NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash
NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash
NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Plc 12-14<br />
Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> Project<br />
<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> <strong>Preliminary</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
For indicated resource in Target 7 was allocated blocks interpolated by the first three search<br />
ellipses, with a drillhole grid about 300 by 300 m and with outcrops sampling approximately 100<br />
by 100 m.<br />
12.2.8 Assignment of Density Values to the Block Model<br />
The density value was allocated directly for each block of the block model. The value of<br />
1.49t/m 3 was allocated to the oxidized <strong>Verde</strong>te blocks, and the value of 2.11t/m 3 was allocated to<br />
the fresh <strong>Verde</strong>te blocks.<br />
12.2.9 Block Model Validation<br />
The block model with grades interpolated was submitted to a visual and statistics check.<br />
Histograms and probability plots were constructed to the interpolated grades. Then, the<br />
interpolated grades were compared with the same histograms and probability plots of the<br />
composite samples. Histograms and graphics of the interpolated grades and composite samples<br />
were similar, which confirmed the validity and consistency of the block model built.<br />
In addition, the grades interpolated were displayed and compared with the grades of the drillhole<br />
samples. This comparison show an approximate relation, indicating the accuracy of the block<br />
model built. Thus, several sections were built showing the grades of the block model and<br />
drillholes of Target 6.<br />
The average grade of the model was compared with the average grade of the drillhole samples.<br />
Comparing the IDW with power 2 and the kriging methods to the Target 6, was verified a<br />
relative difference of 1.09% between them, as shown in Table 12.2.9.1.<br />
A data comparison was made between a polygonal provisional estimate by the weighting<br />
"intervals" method and the data obtained by the Kriging and IPD2 interpolation method. These<br />
comparisons are presented in Table 12.2.9.2. The difference between the average K 2 O grades<br />
and of metal tones in relative percentage is approximately 1.26%, which also confirms the good<br />
convergence and high reliability of the block model data. The 0.03% difference between the<br />
volumes of solids and the block model are due to the use of different methods of limitations,<br />
since the block model was constrained by the method of contour.<br />
Table 12.2.9.1: Comparison of metal tones and average K2O grade of the model, obtained<br />
by kriging and IDW2 methods to Target 6<br />
Relative difference Relative difference<br />
Tonnes KRIG Tonnes IDW2 KRIG IDW2<br />
KRIG – IDW2 KRIG – IDW2<br />
Cut Off<br />
Mt<br />
Mt K 2 O K 2 O<br />
K<br />
% %<br />
2 O<br />
Tonnes<br />
Relative % Relative %<br />
6 95.9 94.87 8.2796 8.3695 1.09 1.07<br />
SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. September 16, 2011<br />
Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong>_<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> PEA_3<strong>43</strong>500.020_007_KG