17.11.2012 Views

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Saguaro ... - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cumulative number <strong>of</strong> species<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

Sample period<br />

39<br />

All survey methods<br />

Extensive <strong>and</strong> intensive surveys<br />

Figure 4.3. Species accumulation curve for herpet<strong>of</strong>auna surveys, <strong>Saguaro</strong> National Park, Rincon<br />

Mountain District, 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002. Each sampling period represents batches <strong>of</strong> 35 individuals, the<br />

mean number <strong>of</strong> individuals observed in an eight-hour field day. “All survey methods” includes extensive,<br />

intensive, road surveys, <strong>and</strong> incidental observations. The order <strong>of</strong> all sampling periods was r<strong>and</strong>omized.<br />

were detected in Turkey, Rincon, Chimenea, <strong>and</strong><br />

Wildhorse creeks.<br />

We detected 24 species during extensive<br />

surveys that were near r<strong>and</strong>omly-selected<br />

transects (n = 22) <strong>and</strong> 38 species in non-r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

areas (n = 63) with only one new species<br />

detected in r<strong>and</strong>om areas. Species richness in<br />

non-r<strong>and</strong>om areas (5.1 ± 0.4) was similar to that<br />

in r<strong>and</strong>om areas (5.3 ± 0.6; t 83 = 0.42, P = 0.81,<br />

t-test), yet there was some evidence that richness<br />

<strong>of</strong> amphibians was greater in non-r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

areas (t 83 = 1.80, P = 0.075, t-test). Relative<br />

abundance in non-r<strong>and</strong>om survey areas (41.9 ±<br />

5.1 individuals/10 hrs) was also similar to that<br />

in r<strong>and</strong>om areas (52.3 ± 8.6; t 83 = 1.04, P = 0.30,<br />

t-test), yet there was some evidence that relative<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> lizards was greater in r<strong>and</strong>om areas<br />

(t 83 = 1.89, P = 0.065, t-test).<br />

Road Surveys<br />

We detected 688 individuals <strong>of</strong> 19 species during<br />

55 surveys totaling 46.3 hours <strong>of</strong> effort (Table<br />

4.9). We detected four amphibian species (21%<br />

<strong>of</strong> all species) totaling 515 individuals, 74.9%<br />

<strong>of</strong> all individuals detected <strong>and</strong> proportionally<br />

more amphibians than for other survey methods<br />

(Table 4.7). Reptiles included eight lizard <strong>and</strong><br />

seven snake species; 20.8% (n = 143 <strong>of</strong> 688)<br />

<strong>of</strong> individuals were lizards <strong>and</strong> 4.4% (n = 30 <strong>of</strong><br />

688) were snakes. Relative abundance averaged<br />

17.5 ± 2.7 individuals/hr (range = 0– 85.3), the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> which were the Sonoran Desert <strong>and</strong><br />

red-spotted toads.<br />

Relative abundance averaged 37.1%<br />

higher in summer than in spring (t 53 = 1.92, P =<br />

0.060, t-test) but was not necessarily attributable<br />

to an increase in amphibians during summer<br />

(t 53 = 0.79, P = 0.43, t-test). The desert spiny<br />

lizard was the most common lizard detected (89<br />

detections) <strong>and</strong> the western diamond-backed<br />

(eight detections) <strong>and</strong> tiger (six detections)<br />

rattlesnakes were the most common snake species<br />

detected.<br />

Incidental Observations<br />

We recorded 1,226 incidental detections <strong>of</strong> 44<br />

species between 3 April to 5 October 2001 <strong>and</strong><br />

2 May to 7 November 2002 (Appendix B).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!