26.04.2015 Views

Cadmium Substitution - garteur

Cadmium Substitution - garteur

Cadmium Substitution - garteur

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GARTEUR LIMITED<br />

E.3 Results and discussion<br />

S-N curves were obtained for each of the coatings evaluated. Figure E2 gives examples<br />

of curves obtained for specimens electroplated with zinc-cobalt-iron and zinc-nickel. In<br />

these tests the specimens had a stress concentration factor (K t ) of 1.4.<br />

All the S-N curves obtained are given in reference E1 together with the individual fatigue<br />

specimen results.<br />

Data obtained from the S-N curves were used to calculate the relative effects of the<br />

different coatings on the fatigue strength of the steel. These are summarised in table E1.<br />

The fatigue strength for each of the coatings is compared with the fatigue strength for<br />

specimens, which have been abrasive blasted with alumina grit.<br />

The results obtained show that the coating causing the greatest reduction in fatigue<br />

strength is ED zinc - nickel. ED zinc-cobalt-iron was similar to ED cadmium giving a<br />

reduction of ~10% whilst the other coatings investigated resulted in a lowering in fatigue<br />

strength of about 5%.<br />

Several factors will influence the initiation of fatigue cracks on coated specimens. These<br />

include,<br />

• coating thickness<br />

• surface roughness due to grit blasting<br />

• peening effect due to grit blasting<br />

• strength of the base material<br />

• hydrogen embrittlement<br />

A detailed study has been made at NLR [E1] in order to identify the impact of these<br />

factors on the fatigue life. Metallographic sectioning has shown that there are<br />

considerable variations in the thickness of the coating within the notched region for each<br />

of the coatings. There were also found to be large differences in the surface roughness<br />

as a result of the pre-coating abrasive blasting treatment. This arises from the fact that<br />

the abrasive blasting was carried out by each of the organisations responsible for the<br />

different coating processes. Although surface roughness will influence the fatigue crack<br />

initiation, NLR's study suggests that the embedded aluminium oxide particles may act as<br />

preferred crack initiation sites.<br />

E.4 Conclusions<br />

1. Based on constant amplitude tests the following conclusions can be drawn<br />

concerning the effects of coatings on the fatigue strength on steel.<br />

2. By the aluminium oxide blasting treatment before the coating process the surface is<br />

roughened but also aluminium oxide particles are trapped in the surface metal.<br />

3. Entrapped oxide particles are potential fatigue crack initiation sites.<br />

4. The ED Zinc - nickel coating resulted in the largest reduction in fatigue strength,<br />

25%. This was due to the hard brittle coating and the relatively large coating<br />

thickness.<br />

5. ED zinc - cobalt - iron gave no larger reduction in fatigue strength than cadmium,<br />

~10%. The negative effect of cadmium on fatigue strength is unexplained.<br />

Page 80<br />

GARTEUR SM/AG17 TP128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!