<strong>The</strong> <strong>Monthly</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>http://mnlreport.typepad.com/<strong>Page</strong> 108 <strong>of</strong> <strong>330</strong>7/5/<strong>2010</strong>Fanwood – (10/13/09) - Municipal leaders in Fanwood are considering an ordinance that strengthens the borough’s leash law, making it illegal for a dog to run free on private property,except in its owner’s yard.To be introduced at a borough council meeting tonight, the new ordinance revises the language <strong>of</strong> the existing dog-at-large statute. Presently, the borough’sordinance states dogs may not run <strong>of</strong>f-leash on a public street or in parks, buildings or any community space. But private properties are excluded from the statute. <strong>The</strong> council will considerapproving the ordinance at its second reading, which is expected on Nov. 10.Howell – (10/21/09) - Following months <strong>of</strong> examination, a dog ordinance that once riled the residents <strong>of</strong> Howell has been brought back to the table to largely positive reviews. <strong>The</strong> originalordinance, which was slated to have been adopted in February, would have limited the number <strong>of</strong> pets a resident is permitted to have to five dogs or cats, or a combination there<strong>of</strong>. Officialssaid the intent <strong>of</strong> the ordinance was to protect animals from abuse and neglect. <strong>The</strong> law was drafted after Monmouth County Board <strong>of</strong> Health <strong>of</strong>ficials, in conjunction with the AssociatedHumane Societies and the Monmouth County Society for the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Cruelty to Animals, removed a number <strong>of</strong> dogs from a township kennel. But pet owners rallied against the dogordinance, claiming it would punish many individuals for the misdeeds <strong>of</strong> a few. <strong>The</strong> public convinced the governing body at a Feb. 17 hearing that the measure was too broad andunconstitutional and the Township Council voted against its adoption, instead calling for the formation <strong>of</strong> a committee to explore possible solutions. <strong>The</strong>se solutions were researched over thecourse <strong>of</strong> the year by a committee <strong>of</strong> residents and experts headed by Township Attorney McKenna Kingdon. <strong>The</strong> final amended dog ordinance was a discussion item on the agenda for theOct. 6 council workshop meeting. <strong>The</strong> ordinance, as amended, establishes commercial breeders, dog kennels, shelters, pounds, training facilities and pet shops as a conditional use withinthe Special Economic Development (SED) zone and Highway Development (HD), HD-2 and HD-3 zones. It also revises the licensing requirements and definitions, which were the cause <strong>of</strong>concern among residents, regarding breeders, boarders, training facilities and pet shops. <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> the revised dog ordinance is to protect the general welfare <strong>of</strong> residents fromirresponsible dog ownership, to encourage commercial entities to locate an adequately sized property, to regulate, but not limit, the number <strong>of</strong> dogs on a property, and to recognize that dogsare not considered livestock. Kingdon elaborated on revised licensing requirements, which was also a main function <strong>of</strong> the ordinance. Although there is not a definitive date yet, the dogordinance will be on the agenda for introduction, public hearing and adoption in the coming months.Margate – (10/21/09) - After months <strong>of</strong> planning, the Margate City Dog Park will <strong>of</strong>ficially open 1 p.m. Friday with a ribbon cutting ceremony. It will be open 8 a.m. to dusk seven days a week.A planned registration last week was cancelled due to the rain, but dogs can be registered at City Hall. Owners must furnish pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> current rabies and distemper vaccines, and dogs must belicensed. Registration is $30 for one year. Deputy City Clerk Rosemarie Freed said those who register now will get the advantage <strong>of</strong> a few extra months, as their registration will be goodthrough the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>2010</strong>. A yellow tag will be given out that dogs must wear around their neck at all times in the park. Entrance to the park is via a keypad lock. Park rules state that the owneris responsible for any action <strong>of</strong> their dog and liable for any damages suffered by a person or another animal. No prong, pinch or metal choke collars are permitted, and no children under 12are permitted in the park. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional dog walkers may not use the park for pr<strong>of</strong>essional purposes, and no sick dog or dog in heat is permitted. <strong>The</strong> full set <strong>of</strong> rules is provided uponregistration.NEW MEXICORio Rancho – (10/25/09) - In October 2008, the City Council approved the formation <strong>of</strong> the Rio Rancho Animal Welfare Task Force. Our commission was to review and <strong>of</strong>fer proposedchanges to ordinances with the goal <strong>of</strong> improving animal welfare. At our initial meeting, Mayor Tom Swisstack challenged us to look into where the city needs to be in regard to protectinganimals years from now, not just where it should be today. We’ve spent hours taking public input and researching ordinances to find the ones best suited for the unique environment andculture <strong>of</strong> Rio Rancho. Other issues the task force are tackling include standards for pet stores, animal shelters, boarding kennels, grooming parlors and hobby breeders. We are creatingstandards for animal day care centers, animal rescue groups and animal foster homes. <strong>The</strong> task force has been wrestling with updating Rio Rancho’s animal ordinances for almost a year.This may seem too long for those who are anxious about animal welfare issues in our city, but it has been time well spent. <strong>The</strong> task force is doing its absolute best to consider all views andbalance the needs <strong>of</strong> our citizens with the welfare <strong>of</strong> our animals. This has been a long and <strong>of</strong>ten rocky road, but one well worth traveling because, in the end, the Task Force will present tothe mayor and City Council proposed changes that we believe best serve both the animals and citizens <strong>of</strong> Rio Rancho. [<strong>The</strong> public is welcome to attend any <strong>of</strong> the Rio Rancho AnimalWelfare Task Force meetings which are held on the first, third and fifth Mondays <strong>of</strong> the month. Each meeting has time set aside for public comment. Anyone may also contact the city staffmember assigned to the task force, Barbara Bayer, at the Meadowlark Senior Center (891-5018) or the chair <strong>of</strong> the task force, Patricia Feeser, DVM, at her <strong>of</strong>fice High Desert AnimalHospital, 892-4412.White Sands Missle Range – (10/21/09) - Responding to an increase in the on post pet population the White Sands Missile Range Police Department has assigned <strong>of</strong>ficers to enforceanimal welfare laws. All pets on WSMR are to be registered, implanted with a radio identification chip, wear a collar with identification tags, and if outside their yard, kept on a leash. While notrequired, it is strongly encouraged that all pet be spayed or neutered. Police will also be enforcing Animal welfare laws on the installation to ensure that all pets are treated properly. Animalson post should have food, plenty <strong>of</strong> clean water, proper shelter and a clean environment. Water and shelter are especially important during the hot summer months on WSMR. <strong>The</strong> penaltyfor animal neglect could cost service members areduction in rank and several hundred to several thousand dollars in fines. Civilians could end up in jail for a criminal violation. To report a violation call Police Dispatch at 678-1234.NEW YORKBethlehem – (10/15/09) - Residents on Pineridge Place are in the midst <strong>of</strong> a cat fight over feline feces that has some residents comparing their cul-de-sac to a litter box. Bolen appealed tothe town board in early September, asking them to adopt a law similar to that in Ravena. Cats in that town must be identified by tags and will be trapped if they're running at large. <strong>The</strong> town'sanimal control <strong>of</strong>ficer will return the feline to its rightful owner if it has the proper identification. <strong>The</strong> law was originally created to stop feral cats, but has also helped curb the number <strong>of</strong>domestic cats wandering town streets. <strong>The</strong> women are organizing a petition drive and want to discuss with town <strong>of</strong>ficials about town-wide cat laws that would ban owners from allowing theirfelines to run at-large.New Windsor – (10/23/09) - (Stewart Military Base) - A Marine Corps concern about breeds <strong>of</strong> dogs living on bases has prompted assessment reviews by the ASPCA. One <strong>of</strong> those reviewteams came to New Windsor Thursday to assess family dogs at the Stewart Terrace Housing adjacent to Stewart Airport where a Marine Corps Reserve unit shares the Air <strong>National</strong> GuardBase. One <strong>of</strong> the ASPCA’s SAFER animal behavior experts, Susan Britt, examined the animals. “Our invitation here was to look at six dogs on base, to evaluate them to determine whetherthey would be staying on base with their families,” she said. As <strong>of</strong> noon, she examined three <strong>of</strong> the six pit bulls and found them safe to live in their current homes.Pomfret – (10/19/09) - <strong>The</strong> Pomfret Town Board listened as Lakeshore Humane Society volunteers explained a purrr-plexing issue during its recent meeting. All kidding aside, the group <strong>of</strong> ahalf dozen volunteers was looking for the town to acknowledge what is literally a growing problem within the area. "This summer we have been inundated with phone calls from people in thetown <strong>of</strong> Pomfret community. Many people found they have homeless cats in their environment," said Lakeshore Humane Society volunteer Anne Bowers. "I am here to ask the board forsome acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> this problem. We are seeing and hearing people in Pomfret with problems that need to be addressed. I realize that includes a commitment <strong>of</strong> money and time andplanning, but it is something that we recognized." Bowers read aloud an informational sheet provided by Ally Cat Allies, the cats' leading advocate, according to its Web site. According toACA and Bowers, the Trap/Neuter/Return method is the only effective and humane way to manage feral cat populations. Pomfret Councilwoman Pat Christina, who coordinates the bi-annualrabies clinics in the town, seemed receptive to the idea and recommended that the village <strong>of</strong> Fredonia also be informed <strong>of</strong> the issue so that a joint collaboration could be made possible. <strong>The</strong>board held no further discussion on the request during their meeting Wednesday but the issue is now on the table.Southampton – (10/22/09) - Southampton Town <strong>of</strong>ficials and representatives <strong>of</strong> the Southampton Animal Shelter Foundation met last week to discuss the foundation’s bid to take overoperation and management <strong>of</strong> the shelter next year. <strong>The</strong> meeting ended with the foundation agreeing to rework its bid to reflect town requests that the foundation kick in more dollars to runthe shelter during the first year <strong>of</strong> the proposed three-year contract, Assistant Town Attorney Joseph Burke said. <strong>The</strong> foundation is chaired by Southampton philanthropist Susan Allen, whocontributed more than $1.4 million to help build the shelter in 1999. Other changes are also planned at the shelter. Ms. Kabot said animal control <strong>of</strong>ficers will take on duties <strong>of</strong> shelteremployees, including animal training and aggression testing. Councilwoman Anna Throne-Holst, who is running against Ms. Kabot for the supervisor seat this November, has objected t<strong>of</strong>olding animal control into the animal shelter because <strong>of</strong> the additional workload for the control <strong>of</strong>ficers. She did not return a call seeking comment this week. <strong>The</strong> town does not wantdangerous dogs to be adopted and that the town will seek to have the foundation continue current policies at the shelter.NORTH CAROLINAAberdeen – (10/22/09) - A fact-finding trip to a dog-training facility gave members <strong>of</strong> the Town Board a better idea <strong>of</strong> what K2 Solutions Inc. hopes to establish in Aberdeen. Though LaneKjellsen, founder and president <strong>of</strong> K2 Solutions, is asking for significantly more property in Aberdeen, he is currently training 130 dogs on five acres bordering a residential area. Zell alsoadded that the noise <strong>of</strong> dogs barking was no more <strong>of</strong> an issue at the facility than trains going through town or the sounds <strong>of</strong> detonations coming from Fort Bragg. <strong>The</strong> dogs respond to -commands to be quiet immediately. <strong>The</strong> facility has about 40 employees who specialize in different aspects <strong>of</strong> the training and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the dogs. Zell also commented on theobedience <strong>of</strong> the dogs and the training process that they go through for eight hours a day. Kjellsen told the Town Board at its Oct. 12 meeting that K2 Solutions pays $5,500 for each dog toenter the program. This cost excludes transportation <strong>of</strong> the dogs, veterinary services and the time spent training them. Overall, Zell and Liles thought the tour gave the board members a
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Monthly</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>http://mnlreport.typepad.com/<strong>Page</strong> 109 <strong>of</strong> <strong>330</strong>7/5/<strong>2010</strong>clearer picture <strong>of</strong> what activities would go on in Aberdeen if the board approves a change in the zoning ordinance to allow a dog-training facility in an area zoned for heavy industrial. Zell saidhe particularly likes that K2 Solutions is contracting directly with the military, and he sees the potential to bring more military contracts to the area with this operation. He said he also likes thatK2 Solutions is a local company wanting to expand in Moore County. Both Liles and Zell see the project as a potential contributor to tax revenues with more people coming to the area andliving in Aberdeen for the training. <strong>The</strong> main question the board has to consider is whether or not a kennel, itself, will be a good fit in the heavy industrial zone. <strong>The</strong> board is especiallyconcerned about what types <strong>of</strong> kennels the amendment would allow because parts <strong>of</strong> Aberdeen's downtown are zoned heavy industrial. "Is the next kennel going to be as good as the onethey run?" Zell said. "It has to work for the town. That's our concern." If the board approves an amendment to the zoning ordinance, it would be narrowly tailored to allow a facility like the oneK2 Solutions is proposing, but it would also protect the downtown. K2 solutions wants to act quickly on the property because it is under contract with the U.S. Marine Corps to train 112Labrador retrievers for special operations by December. <strong>The</strong> company lost a lot <strong>of</strong> time on the project in its failed negotiations with Moore County over potential property in Vass. At its nextmeeting, the board will discuss the wording <strong>of</strong> the proposed text amendment.Bladen County – (10/8/09) - Bladen amends animal control ordinance - What happened: <strong>The</strong> board unanimously approved a request to amend the Bladen County Animal ControlOrdinance by deleting the spay-and-neuter requirement. Because the spay-and-neuter paperwork has posed a problem for rescue groups moving animals out <strong>of</strong> state for adoption, WayneStewart said in a memorandum to County Manager Greg Martin, the amendment would allow these organizations to pull animals free <strong>of</strong> charge. Stewart is director <strong>of</strong> the Bladen CountyHealth Department. - Why it matters: Stewart told the board that based on discussions with the Animal Control staff, it appeared that the requirement posed a detriment to animal adoption.Stewart said he had gone before the Animal Control Advisory Board in August when it decided to raise its flat adoption fee from $15 to $25 for citizens. <strong>The</strong> cost to spay or neuter a dog,Stewart said, varies from $45 to $85 in the surrounding area. Rescue groups <strong>of</strong>ten receive a discount. - What they said: Commissioner Margaret Lewis Moore voiced concerns that somerescue groups appear to be charging for the animals pulled from the county's Animal Control shelter. "Why would we not charge for the animals?" she asked. "<strong>The</strong> animals that we pull arenot the ones people usually adopt," said Krista Hansen <strong>of</strong> A Shelter Friend <strong>of</strong> Bladen County. "Often, they have mange and heartworms. You don't make money with these animals. We're init for the lifesaving."Cumberland County – (10/2/09) - Cumberland County commissioners will be asked Monday to include criminal penalties in an animal control ordinance after a recent incident frustrated lawenforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials. As a result <strong>of</strong> the incident, acting County Attorney Harvey W. Raynor III said sheriff's deputies and animal control <strong>of</strong>ficers discovered they cannot seize dangerousanimals without an owner's permission. Including criminal penalties in the ordinance, which was endorsed by two commissioners Thursday, would enable investigators to obtain warrants tonot only search private property but seize animals threatening public safety, Raynor said. Currently, animal services <strong>of</strong>ficers may get administrative warrants. But they cannot take animalswith those warrants. UPDATE: (10/4/09) - Cumberland commissioners expected to act on new dog rule. Cumberland County Board <strong>of</strong> Commissioners - When and where: 9 a.m. Monday(10/5/09) in Room 118 <strong>of</strong> the Cumberland County Courthouse. What to expect: <strong>The</strong> commissioners will consider amending an animal ordinance to permit seizure <strong>of</strong> dangerous dogs withoutan owner's permission. Why it matters: A group <strong>of</strong> northern Cumberland County residents say they were threatened by a neighbor's dog, but county <strong>of</strong>ficials say they couldn't impound theanimal under current rules. UPDATE: (10/5/09) - Cumberland County Commissioners passed an amendment to an ordinance Monday in an effort to protect citizens from dangerous dogs.Commissioners voted unanimously to support a misdemeanor penalty if owners refuse to surrender a dangerous dog. According to the amendment, a dangerous dog is one that has killed orinjured a person without being provoked, a dog that has been determined to be potentially dangerous, or a dog that is owned primarily for fighting. "If you have a dangerous dog situation orpotentially dangerous dog situation or even a vicious dog situation, you want to be able to take that dog into custody as quickly as possible to provide the public with a more safeenvironment," said Interim County Attorney Harvey Raynor. "What we had was a situation where we saw that there was a hole in our ordinance and that by putting this misdemeanor penaltyin, that would correct that and allow us to take a dog when the home owner or the dogs owner was not willing to surrender it," said Raynor. Director <strong>of</strong> Animal Control Scottie Harris says theamendment will allow animal control <strong>of</strong>ficers to get dangerous dogs <strong>of</strong>f the streets faster, making Cumberland County a safer place to live."We're not forcing the issue or trying to chargepeople criminally. That's not our intent behind the ordinance. However, we needed a way to be able to go before the court system if an owner chose not to give us the right to the animal, thenwe still have a way to seize the animal," said Harris.Richmond County – (10/6/09) – Commissioner Dillman also questioned the possibility <strong>of</strong> revisiting the idea <strong>of</strong> a leash law in the county. “I keep getting calls from people who see dogswithout collars bothering children and adults,” Dillman said. Commissioner Thad Ussery said it’s too hard to enforce a leash law in the county because, “you have to have a little cooperationfrom the people, too.” <strong>The</strong> commissioners discussed that the county’s animal control <strong>of</strong>ficers will respond to calls <strong>of</strong> dogs running around without tags and collars and the county does have adangerous dog ordinance that says if anyone is bit by a dog, animal control will respond, and if the dog is deemed “dangerous” it will be put to sleep.Robinette added that it might be worth looking into specific dog bans like other county’s have for deer-hunting dogs and the like. “Developers need to have specific rules for their subdivisions,too,” Robinette said. <strong>The</strong>y all stressed that until there are more specific laws on the books, the best way to keep people and animals safe is to keep dogs on a leash, but to also make surethe animals have a name tag and their rabies tag on the collar because if a dog is picked up by animal control and there’s no pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a rabies vaccine, it could be put to sleep.OHIO(10/13/09) - As Nov. 3 approaches and the debate over Issue 2 escalates, Ohio's two largest humane societies and smaller ones, including Geauga Humane in rural Geauga County, todayannounced their opposition to the proposed constitutional amendment. <strong>The</strong>y join the Ohio Farmers Union, organic food proponents and environmental groups opposing the planto create a Livestock Care Standards Board that would determine how billions <strong>of</strong> cows, chickens, pigs, sheep and goats are treated here. <strong>The</strong> Cleveland Animal Protective League, GeaugaHumane and Capital Area Humane serving Greater Columbus say Issue 2 would not be good for farm animals, as the 13-member board appointed by the governor and legislators wouldinclude just one humane <strong>of</strong>ficer. "County humane societies had no voice in this proposal and no representation during discussions about the role and composition <strong>of</strong> the proposedboard," said Cleveland APL Director Sharon Harvey. "As county humane societies that are empowered to appoint humane agents who enforce Ohio's animal protection laws, including theprotection <strong>of</strong> farm animals, we should have had a voice in the role and composition <strong>of</strong> this board."Columbus – (10/6/09) - Pet enthusiasts pushing for the regulation <strong>of</strong> puppy mills took their fight to the Ohio Statehouse Tuesday. Lawmakers listened on as supporters argued for Senate Bill95, which would establish license requirements and set standards <strong>of</strong> care for dog breeding kennels. DiFrischia said a total <strong>of</strong> 32 states have passed or have pending puppy mill legislation.Proponents <strong>of</strong> the legislative action showed video <strong>of</strong> injured dogs confined in cages as evidence that the unregulated industry <strong>of</strong> pet breeding needs rules. But State Senator Bill Seitz (R-Cincinnati) is concerned that the legislation contains excessive restrictions and fees that penalize good breeders. “<strong>The</strong> general framework <strong>of</strong> the bill I agree with, but the reason these billshave always failed previously is that the proponents go too far in the other direction,“ Seitz said. <strong>The</strong> bill’s sponsor, State Senator Jim Hughes (R-Columbus) said action is needed and hewelcomed input that would lead to a bill that passes into law.Columbus – (10/14/09) - A group seeking to ban dog auctions in Ohio has the green light to begin collecting petition signatures toward a goal <strong>of</strong> putting the issue before voters next year. <strong>The</strong>Ohio Ballot Board yesterday certified that the proposed "Ohio Dog Auction Act" contains only one proposed law, clearing the way for the Coalition to Ban Ohio Dog Auctions to begincollecting the 120,683 valid signatures needed by the end <strong>of</strong> this year to have the legislature consider it. If the General Assembly fails to act within four months, the coalition then may collectan additional 120,683 signatures to get the issue on the November <strong>2010</strong> ballot. <strong>The</strong> proposed law would make it illegal for anyone to auction or raffle a dog in Ohio. It also would prohibitbringing dogs into the state for sale or trade that were acquired by auction or raffle elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> General Assembly has considered banning dog auctions as part <strong>of</strong> legislation to regulatecommercial dog breeders in Senate Bill 95 and House Bill 124. But O'Connor-Shaver said proponents <strong>of</strong> the legislation have watched it languish for four years and are "committed 110percent" to get the ban on dog auctions enacted themselves.Fremont – (10/16/09) - City hall was packed Thursday night to hear Fremont police Chief Tim Wiersma, Ohio Coalition <strong>of</strong> Dog Advocates' Jean Keating and Sandusky County's deputy dogwarden Gina Halbisen debate pit bulls. Councilman James Melle, who is chairman <strong>of</strong> the laws, rules and ordinance committee, said before the meeting that the purpose was to gatherinformation before considering any legislation. At another meeting at 6:30 p.m. Nov. 5, Ledy VanKavage, <strong>of</strong> the Best Friends Animal Society out <strong>of</strong> Illinois, will speak about pit bulls.Louis County – (10/23/09) - Two weeks after authorities seized 20 <strong>of</strong> her dogs, a Lewis County woman accused <strong>of</strong> running a filthy dog-breeding farm said she plans to reduce the number <strong>of</strong>dogs on her property to about 50 — a two-thirds reduction. Hahn, 26, and Lewis County authorities have given conflicting accounts <strong>of</strong> just about every detail since the Oct. 7 seizure. Officialsdescribed a house crammed with 100 dogs and floors and furniture blanketed with feces, while Hahn disputes both <strong>of</strong> those claims.Hanson said Hahn has made no effort to retrieve the 19remaining dogs from the shelter. Hahn said nobody at the shelter will return her phone calls and she wants to reclaim two <strong>of</strong> the dogs, which she said are older and are family pets. <strong>The</strong>recent seizure has brought attention to Lewis County’s breeder-friendly laws, which do not limit the number <strong>of</strong> dogs one person can possess.Those laws could change soon. A new state lawthat takes effect Jan. 1 will limit to 50 the number <strong>of</strong> dogs one person can have in their possession at any time. It also requires handlers to provide dogs with proper space, light and exercise.With this month’s seizure in mind, Lewis County commissioners are pushing for even stricter laws. <strong>The</strong>y want the 50-dog limit to apply to a property rather than an individual. Four people liveat Hahn’s five-acre parcel, meaning that even when the new state law takes effect, Hahn could actually add to her dog population. “That’s a huge loophole right there, because they couldhave 200,” Hanson said.<strong>The</strong> county plans to hold a public hearing to discuss the proposed ordinance, but no date has been set.St. Marys – (10/20/09) - City Councilors next week will get their first look at an ordinance regarding the trapping <strong>of</strong> cats — feral and domestic — one that also could lead toward a tag systemfor the felines. Members <strong>of</strong> the St. Marys Safety Committee, as well as approximately a dozen and a half citizens — attended the meeting to discuss the issue <strong>of</strong> trapping cats. <strong>The</strong> issuesurfaced last week during a city council meeting when a resident approached councilors regarding the trapping <strong>of</strong> domestic cats that were then transported and released in the country. CityLaw Director Kraig Noble provided committee members with a memo detailing possible options for councilors to consider. Noble said during his research on the topic, he found few lawsspecifically addressing the issue <strong>of</strong> cats. Freewalt said he plans to work with city <strong>of</strong>ficials, Zink and St. Marys Police Chief Greg Foxhoven to come up with a proposal that he feels will benefitall parties. Safety-Service Director Tom Hitchcock said the measure, in its first form, will be presented to councilors Monday. “We’ll do our best effort to put an ordinance together,” Hitchcocksaid. Freewalt said the ordinance would be read three times, allowing the opportunity for public input. <strong>The</strong> mayor also said the ordinance could change from its initial form when, and if,