<strong>The</strong> <strong>Monthly</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>http://mnlreport.typepad.com/<strong>Page</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>330</strong>7/5/<strong>2010</strong>_________________________________________________________________________________________CANADA(6/10/10) - <strong>The</strong> Calgary Humane Society says Alberta's animal abuse laws are outdated. <strong>The</strong> Calgary Humane Society is not too surprised by the results <strong>of</strong> a U-S based study that putAlberta near the bottom when it comes to punishing animal abusers. Spokesperson Desiree Arsenault says it is because our laws are outdated. <strong>The</strong> California based group, Animal LegalDefense Fund, says Alberta and Quebec are in the bottom tier when it comes to punishing animal abusers. Ontario finished in first place.Vancouver - Delta - While some governments around the world, including Ontario's, have banned pit bulls, Delta is taking a refreshingly different tack -- by putting more onus on theirowners to keep the controversial canines in line. After considerable community discussion, the feisty municipality is revamping its animal-control bylaw, which automatically designates pitbulls as "dangerous," to replace it with one that refuses to discriminate against them. Delta Coun. Robert Campbell said the draft bylaw should be passed by council this summer. It calls forescalating punishment for owners <strong>of</strong> dogs with a history <strong>of</strong> aggression, including fines <strong>of</strong> up to $1,000._________________________________________________________________________________________CHINABeijing – (6/7/10) - Police cannot stop cruelty to animals. Although animal lovers have urged the public to report cases <strong>of</strong> animal cruelty to the police, little is being done to tackle theproblem and even the police admit they are powerless to act on complaints without laws that make animal abuse a crime. About 300 artists, representatives from the media and animalprotection organizations gathered at a charity event in Beijing on Saturday to stress the importance <strong>of</strong> police enforcement. <strong>The</strong> China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA), theTravel Channel and local animal welfare groups jointly hosted the charity show on World Environment Day. Some frustrated animal lovers said they prefer to deal with the problemthemselves rather than call the police. Chen Nan, a volunteer with the Beijing-based Ruijia Animal Rescue Volunteer Group, told the Global Times Sunday that he heard rumors the police donot properly care for stray cats and dogs kept in animal rescue shelters. "<strong>The</strong>re are rumors saying the animals will be killed if no-one adopts them. That is why we have been avoiding askingthe police for help," he said. Chen said some policemen are not helpful. "<strong>The</strong>y are poorly equipped to catch the stray animals. <strong>The</strong>y don't even have cages, " he said. "Moreover, there is nolaw that allows them to arrest someone who abuses animals." Yu Lixian, director <strong>of</strong> the dog control department <strong>of</strong> Beijing public security bureau, admitted that in the absence <strong>of</strong> an animalcrueltylaw, police can only "educate" those who abuse animals. "Because there is no law that bans people from eating or abusing animals, we can only hope that people will change theirminds through education," Yu told the Global Times. Meanwhile, lawmakers are drafting the nation's first animal rights law, which would provide fines up to 6,000 yuan (878 U. S. dollars) andtwo weeks in detention for those found guilty <strong>of</strong> animal abuse._________________________________________________________________________________________DENMARK(7/1/10) - Denmark bans more dangerous dog breeds. Denmark has added 12 more dog breeds to a law banning dangerous dogs that already forbade people from owning pit bull terriersand tosa inus. Under the law that became effective on Thursday, the American Staffordshire terrier, Brazilian Fila, American bulldog and Dogo Argentino, among others, are forbidden.Owners who had such dogs before March 17 can keep them but the animals must be muzzled and restrained by a leash. No one will be allowed to enter the country with these breeds <strong>of</strong>dogs. Violators could have their animals seized and put to sleep. Denmark banned pit bull terriers and tosas in 1991 in line with several other European countries. Additional article – clickhere. - Danish dog breed law takes first innocent victim - a Boerboel. Denmark's most prestigious Boerboel breeding kennel, was forced to euthanize the first Boerboel victim <strong>of</strong>Denmark's cruel breed ban. <strong>The</strong> reason? Because she was a spayed female for which a home couldn't be found in time. One <strong>of</strong> the owners <strong>of</strong> Anasha Boerboels made the followingstatement: "<strong>The</strong> first Boerboel has to be put to sleep today because <strong>of</strong> the new dog laws that came into effect yesterday. In about an hour we will take her to the vets and she will beeuthanized. She is neutered and therefore cannot be used for breeding, therefore she would have to be placed as a pet. This is now illegal in Denmark and therefore she has to pay the price.We are a pr<strong>of</strong>essional kennel, we have vet inspections and the vet noted that she was here. We are not allowed to own pet dogs, only breeding dogs. This is a rule that the tax authoritieshave enforced so that kennels have to account for all the dog food etc used in their kennel business."_________________________________________________________________________________________INDIAAhmedabad – (7/3/10) – First ever dog census exercise in city planned. An international organisation, Humane Society International (HSI), will conduct the first ever dog census exercise inAhmedabad. This was decided in the meeting between Animal Welfare Board <strong>of</strong> India (AWBI) chairman major general RM Kharab (Retd.) and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) commissioner IP Gautamhere on Saturday. Also, AWBI and AMC signed a MOU for effective Animal Birth Control (ABC) programme and sharing <strong>of</strong> grant equally through Society for Stray Canine Birth Control (SSCBC).On the census exercise, Gautam said, "<strong>The</strong> HSI <strong>of</strong>ficials will visit the city on July 9 to discuss the modalities for census exercise. <strong>The</strong> organisation will do the census free <strong>of</strong> cost. After the census a massivesterilisation drive will be conducted in the city."On the use <strong>of</strong> barbaric iron tongs by Cattle Nuisance Control Department (CNCD) <strong>of</strong> AMC, Kharab said, "Catching the dogs with orthodox manner is not advisable as it amounts to animal cruelty." "<strong>The</strong> AWBIexperts will train the AMC staff to catch the dogs in a humane way at Marwar Trust in Jodhpur." Both the organisation will work in a time bound manner to control the dog population in Ahmedabad.Kharab also met senior state government <strong>of</strong>ficials for implementation <strong>of</strong> ABC programme in other civic bodies across the state. AWBI <strong>of</strong>ficials have visited different Non Government Organisation(NGOs) in thecity to check infrastructure facilities, Kharab said, "<strong>The</strong> infrastructure facilities need to be upgraded for ABC programme and AWBI certificate is essential for NGOs to carry out the programme."AMC authorities blamed the Animal Help Foundation (AHF) for a botched' up sterilisation programme in the city. Gautam said, "In year, 2006, AHF did a good job but after that they were not up to the expectation.In past four years they have sterilised just 20,000 dogs which is far below the standards."FIAPO Trustee, Abodh Aras, who was present during the discussion, said, "Birth control by sterilization - removal <strong>of</strong> ovaries and castration is advocated in conjunction with rabies inoculation for dogs."Chandigarh – (6/7/10) – Chandigarh gets dog bye laws. Residents <strong>of</strong> Chandigarh now have to register their dogs with the municipal corporation and will be allowed to keep a maximum <strong>of</strong>two, the union territory administration said Monday. <strong>The</strong> administration issued the Chandigarh Registration <strong>of</strong> Bye Laws, <strong>2010</strong>, according to which all dogs over 4 months have to beregistered.New Delhi – (6/23/10) - Govt revises draft Pet shop rules <strong>2010</strong>. Following suggestions from animal rights activists, the government has revised the draft pet shop rules <strong>2010</strong>, makingprovisions for a defaulter to appeal against show-cause notice apart from addressing other issues. <strong>The</strong> draft rules, formulated by the ministry last month, were meant to prevent cruelty toanimals in pet shops by ensuring they are supplied adequate food and drinking water, not sold at a tender age besides taking steps to prevent their unnatural deaths and spread <strong>of</strong> infectiousdiseases.However, following objections from various quarters including animal rights activists and lawyers opposing the draft rules, the government set up a panel to consider their views. Acting ontheir suggestions, the ministry has revised "provision for issuance <strong>of</strong> show-cause notices prior to embarking upon prejudicial action, for recording <strong>of</strong> reasons in writing and for appeals andpersonal hearings_________________________________________________________________________________________SCOTLAND(7/1/10) - Animal welfare Bill welcome but lacks important detail. Ulster Unionist agriculture spokesperson Tom Elliott MLA has said that the Welfare <strong>of</strong> Animals Bill, while ultimatelywelcome in its ability to "protect animals from abandonment, from suffering and from being used by criminals in fights and baiting", is unfortunately "almost void <strong>of</strong> any detail" in its currentform. Criticising the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture for bringing forward a Bill without detail, the "gaps" <strong>of</strong> which would be filled in by subordinate legislation, the UUP MLA - deputy chair <strong>of</strong> theAssembly Agriculture Committee, said: "We don't believe in giving the Department powers without knowing what the detail is and we're not going to start now. "It's also empty because itavoids tackling issues that are relevant to the welfare <strong>of</strong> animals, such as the use <strong>of</strong> wild animals in circuses, keeping primates as pets and the regulation <strong>of</strong> breeding establishments. "It's asif the Minister and the Department, in their quest to earn Brownie points by passing another Bill, want to avoid controversial issues." Pointing to the Department's desire to create an <strong>of</strong>fencein respect <strong>of</strong> tail docking, the Fermanagh and South Tyrone MLA asked for an explanation why they would seek to argue that a lamb's tail or a pig's tail can be docked when they seek toprohibit the tail docking <strong>of</strong> a working dog. "<strong>The</strong>y should explain how the pain associated with the castration <strong>of</strong> an animal is any different or less severe than the docking <strong>of</strong> a dog's tail."Welcoming the introduction <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences relating to the practice <strong>of</strong> animal fighting, Mr Elliott said that the legislation must be sufficiently "stringent to guarantee that criminals areappropriately punished and that they <strong>of</strong>fer an appropriate deterrent to those who participate in this heinous crime"._________________________________________________________________________________________TURKEY6/30/10 - Turkey Aims to Seize Every Pit Bull in the Country. Last week, the Turkish parliament decided it was time to start rounding up "pit bull type" dogs - specifically, pit bull terriers,Japanese Tosas, Dogo Argentinos, and Fila Brasileiros — and, on June 27th, the witch hunt began. Memos were sent around to every governor's <strong>of</strong>fice in the country, ordering them to startenforcing a 2004 law that said it's illegal to own, breed, sell, import, gift, exchange or advertise these dogs. <strong>The</strong> plan, effective immediately, is seize "pit bulls" from their homes and impoundthem in shelters. Some <strong>of</strong>ficials claim they will be spaying and neutering them, but considering it is illegal to own, sell, advertise or exchange these dogs, it's a pretty safe bet that the dogswon't be headed back home or be put up for adoption. And, there aren't any shelters in Turkey looking to take in the estimated 10,000 "pit bulls" in the country. It's a death sentence for thedogs. UPDATE: Dog experts bite back at Turkey's pit bull ban. <strong>The</strong> government’s issuing <strong>of</strong> orders to round up pit bulls and other “dangerous” breeds was an unfortunate, unscientificdecision, experts have said, calling for assessments <strong>of</strong> individual dogs rather than a total ban. “Dogs <strong>of</strong> all breeds rather than just a specific few must take temperament tests, and thosecategorized as dangerous must be forbidden and taken under supervision,” said Tamer Dodurka, a pr<strong>of</strong>essor at Istanbul University’s Veterinary Faculty, daily Milliyet reported Tuesday.Taking calm dogs that have never caused harm to anyone from their owners just because they are pit bulls is illogical.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Monthly</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>http://mnlreport.typepad.com/<strong>Page</strong> 13 <strong>of</strong> <strong>330</strong>7/5/<strong>2010</strong>_________________________________________________________________________________________UK(6/30/10) - CWU response to DEFRA Public consultation On Dangerous Dogs. (read full article at the link) Communication Workers Union (CWU) response to HM Government’s(DEFRA) Public consultation On Dangerous Dogs – June <strong>2010</strong> (CWU ‘Bite-Back’ Campaign):As you will know from LTB 206/10, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) released a public consultation on 9 March <strong>2010</strong> to establish if the current dangerous doglegislation adequately protects the public, to consider proposals for changes to dog control legislation and how to encourage responsible dog ownership. Since then there has been a change<strong>of</strong> government and the Health, Safety and Environment Department is continuing efforts via a number <strong>of</strong> channels to ensure the present government carries forward plans to significanmtlyamend the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and other associatyed legislation.100,000 CWU members – including 70,000 Royal Mail and Parcelforce Worldwide delivery workers and 30,000 BT Engineers are vulnerable and are exposed to the risk <strong>of</strong> Dog Attacks on adaily basis. Whilst at work 5000 – 6000 Postal workers and 300 – 400 BT workers are attacked by dogs every year.<strong>The</strong> Law on dangerous Dogs as it currently stands and its enforcement by the Police, Dog Wardens and the Courts has proved to be totally ineffective in protecting CWU members as dogattack numbers have risen and injuries have worsened. Two Postmen (in Sheffield at Christmas 2007 and in Cambridge at Christmas 2008) were nearly killed in dog attacks and thousands<strong>of</strong> others have suffered horrific physical and psychological injuries. <strong>The</strong> CWU welcomes the Government’s proposals to tackle the issue <strong>of</strong> Dangerous Dogs by changing the Dangerous DogsLaw in England and Wales and so follow the Law changes being introduced in Scotland and Northern Ireland. It has been apparent for many years that the existing Dangerous Dogs Act1991 doesn’t work effectively in controlling dangerous dogs and dealing with irresponsible owners and leaves many victims with no remedy in criminal law. <strong>The</strong> law urgently needs revising tohelp protect the general public, workers and children as well as dog welfare. <strong>The</strong> CWU has been lobbying the UK Governments <strong>of</strong> England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland for thesechanges through our “Bite-Back” Campaign, launched after the Sheffield attack. <strong>The</strong> CWU welcomed the Defra proposal to run a Public Consultation as the first stage <strong>of</strong> the process andwelcomes the opportunity to provide a response to the public consultation on dangerous dogs. <strong>The</strong> CWU believes that changes to the current legislation are necessary and long overdue. <strong>The</strong>changes should enable all enforcement agencies to target the worst <strong>of</strong>fenders and the most aggressive dogs. It is important to bear in mind that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> dog owners are lawabiding and they should not be affected by a tightening <strong>of</strong> the Law. (go to link for balance <strong>of</strong> article)(6/19/10) - <strong>The</strong> woman called in to vet dog breeders. Two years ago an undercover BBC documentary caused an outcry by revealing that the Kennel Club, organiser <strong>of</strong> the world's largestdog show, Crufts, was encouraging the breeding <strong>of</strong> deformed animals. "Pedigree Dogs Exposed", two years in the making, showed how the governing body laid down standards that requiredunhealthy features such as short faces, wrinkling, screw-tails and dwarfism. <strong>The</strong> resulting scandal prompted the BBC to abandon its 42-year coverage <strong>of</strong> Crufts, three separate inquiries and,yesterday, the appointment <strong>of</strong> a woman charged with cleaning up the mess left by Britain's newly troubled relationship with dogs. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Sheila Crispin, 66, an experienced veterinarysurgeon, will come forward with practical measures to end genetic flaws and two other problems, dangerous dogs and cruel puppy farms. She will chair the new Advisory Council on WelfareIssues on Dog Breeding, an independent non-statutory body which will come into force later this year. Overseen by a part-time council, it will dispense advice on all matters relating to caninereproduction: breeding strategies, research, legislation and public education. After the Dogs Trust announced her appointment yesterday, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Crispin said action was already underwayelsewhere to tackle breed standards and dangerous dogs. After initially providing an equivocal response to the BBC show, the Kennel Club has come forward with new guidelines for 78 <strong>of</strong>209 pedigree breeds, including 22 acknowledged to suffer from abnormalities. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Crispin, a past president <strong>of</strong> the Royal College <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Surgeons, hopes her organisation willend some <strong>of</strong> the worst excesses through education: advising existing and potential dog owners about where and how to buy a puppy. She said: "Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Bateson said what we need is aJoanna Lumley. We need someone who is more glamorous and handsome than me and who the public can relate to." Her first job, however, will be to recruit fellow members <strong>of</strong> the council,who will work for a nominal fee and expenses. She is looking for eight part-time members, including someone with knowledge <strong>of</strong> the law relating to dogs; a vet in a small practice; experts ingenetics and canine reproduction; an epidemiologist; and two lay members <strong>of</strong> the public. In time, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Crispin hopes the council – which she hopes will be funded by animal welfareorganisations – will become complementary to the Government's Farm Animal Welfare Council, which sets guidelines for the care <strong>of</strong> the UK's 900 million or so chickens, turkeys, sheep, pigsand cattle. Appointed by a panel including Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Bateson, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Crispin has an impressive pedigree. She is an honorary member <strong>of</strong> the Kennel Club, a life member <strong>of</strong> theInternational Sheep Dog Society, and a visiting pr<strong>of</strong>essorial fellow in the department <strong>of</strong> anatomy at Bristol University. She has two dogs herself.(7/2/10) - Warning on tail docking as Animal Health steps up inspections. FARMERS have been warned they could face prosecution, or have part <strong>of</strong> their Single Farm Payment (SFP)withheld, if they flout the law on tail docking at shows and events this summer. <strong>The</strong> warning comes after an inspection by Animal Health vets at the Royal Highland Show stirred controversyas vets threatened to stop a number <strong>of</strong> sheep competing in the show after they were found to have ‘excessively short tails’. Similar inspections took place last month at the Three CountiesShow and more are expected at other events throughout the summer. Animal Health said there growing concerns over the short-docking <strong>of</strong> pedigree lambs becoming fashionable amongexhibitors and warned there would be tough measures to stop farmers flouting the rules. Paul Honeyman, Animal Health’s veterinary services manager for welfare said: “We take this issueextremely seriously and we will be taking similar action at shows across the country this summer. “It seems to be fashionable among some sheep owners to short-dock lambs – particularlypedigree lambs. This is illegal, and sheep keepers in England, Scotland and Wales can be prosecuted if they are found to have short-docked their animals.Burnley – (7/1/10) - Burnley Council asks public's views on new dog laws. BURNLEY Council has begun a month-long public consultation on the introduction <strong>of</strong> Dog Control Orderswhich will replace existing controls. <strong>The</strong> consultation is taking place through the council's website, www.burnley.gov.uk, where details <strong>of</strong> the proposed orders, frequently asked questions anda questionnaire may be found. <strong>The</strong> public can also visit the Contact Centre, in Parker Lane, to complete paper copies <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire. <strong>The</strong> council will also write to organisations,including the friends <strong>of</strong> parks groups and sports groups to seek their views.London – (7/1/10) - Battersea Dogs Home calls for action on bull terrier breeders. Battersea Dogs Home today called on the Government to make dog owners “more accountable” asthe number <strong>of</strong> Staffordshire bull terriers coming into the rescue centre hit an all-time high. Laura Jenkins, director <strong>of</strong> animal welfare at the home, said the responsibility lies with theGovernment. She said: “Until owners are made more accountable and dogs can be traced back to their owners then the situation isn't going to change but we hope the recent Department forEnvironment, Food and Rural Affairs consultation into dog legislation is a move in the right direction.” Research by the Kennel Club showed that the Staffordshire bull terrier has ousted thelabrador as the capital's most popular dog. Almost three times as many Londoners buy the breed than anywhere else in Britain.
- Page 2: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 6 and 7: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 8 and 9: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 10 and 11: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 14 and 15: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 16 and 17: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 18 and 19: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 20 and 21: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 22 and 23: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 24 and 25: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 26 and 27: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 28 and 29: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 30 and 31: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 32 and 33: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 34 and 35: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 36 and 37: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 38 and 39: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 40 and 41: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 42 and 43: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 44 and 45: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 46 and 47: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 48 and 49: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 50: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 53 and 54: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 55 and 56: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 57 and 58: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 59 and 60: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 61 and 62: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 63 and 64:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 65 and 66:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 67 and 68:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 69 and 70:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 71 and 72:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 73 and 74:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 75 and 76:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 77 and 78:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 79 and 80:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 81 and 82:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 83 and 84:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 85 and 86:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 87 and 88:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 89 and 90:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 91 and 92:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 93 and 94:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 95 and 96:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 97 and 98:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 99 and 100:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 101 and 102:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 103 and 104:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 105 and 106:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 107 and 108:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 109 and 110:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 111 and 112:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 113 and 114:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 115 and 116:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 117 and 118:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 119 and 120:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 121 and 122:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 123 and 124:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 125 and 126:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 127 and 128:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 129 and 130:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 131 and 132:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 133 and 134:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 135 and 136:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 137 and 138:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 139 and 140:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 141 and 142:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 143 and 144:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 145 and 146:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 147 and 148:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 149 and 150:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 151 and 152:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 153 and 154:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 155 and 156:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 157 and 158:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 159 and 160:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 161 and 162:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 163 and 164:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 165 and 166:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 167 and 168:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 169 and 170:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 171:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 174 and 175:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 176 and 177:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 178 and 179:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 180 and 181:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 182 and 183:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 184 and 185:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 186 and 187:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 188 and 189:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 190 and 191:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 192 and 193:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 194 and 195:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 196 and 197:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 198 and 199:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 200 and 201:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 202 and 203:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 204 and 205:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 206 and 207:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 208 and 209:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 210 and 211:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 212 and 213:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 214 and 215:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 216 and 217:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 218 and 219:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 220 and 221:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 222 and 223:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 224 and 225:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 226 and 227:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 228 and 229:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 230 and 231:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 232 and 233:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 234 and 235:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 236 and 237:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 238 and 239:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 240 and 241:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 242 and 243:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 244 and 245:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 246 and 247:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 248 and 249:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 250 and 251:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 252 and 253:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 254 and 255:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 256 and 257:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 258 and 259:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 260 and 261:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 262 and 263:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 264 and 265:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 266 and 267:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 268 and 269:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 270 and 271:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 272 and 273:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 274 and 275:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 276 and 277:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 278 and 279:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 280 and 281:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 282 and 283:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 284 and 285:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 286 and 287:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 288 and 289:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 290 and 291:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 292 and 293:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 294 and 295:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 296 and 297:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 298 and 299:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 300 and 301:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 302 and 303:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 304 and 305:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 306 and 307:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 308 and 309:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 310 and 311:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 312 and 313:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 314 and 315:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 316 and 317:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 318 and 319:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 320 and 321:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 322 and 323:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 324 and 325:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 326 and 327:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 328 and 329:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 330:
The Monthly National Legislation Re