17.11.2012 Views

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

features. We based extensive surveys on visual<br />

encounters (Crump <strong>and</strong> Scott 1994) <strong>and</strong>, in<br />

contrast to intensive surveys, did not constrain<br />

surveys by area or time. We focused extensive<br />

surveys during mornings <strong>and</strong> also surveyed<br />

during evenings <strong>and</strong> nights in low-elevation areas<br />

when detectability <strong>of</strong> snakes <strong>and</strong> amphibians is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten highest (Ivanyi et al. 2000), <strong>and</strong> during midday<br />

at higher elevations.<br />

Field Methods<br />

We selected areas r<strong>and</strong>omly <strong>and</strong> non-r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />

(Table 4.1). We placed r<strong>and</strong>om survey areas<br />

within approximately 1 to 2 km <strong>of</strong> focal point<br />

transects, <strong>and</strong> surveyed each area once. We<br />

selected non-r<strong>and</strong>om areas by using topographic<br />

maps <strong>and</strong> prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> the district. We<br />

relied upon visual detection <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten looked<br />

under objects <strong>and</strong> illuminated cracks to detect<br />

hidden individuals. We surveyed in spring (4<br />

April – 24 May) <strong>and</strong> summer (25 June – 20<br />

September) <strong>of</strong> 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002. One, two, or three<br />

observers searched each area simultaneously<br />

<strong>and</strong> recorded data separately. Total duration <strong>of</strong><br />

surveys among all observers combined averaged<br />

5.5 ± 0.4 (± SE) hours per survey (range = 1.2<br />

- 20.4 hours). We recorded data using similar<br />

methods as intensive surveys <strong>and</strong> noted UTM<br />

coordinates <strong>and</strong> elevation at the start <strong>and</strong> end<br />

points <strong>of</strong> each survey.<br />

Effort<br />

We surveyed 85 areas in 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002 (Fig.<br />

4.2), 94.1% <strong>of</strong> which were surveyed in 2001<br />

(Table 4.2). Total survey effort was 465.2 hours,<br />

81% <strong>of</strong> which was in non-r<strong>and</strong>om areas. Survey<br />

effort was roughly three times greater than<br />

for other methods <strong>and</strong> focused mainly during<br />

daylight except at lower elevations where we also<br />

surveyed during late evenings <strong>and</strong> nights. We did<br />

not survey higher elevation areas in late evenings<br />

<strong>and</strong> at night because detectability declined<br />

markedly with elevation.<br />

Analysis<br />

We calculated relative abundance for each area<br />

as the number <strong>of</strong> individuals detected for each<br />

species or all species combined per 10 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

effort. For surveys completed by >1 observer<br />

31<br />

per area, we summed survey times <strong>and</strong> detection<br />

data for all surveyors when calculating effort <strong>and</strong><br />

relative abundance for an area. Although some<br />

locations were surveyed multiple times, survey<br />

routes <strong>of</strong>ten varied <strong>and</strong> we therefore considered<br />

each survey an independent sample despite some<br />

spatial overlap. To describe general patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

relative abundance for species groups (lizards,<br />

snakes, <strong>and</strong> amphibians) <strong>and</strong> species richness<br />

across the district, we post-stratified survey<br />

areas by elevation (low = 6,000 feet) using the<br />

median elevation <strong>of</strong> all animal observations for<br />

each survey. We then tested for variation among<br />

strata using one-, two-, or multi-way ANOVA.<br />

Because relative abundance <strong>and</strong> species richness<br />

varied between day <strong>and</strong> night <strong>and</strong> no areas<br />

were surveyed during night at middle <strong>and</strong> high<br />

elevations, we limited comparisons only to<br />

days. To describe patterns <strong>of</strong> relative abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> individual species across elevation, we used<br />

multiple linear regression. We transformed<br />

relative abundance values when necessary<br />

using log(x) or log(x + 1) to improve normality.<br />

Because patterns <strong>of</strong> relative abundance <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

varied with relative humidity (or cloud cover),<br />

season, <strong>and</strong> time <strong>of</strong> day, we adjusted for these<br />

factors when they explained variation (P ≤<br />

0.10) in relative abundance. To describe cloud<br />

cover, relative humidity, <strong>and</strong> temperature for<br />

each area, we averaged measurements taken at<br />

the beginning <strong>and</strong> end <strong>of</strong> each survey. To adjust<br />

for temporal variation in relative abundance<br />

<strong>and</strong> richness across time <strong>of</strong> day, we considered<br />

three time periods: day, late evening or night, or<br />

surveys that spanned portions <strong>of</strong> both periods<br />

(day equaled reference level). We considered<br />

20-min before local sunset time as the cut-point<br />

between day <strong>and</strong> late evening or night surveys.<br />

To adjust for seasonal variation in relative<br />

abundance <strong>and</strong> richness, we considered two<br />

seasons, spring <strong>and</strong> summer (spring equaled<br />

reference level). Because relative humidity <strong>and</strong><br />

cloud cover were strongly correlated (r = 0.76,<br />

P < 0.0001) we only adjusted for the factor that<br />

explained the most variation in responses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!