17.11.2012 Views

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6.4. Results <strong>of</strong> netting for bats, by elevation strata, site, <strong>and</strong> visit, <strong>Saguaro</strong> National Park, Rincon<br />

Mountain District, 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002.<br />

Low Middle High<br />

Chimenea<br />

Wild Horse Deer<br />

Devil’s<br />

Creek Lower Rincon Creek<br />

Canyon Creek Manning Camp Pond Bathtub<br />

1 2 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 1<br />

Mexican long‑tongued bat 1<br />

unknown myotis 1 1<br />

southwestern myotis 2 1 1<br />

cave myotis 1 1 1<br />

fringed myotis 1 1<br />

long‑legged myotis 1 2<br />

California myotis 2 1 1 3 1<br />

silver‑haired bat 1 2 1<br />

big brown bat 4 4 2 2 2 2 5 10 19 4 1<br />

western red bat 1<br />

hoary bat 1 2 2 1 1<br />

Townsend’s big‑eared bat 1<br />

pallid bat 1<br />

Brazilian free‑tailed bat 8 2 1 1 3 1<br />

pocketed free‑tailed bat 1 1<br />

total detections by visit 2 4 16 4 0 8 9 0 1 0 7 1 12 17 21 5 3<br />

total detections by site 6 37 1 7 56 3<br />

percent netting success 3.4 7.1 0.4 7.4 19.1 11.1<br />

species richness by site 2 12 1 3 7 3<br />

Even the cave myotis, for which we found a roost<br />

<strong>of</strong> >500 individuals, was represented by only a<br />

few individuals captured by netting.<br />

Medium <strong>and</strong> Large Mammals<br />

In 3,895 estimated camera nights, 2,939<br />

photographs captured at least one mammal (not<br />

including nocturnal rodents, people, <strong>and</strong> horses<br />

with riders) <strong>and</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 3,407 individual<br />

mammals that could be identified to genus. We<br />

photographed 27 species, including two nonnative<br />

species, domestic dog <strong>and</strong> cattle (Table<br />

6.5, Appendix D). We documented one species<br />

(Virginia opossum) not previously reported<br />

for the district <strong>and</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> species<br />

for which there had previously been only<br />

observational records.<br />

The largest number <strong>of</strong> photographs<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the gray fox (1018 photos), followed<br />

by collared peccary (588 photos), <strong>and</strong> ringtail<br />

(229 photos). Species richness among elevation<br />

strata was highest in the low elevation (n = 24)<br />

<strong>and</strong> progressively lower through the elevation<br />

strata (n = 15, 13 at medium- <strong>and</strong> high-elevation<br />

stratum, respectively; Table 6.5), though effort<br />

80<br />

was disproportionate in the low-elevation stratum<br />

(Table 6.2). After accounting for camera effort,<br />

there was no difference in species richness among<br />

strata (F 2,170 = 2.0, P = 0.13, one-way ANOVA<br />

on log-transformed data), but r<strong>and</strong>om cameras<br />

did have slightly higher species richness than<br />

non-r<strong>and</strong>om camera sites (t 173 = 3.0, P = 0.003,<br />

two-tailed t-test). Among r<strong>and</strong>om sites where we<br />

placed three cameras, there were no differences<br />

in species richness among strata (F 2,67 = 1.5, P =<br />

0.23, one-way ANOVA on log-transformed data),<br />

<strong>and</strong> within these sites there were no differences<br />

among the type <strong>of</strong> camera placement (at the<br />

focal-point transects; F 2,67 = 1.1, P = 0.34, oneway<br />

ANOVA on log-transformed data).<br />

Pitfall Trapping<br />

We trapped eight animals in pitfall traps: six<br />

desert shrews at the North Slope site, one western<br />

harvest mouse, <strong>and</strong> one Botta’s pocket gopher<br />

at Italian Spring. We trapped no animals at<br />

Spud Rock Spring. In this report we assume<br />

the desert shrews we captured during this study<br />

are Crawford’s desert shrew, but further genetic<br />

work would be necessary to confirm that it is this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!