sign101
sign101
sign101
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7.9.2 AT-RISK POPULATIONS<br />
Several hundred agents have been reported to cause occupational asthma and new causes are<br />
reported regularly in the medical literature.<br />
The most frequently reported causative agents include isocyanates, flour and grain dust,<br />
colophony and fluxes, latex, animals, aldehydes and wood dust. 557-565<br />
The workers most commonly reported to occupational asthma surveillance schemes include<br />
paint sprayers, bakers and pastry makers, nurses, chemical workers, animal handlers, welders,<br />
food processing workers and timber workers. 557,558,560,562-568<br />
Workers reported to be at increased risk of developing asthma include bakers, food processors,<br />
forestry workers, chemical workers, plastics and rubber workers, metal workers, welders, textile<br />
workers, electrical and electronic production workers, storage workers, farm workers, waiters,<br />
cleaners, painters, dental workers and laboratory technicians. 569-572<br />
7.9.3 DIAGNOSIS<br />
Occupational asthma should be considered in all workers with symptoms of airflow limitation.<br />
The best screening question to ask is whether symptoms improve on days away from work.<br />
This is more sensitive than asking whether symptoms are worse at work, as many symptoms<br />
deteriorate in the hours after work or during sleep.<br />
; Adults with airflow obstruction should be asked:<br />
Are you better on days away from work?<br />
Are you better on holiday?<br />
Those with positive answers should be investigated for occupational asthma.<br />
These questions are not specific for occupational asthma and also identify those with asthma<br />
due to agents at home (who may improve on holidays), and those who do much less physical<br />
exertion away from work. 573<br />
Occupational asthma can be present when tests of lung function are normal, limiting their use<br />
as a screening tool. Asthmatic symptoms improving away from work can produce false negative<br />
diagnoses, so further validation is needed.<br />
Serial measurement of peak respiratory flow is the most readily available initial investigation, and<br />
the sensitivity and specificity of serial peak flow measurement in the diagnosis of occupational<br />
asthma are high. 574-580<br />
Although skin prick tests or blood tests for specific IgE are available, there are few standardized<br />
allergens commercially available which limits their use. A positive test denotes sensitisation,<br />
which can occur with or without disease. The diagnosis of occupational asthma can usually<br />
be made without specific bronchial provocation testing, considered to be the gold standard<br />
diagnostic test. The availability of centres with expertise and facilities for specific provocation<br />
testing is very limited in the UK and the test itself is time consuming.<br />
As a general observation, the history is more useful in excluding occupational asthma than in<br />
confirming it. A significant proportion of workers with symptoms that improve on days away<br />
from work or on holiday have been shown by objective tests not to have occupational asthma. 581<br />
Expert histories have poor specificity compared with specific challenge testing. Free histories<br />
taken by experts have high sensitivity but their specificity is lower. 582-587<br />
d In suspected work-related asthma, the diagnosis of asthma should be confirmed using<br />
standard objective criteria.<br />
7 sPeCiAl situAtions<br />
2 ++<br />
2 +<br />
3<br />
3<br />
91