03.07.2015 Views

July - Summer Edition - CI Investments

July - Summer Edition - CI Investments

July - Summer Edition - CI Investments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Commentary<br />

Cambridge Advisors<br />

Alan Radlo<br />

Senior Vice-President,<br />

Portfolio Management and<br />

Chief Investment Officer<br />

Investors’ growth expectations were excessive following a strong<br />

second half of 2010. However, the economy began to slow<br />

during the first part of 2011, due to sharply higher oil prices and<br />

the ripple effect of the Japan earthquake. The latter created an<br />

inventory scare, prompting many manufacturers and suppliers<br />

to increase their parts inventories to guard against possible<br />

shortages. Meanwhile, China and Brazil were attempting to<br />

slow down their over-heating markets, which removed the<br />

momentum behind emerging markets’ economic growth.<br />

Those events caused commodity prices – and values of stocks<br />

related to commodities – to adjust to the economic reality as<br />

the period progressed. This translated into a rough quarter for<br />

equity markets worldwide. The bloom came off the Canadian<br />

market, which fell 5.2% during the quarter, while markets<br />

elsewhere struggled to earn flat returns.<br />

We believe the economy is in mid-cycle slowdown, not<br />

approaching recession. Equity market liquidity is ample and<br />

corporate balance sheets are in good shape, translating into<br />

solid market fundamentals.<br />

Cambridge Canadian Equity Corporate Class suffered a<br />

small loss during the quarter, although it outperformed its<br />

benchmark. Performance was largely driven by overweight<br />

positions in industrials and consumer staples, and offset by an<br />

overweight position in information technology. The portfolio<br />

was underweight the declining energy and financials sectors,<br />

although the portfolio holds large positions in both. The<br />

fund’s largest position was in energy, where we reduced<br />

holdings in integrated oil and gas producers in favour of oil<br />

services stocks, which are less sensitive to energy prices. In<br />

financials, we continue to favour non-bank firms, adding<br />

real estate companies with financial elements, as well as<br />

insurance providers. We added to consumer staples through<br />

Shoppers Drug Mart, which became the fund’s largest<br />

individual holding. Tourmaline, Keyera and Onex made the<br />

biggest contributions to performance, while Interprovincial<br />

Pipelines was the biggest detractor.<br />

Cambridge Canadian Asset Allocation Corporate Class<br />

matched its benchmark during the quarter. Many of the<br />

fund’s equity holdings are similar to that of Cambridge<br />

Canadian Equity. We continued to avoid bonds and other<br />

fixed-income securities in favour of equity securities with<br />

excellent yields and growth potential. We increased the real<br />

estate investment trust holdings toward the end of the period.<br />

We believe that these, along with energy-related trusts, should<br />

out-distance corporate and government bonds over the next<br />

few years. Keyera, Tourmaline and Pembina made the<br />

biggest contributions to performance, while Interprovincial<br />

Pipelines was the biggest detractor.<br />

Cambridge American Equity Fund underperformed its<br />

benchmark for the three months. Cambridge Advisors was<br />

appointed portfolio manager of this fund on June 6 and we<br />

have significantly changed its holding to reflect our<br />

approach. Its focus has been shifted to industrials, information<br />

technology and health care, away from consumer<br />

discretionary, financials and consumer staples. The fund is<br />

underweight energy and financials. Baxter, HanesBrands and<br />

Sprint Nextel made the biggest contributions to performance,<br />

while JPMorgan Chase was the biggest detractor.<br />

<strong>CI</strong> Cambridge Global Equity Corporate Class<br />

outperformed its benchmark, due in part to the strength<br />

of overweight positions in health care and an underweight<br />

position in financials. Our focus was on major global<br />

technology and industrial-related companies, particularly<br />

in the laser, automotive and aerospace-related industries.<br />

Tourmaline, Volkswagen and Leoni made the biggest<br />

contributions to performance, while OGX – which we sold<br />

during the period – detracted from performance.<br />

Analysts: Greg Dean, Stephen Groff, Emi Winterer<br />

34 SUMMER 2011 PERSPECTIVE AS AT JUNE 30, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!