14.06.2015 Views

sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust

sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust

sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were cognizant <strong>of</strong> the dilemma presented by this situation, and thus<br />

the <strong>inquiry</strong> did not encompass the persons already tried by Court,<br />

whether convicted or acquitted. “It could not have been otherwise. It<br />

was unreasonable to have expected the Commission <strong>of</strong> Inquiry to reexamine<br />

the questions which had been finally decided by an order <strong>of</strong><br />

the highest judicial authority <strong>of</strong> the Country.” 6 It therefore proceeded<br />

on the case “as finally established in the Court proceedings as a<br />

fixed basis.” 7 With regard to the individuals acquitted by Court, the<br />

Commission was <strong>of</strong> the view that “as they had both faced a long <strong>inquiry</strong><br />

followed by a long trial in a criminal court, we [the Commission] felt<br />

that they should be permitted to enjoy the results <strong>of</strong> the verdict they<br />

were able to obtain in the Court proceedings and that they should not<br />

be vexed a second time at our <strong>inquiry</strong>.” 8<br />

The Commission envisaged serious consequences stemming from any<br />

adverse findings. The Report states that, “the functions that devolve on us<br />

by our present Commission are substantially not dissimilar to those that<br />

devolve on a Court or other judicial tribunal. For that reason and also on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the circumstance that the consequence <strong>of</strong> adverse findings by<br />

us can be serious or damaging to individuals, we decided to adhere, so far<br />

as practicable, to procedure obtaining in a Court <strong>of</strong> Justice.” 9<br />

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />

The Report does not include any specific recommendations apart from<br />

the recommendation that the law on contempt be amended in relation<br />

to its application to Commissions <strong>of</strong> Inquiry. 10<br />

6.<br />

Bandaranaike Report, p. 8.<br />

7.<br />

Bandaranaike Report, p. 8.<br />

8.<br />

Bandaranaike Report, p. 12.<br />

9.<br />

Bandaranaike Report, p. 10.<br />

10.<br />

“…we think it necessary, in order to enable [commissioners] to perform their functions<br />

efficiently and with independence and so better secure the public interest, to extend the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> contempt against or in disrespect <strong>of</strong> the authority <strong>of</strong> the Commission to certain<br />

other acts or omissions….” Bandaranaike Report, p. 5.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!