NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash
NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash
NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment - Verde Potash
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Verde</strong> <strong>Potash</strong> Plc 11-4<br />
Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong> Project<br />
<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> <strong>Preliminary</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
11.1.4 Results of Agronomic Testwork<br />
The available K in the soil shown in Table 11.1.4.1 and 11.1.4.2 indicated that there is no<br />
difference between the water soluble K source (KCl) and Thermo-K, 60 days after application in<br />
sandy and clay soil, using dosage applications of 200 and 400kg/ha K 2 O.<br />
This result shows that the thermal treatment applied to the <strong>Verde</strong>te (raw material used in the<br />
manufacture of Thermo-K) was very efficient from an agronomic point of view. This can be<br />
seen when comparing the results against those of the pure <strong>Verde</strong>te, without heat treatment. In<br />
this case, the K in the soil did not differ from the control standard which means that virtually no<br />
potassium from the <strong>Verde</strong>te was released to the soil, indicating a low efficiency of this material<br />
as a source of potassium for plants.<br />
Table 11.1.4.1: K content in soil (Mehlich 1) After 60 Days of Incubation with Different<br />
Sources of Potassium in a Clay Soil.<br />
Dose K 2 O<br />
K – Source<br />
kg ha -1 KCl Thermo-K <strong>Verde</strong>te<br />
Average<br />
0 -- -- -- 0,07<br />
200 0,24 * a B 0,23 * a B 0,07 ns b A 0,18<br />
400 0,36 * a A 0,32 * b A 0,07 ns c A 0,25<br />
Average 0,30 0,27 0,07<br />
CV% = 9,40<br />
DMS dose = 0,03; DMS source = 0,03; DMS Dunnet = 0,04<br />
Averages followed by distinct letters, lowercase on the line and uppercase in the column, differ by Tukey test at 0.05 significance; ns not<br />
significant by the Dunnett test at 0.05 significance, * significant by the Dunnett test at 0 05 significance;<br />
Table 11.1.4.2: K Content in Soil (Mehlich 1) After 60 Days of Incubation with Different<br />
Sources of Potassium in a Sandy Soil.<br />
Dose K 2 O<br />
Source<br />
kg ha -1 KCl Thermo-K <strong>Verde</strong>te<br />
Average<br />
0 0,04<br />
200 0,25 * a B 0,24 * a B 0,04 ns b A 0,18<br />
400 0,41 * a A 0,38 * a A 0,04 ns b A 0,28<br />
Average 0,33 0,31 0,<strong>43</strong><br />
CV% = 12,89<br />
DMS dose = 0,04; DMS source = 0,05; DMS Dunnet = 0,05<br />
Averages followed by distinct letters, lowercase on the line and uppercase in the column, differ by Tukey test at 0.05 significance; ns not<br />
significant by the Dunnett test at 0.05 significance, * significant by the Dunnett test at 0 05 significance;<br />
In addition to potassium addition the application of Thermo-K also appears to increase available<br />
Ca and Mg in the soil after 60 days of incubation. Presumably, magnesium is also released from<br />
clays in the <strong>Verde</strong>te and Ca is present as lime from calcining of limestone in the kiln (Tables<br />
11.1.4.3 through 11.1.4.6). Further with a higher application mass of Thermo-K (400kg/ha)<br />
greater availability of Ca and Mg was also observed. Potassium chloride did not affect the Ca<br />
and Mg in the soil because it simply does not have these elements in their composition.<br />
The <strong>Verde</strong>te, however, despite containing Ca and Mg in its composition, did not increase the<br />
levels of these elements in the soil, strengthening the conclusion that the <strong>Verde</strong>te has low<br />
reactivity and is not able to release nutrients to the soil in the short term.<br />
SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. September 16, 2011<br />
Cerrado <strong>Verde</strong>_<strong>NI</strong> <strong>43</strong>-<strong>101</strong> PEA_3<strong>43</strong>500.020_007_KG