Cadmium Substitution - garteur
Cadmium Substitution - garteur
Cadmium Substitution - garteur
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GARTEUR LIMITED<br />
was then immersed in 600 mmol l -1 sodium chloride solution at 25 o C for a period of two<br />
weeks, during which time the galvanic current was monitored using a zero resistance<br />
ammeter and chart recorder.<br />
C.2.3.4<br />
Cathodic protection measurement technique<br />
C.3 Results<br />
The technique involves the measurement of potentials along a steel strip immersed in 6<br />
mmol l -1 sodium chloride solution at 25+ 2 o C. The coating of interest is attached at one<br />
end of the strip as shown in figure C2. The potential along the strip is measured via a<br />
series of 11 saturated calomel electrodes each independently connected to a data<br />
logger. The SCEs were at the following distances from the edge of the coating;<br />
0, 5, 10, 17, 22, 28, 40, 60, 90, 120, 150mm<br />
Potential measurements along the steel strips were carried out for up to 1500 hours.<br />
Further details of the technique are given at reference C10.<br />
C.3.1<br />
C.3.1.1<br />
Barrier properties<br />
Accelerated corrosion tests<br />
a) Resistance to neutral salt fog<br />
Neutral salt spray tests were conducted by three laboratories DERA, Shorts and Fokker<br />
and the results in terms of the time to red rust are given in Table C5.<br />
Although the actual times to red rust for undamaged panels varied considerably between<br />
the three laboratories, there was general agreement regarding the relative performances<br />
of the zinc based coatings and the SermeTel coating. The data show that only the<br />
metallic ceramic coatings, SermeTel out performed cadmium when tested in the as<br />
plated condition. In every case carrying out post plating treatments such as passivating<br />
considerably improved the performance of the coating but only the SermeTel 984 coating<br />
with SermeTel 985 gave a higher time to first red rust than passivated cadmium plating.<br />
As plated<br />
SermeTel 984 > ED cadmium >ED zinc – nickel ~ ED zinc – cobalt – iron<br />
Plated + post plating treatment<br />
SermeTel 984 + 985 > Pass. ED cadmium > Pass. ED Zn-Ni ~ Pass. ED Zn-Co-Fe<br />
Tests on aluminium and aluminium based coatings and Magnicoat were only carried out<br />
at DERA. From Table C5 it is apparent that whilst the as plated UMS Al-Mg, Magnicoat<br />
and SermeTel coatings out perform cadmium plating in the neutral salt fog tests, the<br />
passivated cadmium plating gives the highest level of corrosion protection.<br />
b) Exposure to intermittent acidified salt spray (MASTMAASIS)<br />
MASTMAASIS testing was undertaken by DERA and NLR and the results are<br />
summarised in table C6. Whilst good agreement was obtained for tests conducted on as<br />
plated panels, some differences were found on tests carried out on passivated panels.<br />
GARTEUR SM/AG17 TP128 Page 59