29.04.2015 Views

201504 CM April

THE CICM JOURNAL FOR CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT PROFESSIONALS

THE CICM JOURNAL FOR CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT PROFESSIONALS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LEGAL COLUMN<br />

NORTHERN ROCK’S<br />

CONFUSING LOANS<br />

Northern Rock purported to incorporate the provisions of the<br />

Consumer Credit Act 1974 into some loans, which were not strictly<br />

regulated consumer credit agreements. Peter Walker reviews a recent<br />

case to see if the other borrowers could claim the same recompense.<br />

IN the first half of the 20th century<br />

Robert Benchley, a US humourist,<br />

would not trust a bank prepared to lend<br />

money to him, such ‘a poor risk’ he<br />

thought, but what turned out to be poor<br />

decisions by financiers, such as Northern<br />

Rock, were part of this century’s greater<br />

financial problems. A High Court judge in<br />

NRAM plc v McAdam and Hartley [2014]<br />

EWHC 4174 (Comm) considered some of<br />

Northern Rock’s problems in the light of the<br />

Consumer Credit Act 1974.<br />

The background to the litigation was<br />

that, after the nationalisation of Northern<br />

Rock, the business was split, and NRAM<br />

plc took over the pre-existing mortgages<br />

together with the pre-existing unsecured<br />

loan accounts. It has a new owner, UK<br />

Asset Resolution Limited, which has<br />

another subsidiary company owning<br />

the closed mortgage books of Bradford<br />

and Bingley. Taxpayers in the UK will be<br />

interested in the outcome, because the<br />

government has lent a lot of money to<br />

resolve the financial problems of those two<br />

financial institutions.<br />

The new companies deal with the<br />

transactions created by their predecessors,<br />

including certain unsecured credit<br />

agreements entered into by Northern<br />

Rock. Some borrowers took out secured<br />

loans of up to nine percent of the value<br />

of their homes and further unsecured<br />

loans of up to 30 percent of that value.<br />

Those unsecured loans were capped at<br />

£30,000.<br />

The two defendants in the NRAM case<br />

borrowed that full amount, but section 8(2)<br />

(since repealed by the Consumer Credit<br />

Act 2006 effective on 6 <strong>April</strong> 2008) of the<br />

Consumer Credit Act 1974 only created<br />

regulated consumer credit agreements<br />

when the credit was less than £25,000.<br />

Regulated agreements have to comply<br />

with provisions such as those relating<br />

to disclosure of information, and from 1<br />

October 2008 creditors have to supply<br />

periodic statements (s 77A of the 1974 Act).<br />

44 <strong>April</strong> 2015 www.cicm.com<br />

The recognised standard in credit management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!