sign101
sign101
sign101
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A small prospective observational study in 40 children suggested that serial measurements<br />
of FENO and/or sputum eosinophilia may guide step down of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). 844<br />
Another small study of 40 children showed that a rising FENO predicted relapse after cessation<br />
of ICS . 840 The number of children involved in these step-down and cessation studies is small<br />
and the results should be interpreted with some caution until replicated in larger datasets.<br />
A better understanding of the natural variability of biomarkers independent of asthma is required<br />
and studies are needed to establish whether subgroups of patients can be identified in which<br />
biomarker guided management is effective. Table 8 summarises the methodology, measurement<br />
characteristics and interpretation of some of the validated tools used to assess symptoms and<br />
other aspects of asthma.<br />
Clinical issues<br />
When assessing asthma control a general question, such as “how is your asthma today?”, is likely<br />
to yield a non-specific answer; “I am ok”. Using closed questions, such as “do you use your<br />
blue inhaler every day?”, is likely to yield more useful information. As in any chronic disease<br />
of childhood, it is good practice to monitor growth at least annually in children diagnosed with<br />
asthma.<br />
; When assessing asthma control use closed questions.<br />
; Growth (height and weight centile) should be monitored at least anually in children with<br />
asthma.<br />
; Practitioners should be aware that the best predictor of future exacerbations is current<br />
control.<br />
2.6.2 MONITORING ASTHMA IN ADULTS<br />
In the majority of patients with asthma symptom-based monitoring is adequate. Patients achieving<br />
control of symptoms with treatment have a low risk for exacerbations. 107 Patients with poor<br />
lung function and with a history of exacerbations in the previous year may be at greater risk of<br />
future exacerbations for a given level of symptoms.<br />
; Closer monitoring of individuals with poor lung function and with a history of<br />
exacerbations in the previous year should be considered.<br />
In two small studies in a hospital based population, one of which only included patients<br />
with severe and difficult asthma, a management strategy that controlled eosinophilic<br />
airway inflammation resulted in less exacerbations. 84-86 A strategy which controlled airways<br />
responsiveness resulted in a much higher dosage of inhaled corticosteroids and slightly less<br />
exacerbations. 108 More research is needed before these strategies can be recommended for<br />
widespread use.<br />
Table 8 summarises the methodology, measurement characteristics and interpretation of some<br />
of the validated tools used to assess symptoms and other aspects of asthma. Some measures<br />
provide information about future risk and potential corticosteroid responsiveness (ie sputum<br />
eosinophil count, airway responsiveness and FENO) rather than immediate clinical control. Risk<br />
reduction, eg minimising future adverse outcomes such as exacerbations is an important goal<br />
of asthma management. Some patients have an accelerated decline in lung function in terms of<br />
FEv ; risk factors and treatment strategies for these patients are poorly defined. Further research<br />
1<br />
in this area is an important priority.<br />
; When assessing asthma control in adults use specific questions, such as “how many<br />
days a week do you use your blue inhaler?”.<br />
2 diAGnosis<br />
21