14.06.2015 Views

sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust

sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust

sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Law</strong> Reform<br />

Article 17 and 126 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution be amended enlarging<br />

the scope <strong>of</strong> locus standi in fundamental Rights applications. 184<br />

III.14<br />

Returned detainees be permitted to make applications, despite<br />

the lapse <strong>of</strong> time, in terms <strong>of</strong> Article 11 and Article 13 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution, through the Legal Advisory (Assistance) Service<br />

Bureau. 185 III.15<br />

Principle 34 <strong>of</strong> the UN Body <strong>of</strong> Principles for the Protection <strong>of</strong><br />

all Persons under any form <strong>of</strong> Detention or Imprisonment be<br />

incorporated in the Constitution. IV. 18<br />

Constitutional right to be declared in any person to petition<br />

the Supreme Court through Human Rights Task Force (HRTF)<br />

regarding unauthorized places <strong>of</strong> detention. 186 IV.17<br />

Legislative measures be taken to address the foregoing<br />

issues [with regard to relief] if they cannot be dealt with by<br />

administrative action. I.12(i)<br />

All Island,<br />

Final (83)<br />

All Island,<br />

Final (83)<br />

Southern, Final<br />

(175)<br />

Southern, Final<br />

(175)<br />

Southern, Final<br />

(171)<br />

2001<br />

2001<br />

1997<br />

1997<br />

1997<br />

184.<br />

The Supreme Court however has extended locus standi to dependants and lawful heirs <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> custodial deaths in the cases <strong>of</strong> Sriyani<br />

Silva v. Iddamalgoda, OIC Paiyagala [2003] 1 Sri LR 14 and Lama Hewage Lal, Rani Fernando and Others v. OIC Seeduwa [2005] 1 Sri LR<br />

140.<br />

185.<br />

The Supreme Court used the concept <strong>of</strong> ‘continuing infringement’ in the case <strong>of</strong> Sasanasiritissa Thera and Others v. de Silva and Others<br />

[1989] 2 Sri LR 356, to grant relief to a person who filed a Fundamental Rights petition after one month from the date <strong>of</strong> the order for arrest<br />

had lapsed, although one month had not lapsed from the date <strong>of</strong> release.<br />

186.<br />

Neither the HRTF nor its successor, the National Human Rights Commission have/had standing to petition the Supreme Court. The relevant<br />

rules to be prescribed by Court in this respect have not been prescribed.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!