17.11.2012 Views

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5: Bird <strong>Inventory</strong><br />

Brian F. Powell<br />

Previous Research<br />

There has been considerable bird research at the<br />

Rincon Mountain District, but no comprehensive<br />

<strong>and</strong> well-documented inventory has been<br />

completed. Monson <strong>and</strong> Smith (1985) compiled<br />

a checklist for both districts <strong>of</strong> the park, but there<br />

is no documentation <strong>of</strong> the data used to create<br />

that list. The list includes abundance categories<br />

for each major vegetation community <strong>and</strong> this<br />

information was likely based on Gale Monson’s<br />

extensive knowledge <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>and</strong><br />

relative abundance <strong>of</strong> birds in similar vegetation<br />

communities in the region.<br />

A few studies have investigated<br />

songbird community composition in the Sonoran<br />

desertscrub on the west side <strong>of</strong> the district near<br />

the Cactus Forest Loop Drive (Johnson <strong>and</strong><br />

Haight 1991, see also Mannan <strong>and</strong> Bibles 1989)<br />

<strong>and</strong> in the Rincon Valley (Boal <strong>and</strong> Mannan 1996,<br />

Freiderici 1998, Powell 1999, 2004). Only two<br />

multi-species, non-raptor studies have taken place<br />

in the higher elevations <strong>of</strong> the district (Marshall<br />

1956, Short 2002) <strong>and</strong> no research has taken<br />

place in the mid-elevation areas <strong>of</strong> the district or<br />

on the east slope <strong>of</strong> the Rincon Mountains. In the<br />

1980s the park was concerned about the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

non-native cavity-nesting birds on native species<br />

<strong>and</strong> they commissioned studies to investigate<br />

this (Mannan <strong>and</strong> Bibles 1989, Kerpez <strong>and</strong> Smith<br />

1990). Because <strong>of</strong> the active fire management<br />

program, park personnel have been interested<br />

in the effects <strong>of</strong> fire on the Mexican spotted owl<br />

(Willey 1998) <strong>and</strong> songbirds (Short 2002) in the<br />

high elevation areas <strong>of</strong> the district. The park<br />

contracted for periodic raptor surveys (Felley <strong>and</strong><br />

Corman 1993, Berner <strong>and</strong> Mannan 1992, Bailey<br />

1994, Griscom 2000). Park personnel surveyed<br />

three Breeding Bird Atlas blocks within the<br />

district (Short 1996) <strong>and</strong> those results are reported<br />

in Corman <strong>and</strong> Wise Gervais (2005). The Tucson<br />

Bird Count includes three low-elevation sites in<br />

the park, including Rincon Creek (TBC 2005).<br />

Single species studies have included the elf owl<br />

(Goad <strong>and</strong> Mannan 1987, Steidl 2003), Mexican<br />

spotted owl (Willey 1997, 1998b, Anderson<br />

45<br />

<strong>and</strong> Schon 1999, Steidl <strong>and</strong> Knipps 1999), buffbreasted<br />

flycatcher (Conway <strong>and</strong> Kirkpatrick<br />

2001; they also noted other species; Kirkpatrick<br />

et al. 2006), <strong>and</strong> purple martin (Stutchbury 1991).<br />

Park personnel survey periodically for the cactus<br />

ferruginous pygmy-owl <strong>and</strong> Mexican spotted<br />

owl <strong>and</strong> park staff file annual reports to the U.S.<br />

Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service (<strong>Saguaro</strong> NP, unpubl.<br />

reports) on monitoring <strong>and</strong> relevant management<br />

activities related to these species.<br />

Methods<br />

We surveyed for birds at the Rincon Mountain<br />

District from 2001 to 2003, though most <strong>of</strong> our<br />

surveys took place in the springs <strong>of</strong> 2001 <strong>and</strong><br />

2002. We used four field methods: (1) variable<br />

circular-plot (VCP) counts for diurnal breeding<br />

<strong>and</strong> spring migrant birds, (2) nocturnal surveys<br />

for owls <strong>and</strong> nightjars (breeding season), (3) line<br />

transects for diurnal birds in the non-breeding<br />

season, <strong>and</strong> (4) incidental observations for all<br />

birds in all seasons. Although line-transect<br />

surveys were not included in the original study<br />

proposal (Davis <strong>and</strong> Halvorson 2000), we felt<br />

they were important in our effort to inventory<br />

birds at the district because many species that<br />

use the area during the fall <strong>and</strong> winter may not<br />

be present during breeding-season surveys.<br />

Nevertheless, we concentrated our primary<br />

survey effort on the breeding season because bird<br />

distribution is relatively uniform in that season<br />

due to territoriality (Bibby et al. 2002). Our<br />

survey period included peak spring migration<br />

times for most species, which added many<br />

migratory birds to our list.<br />

We sampled vegetation around most<br />

VCP stations. Vegetation structure <strong>and</strong> plant<br />

species composition are important predictors <strong>of</strong><br />

bird species richness or the presence <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

species (MacArthur <strong>and</strong> MacArthur 1961, Rice et<br />

al. 1984, Strong <strong>and</strong> Bock 1990). In this report<br />

we use these data to categorize <strong>and</strong> describe bird<br />

communities. These data will also be useful for<br />

habitat association studies (e.g., Strong <strong>and</strong> Bock<br />

1990; see Appendix H for results).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!