sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust
sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust
sri lanka's commissions of inquiry - Law & Society Trust
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
yet occurred, thus suggesting that the creation <strong>of</strong> the Commissions<br />
was pretense. The effect was to render the Commissions ineffectual<br />
from the moment <strong>of</strong> their inception. In fact subsequently, in 1993,<br />
their warrants were revoked, thereby obfuscating their very existence.<br />
Reportedly, however, the Commission(s) “had submitted reports on at<br />
least one hundred and forty two cases <strong>of</strong> disappearance to successive<br />
presidents between January 1991 and the end <strong>of</strong> 1994. In some cases<br />
at least, the reports are believed to contain evidence implicating<br />
individual <strong>of</strong>ficers in perpetrating disappearances.” 33<br />
4.2 PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO<br />
INVOLUNTARY REMOVALS: PRESIDENT WIJETUNGA<br />
(1993)<br />
After President Premadasa was assassinated on May 1, 1993, the<br />
then Prime Minister, D.B. Wijetunga, assumed power as President <strong>of</strong><br />
Sri Lanka. Subsequently, on August 23, 1993, President Wijetunga<br />
revoked the warrants <strong>of</strong> the three prior Commissions <strong>of</strong> Inquiry<br />
and appointed another Commission into Involuntary Removals <strong>of</strong><br />
Persons 34 . The mandate <strong>of</strong> this Commission was in respect <strong>of</strong> past<br />
involuntary removals – those occurring during the period <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong><br />
33.<br />
Nissan, Elizabeth,“Impunity,” Sri Lanka State <strong>of</strong> Human Rights 1994 (<strong>Law</strong> & <strong>Society</strong><br />
<strong>Trust</strong>, 1995), p. 114.<br />
34.<br />
The Gazette <strong>of</strong> the Democratic Socialist Republic <strong>of</strong> Sri Lanka, Extraordinary, No. 784/1<br />
<strong>of</strong> September 13, 1993. The Commission appointed by Wijetunga was mandated to inquire<br />
into the following:<br />
Schedule “A”<br />
(i) whether such illegal acts took place by reason <strong>of</strong> any lack <strong>of</strong> legal provision in the<br />
present laws relating to law enforcement;<br />
(ii) the remedial measures necessary to prevent the future occurrence <strong>of</strong> such illegal<br />
activity.<br />
Schedule “B”<br />
(i) any complaints <strong>of</strong> such alleged removals, and/or the subsequent lack <strong>of</strong> information <strong>of</strong><br />
the whereabouts <strong>of</strong> the person or persons so removed;<br />
(ii) the credibility <strong>of</strong> such complaint;<br />
(iii) your recommendation as to whether or not further investigations into such complaints<br />
are warranted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> the institution <strong>of</strong> legal proceedings.<br />
21