coleman-the-rothschild-dynasty

114 Dr. John Coleman
a heavy load of indirect responsibility was on the heads
of the people of the United Kingdom; for the Zionists
would not have had in A.D. 1948 the opportunity to
conquer an Arab country in which they had what
amounted to no more than an inconsiderable minority in
A.D. 1918 if during the intervening thirty years, the
power of the United Kingdom had not been exerted
continuously to make possible the entry of Jewish
immigrants into Palestine, contrary to the will, in despite
of the protests and without regard to the forebodings of
the Arab inhabitants of the country who in A.D. 1918,
were duly to become the victims of this long pursued
British policy.
Lawrence of Arabia (Colonel Lawrence), who could less
still be accused of anti-Jewish bias or smeared as "anti Semitic"
did not remain silent over the betrayal of his commitment to the
Arabs:
If we won the war, the promises to the Arabs were dead
paper. Yet the Arab inspiration was our main tool in
winning the Eastern War. So I assured them that England
kept her word in letter and in spirit. In this comfort they
performed their fine things; but, of course, instead of
being proud of what we did together, I was bitterly
ashamed.
Other voices added to what Lawrence had expressed as a
feeling of utter betrayal, among them, O'Grady:
Colonel Lawrence had good reason to be ashamed. While
the Arabs were fighting and dying for England, Britain's
Foreign Minister, Arthur Balfour was bartering Palestine
for a Jewish pledge to bring the United States into the war
on England's side. In