independently connected to a data<br />

logger. The SCEs were at the following distances from the edge of the coating;<br />

0, 5, 10, 17, 22, 28, 40, 60, 90, 120, 150mm<br />

Potential measurements along the steel strips were carried out for up to 1500 hours.<br />

Further details of the technique are given at reference C10.<br />

C.3.1<br />

C.3.1.1<br />

Barrier properties<br />

Accelerated corrosion tests<br />

a) Resistance to neutral salt fog<br />

Neutral salt spray tests were conducted by three laboratories DERA, Shorts and Fokker<br />

and the results in terms of the time to red rust are given in Table C5.<br />

Although the actual times to red rust for undamaged panels varied considerably between<br />

the three laboratories, there was general agreement regarding the relative performances<br />

of the zinc based coatings and the SermeTel coating. The data show that only the<br />

metallic ceramic coatings, SermeTel out performed cadmium when tested in the as<br />

plated condition. In every case carrying out post plating treatments such as passivating<br />

considerably improved the performance of the coating but only the SermeTel 984 coating<br />

with SermeTel 985 gave a higher time to first red rust than passivated cadmium plating.<br />

As plated<br />

SermeTel 984 > ED cadmium >ED zinc – nickel ~ ED zinc – cobalt – iron<br />

Plated + post plating treatment<br />

SermeTel 984 + 985 > Pass. ED cadmium > Pass. ED Zn-Ni ~ Pass. ED Zn-Co-Fe<br />

Tests on aluminium and aluminium based coatings and Magnicoat were only carried out<br />

at DERA. From Table C5 it is apparent that whilst the as plated UMS Al-Mg, Magnicoat<br />

and SermeTel coatings out perform cadmium plating in the neutral salt fog tests, the<br />

passivated cadmium plating gives the highest level of corrosion protection.<br />

b) Exposure to intermittent acidified salt spray (MASTMAASIS)<br />

MASTMAASIS testing was undertaken by DERA and NLR and the results are<br />

summarised in table C6. Whilst good agreement was obtained for tests conducted on as<br />

plated panels, some differences were found on tests carried out on passivated panels.<br />

GARTEUR SM/AG17 TP128 Page 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!