Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS
Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS
Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
features. We based extensive surveys on visual<br />
encounters (Crump <strong>and</strong> Scott 1994) <strong>and</strong>, in<br />
contrast to intensive surveys, did not constrain<br />
surveys by area or time. We focused extensive<br />
surveys during mornings <strong>and</strong> also surveyed<br />
during evenings <strong>and</strong> nights in low-elevation areas<br />
when detectability <strong>of</strong> snakes <strong>and</strong> amphibians is<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten highest (Ivanyi et al. 2000), <strong>and</strong> during midday<br />
at higher elevations.<br />
Field Methods<br />
We selected areas r<strong>and</strong>omly <strong>and</strong> non-r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />
(Table 4.1). We placed r<strong>and</strong>om survey areas<br />
within approximately 1 to 2 km <strong>of</strong> focal point<br />
transects, <strong>and</strong> surveyed each area once. We<br />
selected non-r<strong>and</strong>om areas by using topographic<br />
maps <strong>and</strong> prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> the district. We<br />
relied upon visual detection <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten looked<br />
under objects <strong>and</strong> illuminated cracks to detect<br />
hidden individuals. We surveyed in spring (4<br />
April – 24 May) <strong>and</strong> summer (25 June – 20<br />
September) <strong>of</strong> 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002. One, two, or three<br />
observers searched each area simultaneously<br />
<strong>and</strong> recorded data separately. Total duration <strong>of</strong><br />
surveys among all observers combined averaged<br />
5.5 ± 0.4 (± SE) hours per survey (range = 1.2<br />
- 20.4 hours). We recorded data using similar<br />
methods as intensive surveys <strong>and</strong> noted UTM<br />
coordinates <strong>and</strong> elevation at the start <strong>and</strong> end<br />
points <strong>of</strong> each survey.<br />
Effort<br />
We surveyed 85 areas in 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002 (Fig.<br />
4.2), 94.1% <strong>of</strong> which were surveyed in 2001<br />
(Table 4.2). Total survey effort was 465.2 hours,<br />
81% <strong>of</strong> which was in non-r<strong>and</strong>om areas. Survey<br />
effort was roughly three times greater than<br />
for other methods <strong>and</strong> focused mainly during<br />
daylight except at lower elevations where we also<br />
surveyed during late evenings <strong>and</strong> nights. We did<br />
not survey higher elevation areas in late evenings<br />
<strong>and</strong> at night because detectability declined<br />
markedly with elevation.<br />
Analysis<br />
We calculated relative abundance for each area<br />
as the number <strong>of</strong> individuals detected for each<br />
species or all species combined per 10 hours <strong>of</strong><br />
effort. For surveys completed by >1 observer<br />
31<br />
per area, we summed survey times <strong>and</strong> detection<br />
data for all surveyors when calculating effort <strong>and</strong><br />
relative abundance for an area. Although some<br />
locations were surveyed multiple times, survey<br />
routes <strong>of</strong>ten varied <strong>and</strong> we therefore considered<br />
each survey an independent sample despite some<br />
spatial overlap. To describe general patterns <strong>of</strong><br />
relative abundance for species groups (lizards,<br />
snakes, <strong>and</strong> amphibians) <strong>and</strong> species richness<br />
across the district, we post-stratified survey<br />
areas by elevation (low = 6,000 feet) using the<br />
median elevation <strong>of</strong> all animal observations for<br />
each survey. We then tested for variation among<br />
strata using one-, two-, or multi-way ANOVA.<br />
Because relative abundance <strong>and</strong> species richness<br />
varied between day <strong>and</strong> night <strong>and</strong> no areas<br />
were surveyed during night at middle <strong>and</strong> high<br />
elevations, we limited comparisons only to<br />
days. To describe patterns <strong>of</strong> relative abundance<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual species across elevation, we used<br />
multiple linear regression. We transformed<br />
relative abundance values when necessary<br />
using log(x) or log(x + 1) to improve normality.<br />
Because patterns <strong>of</strong> relative abundance <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
varied with relative humidity (or cloud cover),<br />
season, <strong>and</strong> time <strong>of</strong> day, we adjusted for these<br />
factors when they explained variation (P ≤<br />
0.10) in relative abundance. To describe cloud<br />
cover, relative humidity, <strong>and</strong> temperature for<br />
each area, we averaged measurements taken at<br />
the beginning <strong>and</strong> end <strong>of</strong> each survey. To adjust<br />
for temporal variation in relative abundance<br />
<strong>and</strong> richness across time <strong>of</strong> day, we considered<br />
three time periods: day, late evening or night, or<br />
surveys that spanned portions <strong>of</strong> both periods<br />
(day equaled reference level). We considered<br />
20-min before local sunset time as the cut-point<br />
between day <strong>and</strong> late evening or night surveys.<br />
To adjust for seasonal variation in relative<br />
abundance <strong>and</strong> richness, we considered two<br />
seasons, spring <strong>and</strong> summer (spring equaled<br />
reference level). Because relative humidity <strong>and</strong><br />
cloud cover were strongly correlated (r = 0.76,<br />
P < 0.0001) we only adjusted for the factor that<br />
explained the most variation in responses.