15.05.2015 Views

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Plc 10-1<br />

Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> Project<br />

<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> <strong>Preliminary</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

10<br />

Data Verification (Item 12)<br />

10.1 Funchal Norte Target<br />

<strong>Verde</strong> did not carry out a proper QA/QC program. The current QA/QC analysis is the internal<br />

Bureau Veritas program.<br />

5% of samples sent to the Bureau Veritas were then sent to SGS in Belo Horizonte to undertake<br />

an umpire sample.<br />

In the QA/QC program implemented by <strong>Verde</strong> in May 2010, as the analytical results are<br />

received, they are immediately imported into the respective sampling spreadsheets, where any<br />

undesirable analytical deviations of standards, blanks, duplicates, or inconsistency between the<br />

sample result and its respective lithology can be easily compared. Simple inversions of sample<br />

results and typing errors of the spreadsheets after receiving the certificates, are also common and,<br />

therefore, all the results of all samples must be checked one by one and not only the control<br />

samples introduced.<br />

The accuracy, precision and contamination of the analysis should be evaluated.<br />

All reference materials require validation, to check the level of accuracy and reliability of the<br />

laboratories. The mistakes detected in the analytical procedures are identified and evaluated<br />

having as reference the precision of the method.<br />

The results for the certified reference materials (standard samples) must be between the limits of<br />

2.SD (twice the standard deviation).<br />

The validation method of the blank samples consists in verifying the presence of the analyte.<br />

Therefore it is necessary to observe the detection limit of the method.<br />

If there is any analysis deviation of the control samples or inconsistencies with the respective<br />

lithologies, the batches should be re-examined and eventually re-sampled. Depending on the<br />

situation, and certifying that there could not have been any mistake on sampling (which is<br />

common), the costs of re-examination will be on the laboratory. If the blank values are very<br />

high, the method of sample preparation should be checked. If all values for the standards are off<br />

the defined limits, the digestion method of the samples should be checked. When the results of<br />

standards and blanks are following a same trend, higher or lower than expected, the analysis for<br />

all the batch of samples sent should be repeated, including the reference ones.<br />

Besides the analysis of the results obtained, an unannounced visit to the laboratory is<br />

programmed to check the conditions of the analysis.<br />

Only after all results from each batch of samples are checked and validated, can information be<br />

fed into the database.<br />

The final validation of the results obtained is performed by an independent consultant (Qualified<br />

Person).<br />

Coffey Mining has reviewed the QA/QC results returned by Bureau Veritas as presented in Table<br />

10.1.1.<br />

SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. September 16, 2011<br />

Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong>_<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> PEA_3<strong>43</strong>500.020_007_KG

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!