sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust
sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust
sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
were cognizant <strong>of</strong> the dilemma presented by this situation, and thus<br />
the <strong>inquiry</strong> did not encompass the persons already tried by Court,<br />
whether convicted or acquitted. “It could not have been otherwise. It<br />
was unreasonable to have expected the Commission <strong>of</strong> Inquiry to reexamine<br />
the questions which had been finally decided by an order <strong>of</strong><br />
the highest judicial authority <strong>of</strong> the Country.” 6 It therefore proceeded<br />
on the case “as finally established in the Court proceedings as a<br />
fixed basis.” 7 With regard to the individuals acquitted by Court, the<br />
Commission was <strong>of</strong> the view that “as they had both faced a long <strong>inquiry</strong><br />
followed by a long trial in a criminal court, we [the Commission] felt<br />
that they should be permitted to enjoy the results <strong>of</strong> the verdict they<br />
were able to obtain in the Court proceedings and that they should not<br />
be vexed a second time at our <strong>inquiry</strong>.” 8<br />
The Commission envisaged serious consequences stemming from any<br />
adverse findings. The Report states that, “the functions that devolve on us<br />
by our present Commission are substantially not dissimilar to those that<br />
devolve on a Court or other judicial tribunal. For that reason and also on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> the circumstance that the consequence <strong>of</strong> adverse findings by<br />
us can be serious or damaging to individuals, we decided to adhere, so far<br />
as practicable, to procedure obtaining in a Court <strong>of</strong> Justice.” 9<br />
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />
The Report does not include any specific recommendations apart from<br />
the recommendation that the law on contempt be amended in relation<br />
to its application to Commissions <strong>of</strong> Inquiry. 10<br />
6.<br />
Bandaranaike Report, p. 8.<br />
7.<br />
Bandaranaike Report, p. 8.<br />
8.<br />
Bandaranaike Report, p. 12.<br />
9.<br />
Bandaranaike Report, p. 10.<br />
10.<br />
“…we think it necessary, in order to enable [commissioners] to perform their functions<br />
efficiently and with independence and so better secure the public interest, to extend the<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> contempt against or in disrespect <strong>of</strong> the authority <strong>of</strong> the Commission to certain<br />
other acts or omissions….” Bandaranaike Report, p. 5.<br />
8