15.05.2015 Views

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Plc<br />

Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> Project<br />

iv<br />

<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> <strong>Preliminary</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

23<br />

24<br />

22.1.2 Metallurgical ....................................................................................... 22-1<br />

22.1.3 Mining ................................................................................................. 22-1<br />

22.1.4 Costs .................................................................................................... 22-2<br />

REFERENCES (ITEM 27) ............................................................................................ 23-1<br />

GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................. 24-1<br />

24.1 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................. 24-1<br />

24.2 Mineral Reserves ............................................................................................... 24-1<br />

24.3 Glossary ............................................................................................................. 24-2<br />

24.4 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... 24-3<br />

List of Tables<br />

Table 1: Grade Tonnage Report Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Project .................................................. IV<br />

Table 2: Indicative <strong>Economic</strong>s ....................................................................................................... V<br />

Table 3: Recommended Prefeasibility Work Program Cost Estimate (US$000’s) ....................... V<br />

Table 2.2.1: Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Project Tenement Schedule ................................................ 2-1<br />

Table 8.1.1: Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Project Summary Drilling Statistics ................................... 8-1<br />

Table 8.2.1: Drilling Statistics .................................................................................................... 8-3<br />

Table 8.2.2.1: Summarizes the Recovery Statistics .................................................................... 8-4<br />

Table 9.2.1: Detection Limits of XRF Analysis ......................................................................... 9-2<br />

Table 10.1.1: Standards Utilized by Bureau Veritas ................................................................. 10-2<br />

Table 11.1.2.1: Results of Carbon Speciation Analysis on Two Samples from the Scoping Level<br />

Pilot Plant ....................................................................................................................... 11-3<br />

Table 11.1.4.1: K content in soil (Mehlich 1) After 60 Days of Incubation with Different<br />

Sources of Potassium in a Clay Soil. ............................................................................. 11-4<br />

Table 11.1.4.2: K Content in Soil (Mehlich 1) After 60 Days of Incubation with Different<br />

Sources of Potassium in a Sandy Soil. ........................................................................... 11-4<br />

Table 11.1.4.3: Exchangeable Ca in the Soil After 60 Days of Incubation with Different Sources<br />

of Potassium in A Clay Soil ........................................................................................... 11-5<br />

Table 11.1.4.4: Exchangeable Ca in the Soil After 60 Days of Incubation with Different Sources<br />

of Potassium in a Sandy Soil ......................................................................................... 11-5<br />

Table 11.1.4.5: Exchangeable Mg in the Soil After 60 Days of Incubation with Different<br />

Sources of Potassium in a Clay Soil .............................................................................. 11-5<br />

Table 11.1.4.6: Exchangeable Mg in the Soil After 60 Days of Incubation with Different<br />

Sources of Potassium in a Sandy Soil ............................................................................ 11-6<br />

Table 12.1.2.1: Block Model Summary .................................................................................... 12-2<br />

Table 12.1.3.1: Summary Statistic – 2m Composites ............................................................... 12-2<br />

SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. September 16, 2011<br />

Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong>_<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> PEA_3<strong>43</strong>500.020_007_KG

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!