17.11.2012 Views

sign101

sign101

sign101

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.9.2 AT-RISK POPULATIONS<br />

Several hundred agents have been reported to cause occupational asthma and new causes are<br />

reported regularly in the medical literature.<br />

The most frequently reported causative agents include isocyanates, flour and grain dust,<br />

colophony and fluxes, latex, animals, aldehydes and wood dust. 557-565<br />

The workers most commonly reported to occupational asthma surveillance schemes include<br />

paint sprayers, bakers and pastry makers, nurses, chemical workers, animal handlers, welders,<br />

food processing workers and timber workers. 557,558,560,562-568<br />

Workers reported to be at increased risk of developing asthma include bakers, food processors,<br />

forestry workers, chemical workers, plastics and rubber workers, metal workers, welders, textile<br />

workers, electrical and electronic production workers, storage workers, farm workers, waiters,<br />

cleaners, painters, dental workers and laboratory technicians. 569-572<br />

7.9.3 DIAGNOSIS<br />

Occupational asthma should be considered in all workers with symptoms of airflow limitation.<br />

The best screening question to ask is whether symptoms improve on days away from work.<br />

This is more sensitive than asking whether symptoms are worse at work, as many symptoms<br />

deteriorate in the hours after work or during sleep.<br />

; Adults with airflow obstruction should be asked:<br />

Are you better on days away from work?<br />

Are you better on holiday?<br />

Those with positive answers should be investigated for occupational asthma.<br />

These questions are not specific for occupational asthma and also identify those with asthma<br />

due to agents at home (who may improve on holidays), and those who do much less physical<br />

exertion away from work. 573<br />

Occupational asthma can be present when tests of lung function are normal, limiting their use<br />

as a screening tool. Asthmatic symptoms improving away from work can produce false negative<br />

diagnoses, so further validation is needed.<br />

Serial measurement of peak respiratory flow is the most readily available initial investigation, and<br />

the sensitivity and specificity of serial peak flow measurement in the diagnosis of occupational<br />

asthma are high. 574-580<br />

Although skin prick tests or blood tests for specific IgE are available, there are few standardized<br />

allergens commercially available which limits their use. A positive test denotes sensitisation,<br />

which can occur with or without disease. The diagnosis of occupational asthma can usually<br />

be made without specific bronchial provocation testing, considered to be the gold standard<br />

diagnostic test. The availability of centres with expertise and facilities for specific provocation<br />

testing is very limited in the UK and the test itself is time consuming.<br />

As a general observation, the history is more useful in excluding occupational asthma than in<br />

confirming it. A significant proportion of workers with symptoms that improve on days away<br />

from work or on holiday have been shown by objective tests not to have occupational asthma. 581<br />

Expert histories have poor specificity compared with specific challenge testing. Free histories<br />

taken by experts have high sensitivity but their specificity is lower. 582-587<br />

d In suspected work-related asthma, the diagnosis of asthma should be confirmed using<br />

standard objective criteria.<br />

7 sPeCiAl situAtions<br />

2 ++<br />

2 +<br />

3<br />

3<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!