15.05.2015 Views

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Plc 13-4<br />

Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> Project<br />

<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> <strong>Preliminary</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Table 13.1.3.1: Whittle Results<br />

Production Rate Units 1.1 Mtpa 2.2 Mtpa<br />

Potentially Mineable Resources t 152,411,794 152,411,794<br />

Waste t 46,206,355 46,206,355<br />

SR w:o 0.30 0.30<br />

Product Tonnes t 126,501,784 126,501,784<br />

Initial Capital US$ 197,000,000 269,000,000<br />

Sales Price US$ 152 133<br />

NPV US$ 881,992,227 1,647,723,559<br />

Life yr 137 57<br />

Payback yr 1.82 1.41<br />

IRR % 54 71<br />

*This PEA includes the inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied<br />

to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that the preliminary assessment will ever be realized.<br />

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability<br />

It must be stressed that the results reported in Table 13.1.3.1 are for comparative purposes to<br />

check effect of production rate. If compared to the economic model, the NPV number will vary<br />

considerably given lack of taxes, duties, depreciation and other miscellaneous expenses. The<br />

mine life achieved for both cases re-enforce that resource inventory for feed stock is not a<br />

limiting factor for the potential operation.<br />

13.1.4 Pit Design<br />

Pit designs for the Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> deposit were constructed using Vulcan 8 general-purpose<br />

mine planning package. The final pit design used was based on pit optimization results as a<br />

guide for toe and crest location. No Ramps were added given the preliminary nature of the block<br />

model and because the majority of the resource daylights within current valley systems on site.<br />

Pit Dimensions<br />

SRK used default pit parameters illustrated in Table 13.1.4.1.<br />

Table 13.1.4.1: Pit Design Parameters<br />

Dump Parameter<br />

Value<br />

Batter/Bench Face Angle 64º<br />

Berm Width 2.5m<br />

Bench Height<br />

5m<br />

Overall Slope 45º<br />

SRK constructed three pit designs representing three phases used in construction of a preliminary<br />

production schedule. Figure 13-1 illustrates the final pit design layout and tonnage basis for the<br />

production schedule.<br />

SRK did not construct any form of dump design. Given the low stripping ratio and abundance of<br />

land that waste can be placed, SRK does not consider creating a waste dump design material for<br />

the project at this stage.<br />

SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. September 16, 2011<br />

Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong>_<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> PEA_3<strong>43</strong>500.020_007_KG

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!