<strong>The</strong> <strong>Monthly</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>http://mnlreport.typepad.com/<strong>Page</strong> 306 <strong>of</strong> <strong>330</strong>7/5/<strong>2010</strong>that it doesn't affect responsible pet owners who keep their pets in their own yard or home. Council president Mick Fowler said council primarily is trying to address the problem <strong>of</strong> stray catsin town. Council has discussed limiting the number <strong>of</strong> pets homeowners can have to six. Council will meet at 5:30 p.m. Monday at the city building, 127 N. Foote Street.Muncie - (11/12/08) - For months, the advisory group to the Muncie Animal Shelter known as the Animal Care Commission has wondered about talks <strong>of</strong> merging city and county animalcontrol. Comprised <strong>of</strong> four veterinarians and one former city council member, the commission, created by municipal ordinance in 2005, this week learned its likely fate and was asked toendorse that fate: elimination. In the dark until now, members were updated by the deputy mayor, the president <strong>of</strong> the county commissioners and the woman who will preside over theprivate organization meant to take over animal control countywide. Kathie Onieal, local pet business owner and investment counselor, presides over a new Humane Society -- yet anothercounty animal rescue nonpr<strong>of</strong>it, but one seen by both city and county <strong>of</strong>ficials as key to a long-standing problem: the city's costly ($450,000 per year) service and the county's marginalanimal-care efforts.Terre Haute - (10/16/08) - Local current events came into play as one audience member asked the candidates if they would support legislation to regulate breeding facilities, includinginspections. As an emotional issue, Cummins said it can be difficult to deal with. He said he would support legislation as long as business owners’ property rights were respected becauseagriculture and animal husbandry is big business in Indiana. People who were at the scene in Sullivan County last week called Tincher explaining the horrible conditions the animals were in,he said. As a result, he said he’s gathering information and looking to draft a bill that will regulate puppy mills to have sanitary and humane conditions.Union City - (11/12/08) - Union City, Ind. council members discussed aspects <strong>of</strong> the proposed pet ordinance and made suggestions for revisions. <strong>The</strong> ordinance is scheduled for firstreading at the next council meeting. <strong>The</strong> next regularly-scheduled Union City, Ind. council meeting is set for 6 p.m., Monday, November 24. However, a special council meeting hasbeen called for 5 p.m., Friday, November 14.IOWAClarinda - (10/17/08) -On Thursday night, Oct. 9, the City Council approved the first reading <strong>of</strong> an ordinance making pet owners responsible for the sanitation <strong>of</strong> their animals. <strong>The</strong>ordinance considered by the City Council relating to the sanitation <strong>of</strong> animals is intended to ensure pet owners clean-up after their pets. Clarinda Police Chief Keith Brothers said violation <strong>of</strong>the ordinance would be a simple misdemeanor, which carries a maximum fine <strong>of</strong> $500 or 30 days in jail.Clear Lake - (10/21/08) - <strong>The</strong> Clear Lake City Council is considering a crackdown on dangerous animals. On Monday the council approved the first reading <strong>of</strong> an ordinance that wouldcreate a new chapter in the city's municipal code specifically dealing with dangerous animals. Previously it was part <strong>of</strong> the city's animal protection and control ordinance. Under the proposal,an animal would be deemed vicious if it attacks, bites or claws any person without provocation while at large or while unable to be controlled or restrained by its owner. City AdministratorScott Flory says putting the rules into an ordinance gives police guidelines on how to deal with dangerous animals and the authority to take action when necessary. <strong>The</strong> ordinance is pendingfinal council approval.LeMars - (11/5/08) - <strong>The</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> licenses for Le Mars dogs and cats moved a step closer Tuesday as members <strong>of</strong> the Le Mars City Council, voted 4-1, to give first reading approval for apet licensing ordinance. <strong>The</strong> new ordinance as written will require the annual licensing <strong>of</strong> all dogs and cats age 6 months or more by a local veterinarian with pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> currentvaccinations required. Fees will be set annually as part <strong>of</strong> the council's fee resolution action each January. From each licensing fee $1 will be given to the licensing veterinarian. <strong>The</strong> newlicensing ordinance must come before the council for its second and third readings before approval. If it is passed on its third reading, the licensing ordinance will become effective Jan.1, 2009.KANSASKansas City - (10/17/08) -Upset dog owners in Kansas City, Kan., confronted the city on Monday about a dog ordinance they think is unfair. <strong>The</strong>y said the current ordinance focuses toomuch on the breed <strong>of</strong> the dog and not on the behavior. <strong>The</strong> pet owners said dogs are being confiscated because they look like pit bulls. One woman said she had DNA tests to prove her dogwas not a pit bull, and she still couldn't have the dog living in the city. City Council members said they plan to take the dog owners' concerns into consideration, and will look at other cityordinances before making a final decision on whether to make changes.Wichita - (11/14/08) - <strong>The</strong> city formed a committee to study the issue after a story in March expressed concern from some dog owners that yearly rabies vaccinations may be unnecessaryand even harmful to pets. <strong>The</strong> committee, made up <strong>of</strong> veterinarians, animal care experts and public health <strong>of</strong>ficials, met in July to discuss whether the ordinance should be changed. <strong>The</strong> city,working with Wichita State University and the Wichita Veterinary Medical Association, prepared a two-page survey to find out how the majority <strong>of</strong> area veterinarians stand on the issue. Afterreviewing the survey results, environmental services will prepare a recommendation that it will present to the City Council in December, Johnson said. Any proposed revisions will bepresented before District Advisory Boards so people can comment on them before a council vote, Johnson said.KENTUCKYLouisville - (11/14/08) - URGENT NOTICE: For those living in Louisville, KY: Metro Animal Services now has in place a Task Force which is operating under color <strong>of</strong>law, illegally seizinganimals. A member <strong>of</strong> the Task Force contacts people who have advertised puppies or kittens in the Courier-Journal, on www.Louisville-pets.com,LouisvilleMojo.com, or craigslist.com (and possibly other sites). This member, a Louisville Metro Animal Control Officer, poses as a puppy buyer, and when grantedaccess to the property in that guise, does an inspection. <strong>The</strong>n, immediately upon leaving the property, the ACO signals to the other members <strong>of</strong> the Task Force(which inexplicably include Louisville Metro Police Officers), who then arrive on the doorstep demanding entry andthreatening to seize the animals. Up to this point, ACOs have been granted access and animals have been seized. Those animals are not returned to the ownerwithout extortionate fines (well over $300 per animal), and penalties including spaying/neutering <strong>of</strong> the parents and vaccinations <strong>of</strong> the puppies regardless <strong>of</strong> age. IFYOU FIND YOURSELF IN THIS SITUATION: Do not panic! REFUSE ENTRY to policeand ACOs alike UNTIL A SEARCH WARRANT IS PRODUCED, describing your property and the probable cause upon which the warrant is based, and signed by a judge.CONTACT AN ATTORNEY! (report provided by rpoa@texas.net )Providence - Webster County - (11/15/08) - Webster County <strong>of</strong>ficials are working on an updated dog ordinance, hoping to protect the public from so-called "vicious breeds." Specifically,they're proposing stricter regulations for pit bull owners. Under the proposed ordinance, owners <strong>of</strong> pit bulls or other dogs considered vicious would need an extra high insurance policy <strong>of</strong> atleast $100,000 to cover potential damages. None <strong>of</strong> the county <strong>of</strong>ficials involved in the ordinance were available for interview but they did say the regulation is meant to keep dog ownersmore responsible. <strong>The</strong> second and final reading <strong>of</strong> the ordinance is scheduled for November 24th.LOUISIANASpringhill - (10/22/08) -A warning has gone out to dog owners in the north Louisiana city <strong>of</strong> Springhill. Last week, some Springhill residents were notified by letter form the localpostmaster that dangerous dogs were creating a problem for mail carriers, and that the problem could lead to interruption <strong>of</strong> mail service. Mayor Carroll Breaux says three dogs have beentaken <strong>of</strong>f the streets. And Breaux is warning residents that the city will enforce its law against dogs running loose.Welsh - Board <strong>of</strong> Aldermen here may amend the existing pit bull ban to include all similar, "vicious" dogs, considering a possible Doberman Pinscher ban.MAINEAugusta - (10/14/08) -Breeders and dog aficionados across the state are saying their voices are not being heard by state Animal Welfare Division Director Norma Worley, whom theydescribe as being too aggressive and failing to work with local dog rescue groups and private shelters. <strong>The</strong>y point to a budget overdrawn by $660,000 as pro<strong>of</strong> that she is too heavy-handed,seizing hundreds <strong>of</strong> animals that need to be medically treated and supported by taxpayers, rather than working with the affected kennels. Worley's solution to the financial crisis in herdepartment is to raise dramatically the cost <strong>of</strong> dog licenses, kennel permit fees and breeding licenses. She said she is submitting legislation this winter that would raise the fees for licenses andpermits to help repay operating funds that her division has borrowed from the state Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture pesticides division. It must be paid back by next summer. Her proposalincludes raising pet licenses from $11 to $20 for fertile dogs, and from $6 to $10 for spayed and neutered dogs. Although she also has proposed doubling the fee for boarding kennel licenses
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Monthly</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>http://mnlreport.typepad.com/<strong>Page</strong> 307 <strong>of</strong> <strong>330</strong>7/5/<strong>2010</strong>from $75 to $150, she called that “a place holder.” <strong>The</strong> draft bill also redefines pet shops and doubles their license fees and grants sweeping powers <strong>of</strong> seizure to animal welfare agents,including not requiring them to get warrants before entering private property to take animals.South Portland - (11/12/08) - Using no-nonsense terms, South Portland city councilors discussed tougher laws for dogs on Willard Beach, including increasing beach patrols, issuing finesand banning unruly dogs from the city's popular beach.MARYLANDSalisbury - Dog owners who fear Fido might bite or that he might bark incessantly should take notice <strong>of</strong> a law designed to curtail his deviant behavior. Wicomico County Council will hold apublic hearing Wednesday on a "dangerous dogs" proposal. <strong>The</strong> law would set up an Animal Appeal Board that can rule on euthanizing a dog after just one violent attack and impound abarking dog if it is deemed a severe "public nuisance." Dogs must have clean drinking water, shelter from inclement weather and proper veterinary care, the law states. Owners can't leave adog unattended in an automobile without ventilation on a hot, summer day. Owners must provide their dog with uncramped living quarters and keep the area free <strong>of</strong> a buildup <strong>of</strong> feces. <strong>The</strong>law also states that no chains or ropes can be used as collars.MASSACHUSETTSHB5092 - Resolve, Directing the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources To Review and Make Recommendations Regarding the Regulation<strong>of</strong> Dog and Cat Breeding Facilities http://www.mass.gov/legis/185history/h05092.htm Today (10-23-08) the Massachusetts Legislature’s Joint Committee onMunicipalities and Regional Government decided to send House Bill 5092 to “study,” which effectively ends the consideration <strong>of</strong> this onerous bill for theremainder <strong>of</strong> the current legislative session.Brockton - (10/14/08) - Bridgewater is not alone. Across the region, in Brockton, Middleboro, Raynham and elsewhere, communities are losing thousands <strong>of</strong> dollars in uncollected doglicense fees and late fines — at a time when they face a budget crunch that is getting worse as the Wall Street mess trickles down to Main Street. Communities need every dollar they can get,but lenient policies or inadequate manpower to enforce them make it mighty difficult to go after dog-license sc<strong>of</strong>flaws, <strong>of</strong>ficials say. “<strong>The</strong>re’s no teeth to the law,” Middleboro Town ClerkEileen Gates said about her town’s dog-license policy.Essex - (11/5/08) - Residents in Essex decided to adopt new dog control laws during Monday night's special Town Meeting. Article 11, which proposed placing more controls on dogsroaming at large, eventually passed, but not before discussion and some amending.Haverhill - (11/3/08) - <strong>The</strong> public will have its chance to weigh in Thursday on a proposal by the mayor to open up a city-owned trail along Plug Pond and through the woods for dogowners to walk their pets unrestrained by a leash. What: City Council hearing on the mayor's proposed dog trail When: Thursday, 7 p.m. 11/6/08 Where: Room 204, City Hall What's afterhearing: Council will vote on the plan after getting public inputSalisbury - (10/22/08) - A pit bull owner must go before selectmen after Animal Control Officer Harold Congdon brought complaints to the board, and the town may consider overhaulingits dog ordinance entirely after two other reports <strong>of</strong> pit bull problems in town.MICHIGANNo report for MichiganMINNESOTANorthfield - (10/21/08) - <strong>The</strong>re’s no Northfield ordinance or statue for dangerous or potentially dangerous animals.” <strong>The</strong> city doesn’t have a way to identify dangerous animals or a methodfor pet owners to challenge such a ruling. Northfield's ordinances regarding dangerous dogs are fairly lax compared to those <strong>of</strong> other Minnesota cities. Faribault, Shakopee, Brooklyn Parkand Minnetonka all have pages-long ordinances guiding how dangerous dogs are dealt with. In Brooklyn Park, dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs must be registered annually andphotographed. Anyone who keeps a dangerous dog in the Hennepin County city must keep it securely confined and restrained and have it implanted with a microchip to help identify it.Brooklyn Park also allows for forced sterilization <strong>of</strong> dangerous dogs, their removal and destruction. Faribault ordinances provide for dealing with vicious dogs, which they define as an “animalthat has inflicted multiple bites on a person or which has bitten more than one person at least once.” Vicious animals are illegal in Faribault and by law, must be impounded. Morisette, thecity’s prosecutor, said it shouldn’t take long before the city’s ordinance is revised. He believes he can cobble together a city council resolution giving the police chief authority to designatedangerous and potentially dangerous animals. If all goes well, said Morisette, the council could approve a resolution by year’s end.MISSISSIPPIColumbus - (10/22/08) - Columbus pet owners will not be required to register their dogs and pay a registration fee, but pets who roam outdoors must wear identification tags, according toa new animal control ordinance passed Tuesday by the Columbus City Council. Additionally, while the ordinance prohibits the tethering <strong>of</strong> dogs to inanimate objects, the ordinance does allowfor a dog to be “temporarily” tethered, if the owner is “within 20-feet <strong>of</strong> the animal.” <strong>The</strong> new ordinance also requires pets to wear tags from a veterinarian specifying they have beenvaccinated, especially against rabies. <strong>The</strong> council issued initial approval <strong>of</strong> the ordinance Tuesday (10/21/08) night; the council will be asked to approve the ordinance for adoption in 30 daysor more. <strong>The</strong> ordinance can be found on the city’s Web site here.Jackson - (11/5/08) - <strong>The</strong> Jackson City Council is scheduled to vote on a proposed dog ordinance Tuesday (11/11/08). <strong>The</strong>y are scheduled to meet at City Hall at 10 a.m. <strong>The</strong> ordinancewould ban pit bulls and other dogs considered dangerous from living in the city limits. <strong>The</strong> council is also considering limiting the number <strong>of</strong> dogs per household. UPDATE: (11/14/08) - <strong>The</strong>Jackson, Mississippi city council will be discussing at its next regular council meeting on Tuesday, November 18, 2008, a dangerous and potentially dangerous dog ordinance that would banspecific breeds from the city <strong>of</strong> Jackson. <strong>The</strong> ordinance was proposed by City Councilman Jeff Weill, and would ban “pit bulls” and “several related dogs.” For city council contactinformation, click HERE.MISSOURIColumbia - (11/14/08) - An ordinance that could raise fees for people whose unspayed or unneutered animals are impounded by Animal Control was discussed Thursday night at theColumbia/Boone County Board <strong>of</strong> Health meeting.<strong>The</strong> proposed ordinance would implement an impoundment fee <strong>of</strong> $150 for each animal that is not spayed or neutered. Also discussed at themeeting was the possibility <strong>of</strong> renewing the city's contract with the Humane Society. If the contract is not renewed in 2009, other ordinances will need to be updated, too. <strong>The</strong> board alsodiscussed the role <strong>of</strong> the city and county in animal welfare services. Health department staff will discuss and modify the proposed ordinances at the next Board <strong>of</strong> Health meeting, whichwill be Dec. 11.Joplin - City Council members on Monday (10/27/08) will look at health-board recommendations that would change Joplin’s animal ordinances to try to reduce the risks <strong>of</strong> dog bites. <strong>The</strong>Joplin Health Department’s advisory board was asked several months ago by the council to study ordinances that would make the city safer and to report back to the council, said DanPekarek, health director. <strong>The</strong> health board’s efforts included examining breed-specific legislation that bans breeds such as pit bulls and Rottweilers.Park Hills - (11/16/08) -Park Hills City Council <strong>of</strong>ficially banned housing <strong>of</strong> mountain lions within city limits Thursday night. <strong>The</strong> same goes for lions, tigers, bears and 17 other wild animals.<strong>The</strong> amended animal regulations ordinance also prevents city residents from having a leopard, ocelot, jaguar, jaguarondi, cheetah, margay, Canada lynx, bobcat, panther, hyena, wolf, coyote,fox, wild cat, wolf hybrid, nonhuman primate, or any deadly dangerous or poisonous reptile. Boa constrictors and pythons less than eight feet long are exempt from the new provision, as areevents where a special permit has been issued by the city for entertainment purposes. <strong>The</strong> amendment passed 6-0, with Ward I Councilman Mike Glore and Ward IV Councilman TerryBarnett absent.Pilot Grove - (11/10/08) - A violent dog ordinance is now in effect in Pilot Grove, Missouri after the council's unanimous approval at last Wednesday's meeting (11/05/08). Under the newordinance, there are options for what could happen to an animal that bites or injures a person, including impoundment or humane euthanasia. <strong>The</strong> ordinance also reinforces the provisionsfor keeping a vicious dog in city limits. <strong>The</strong> eight restricted breeds in Pilot Grove, MO: American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Bull Terrier, Staffordshire Terrier,Rottweiler, Doberman Pinscher, Chow Chow, Chinesischer Kampfhund (Chinese Shar Pei) To find out more about the ordinance, including what breeds are considered vicious, contact Pilot
- Page 2:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 6 and 7:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 8 and 9:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 10 and 11:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 12 and 13:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 14 and 15:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 16 and 17:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 18 and 19:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 20 and 21:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 22 and 23:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 24 and 25:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 26 and 27:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 28 and 29:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 30 and 31:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 32 and 33:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 34 and 35:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 36 and 37:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 38 and 39:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 40 and 41:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 42 and 43:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 44 and 45:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 46 and 47:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 48 and 49:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 50:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 53 and 54:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 55 and 56:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 57 and 58:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 59 and 60:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 61 and 62:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 63 and 64:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 65 and 66:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 67 and 68:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 69 and 70:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 71 and 72:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 73 and 74:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 75 and 76:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 77 and 78:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 79 and 80:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 81 and 82:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 83 and 84:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 85 and 86:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 87 and 88:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 89 and 90:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 91 and 92:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 93 and 94:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 95 and 96:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 97 and 98:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 99 and 100:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 101 and 102:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 103 and 104:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 105 and 106:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 107 and 108:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 109 and 110:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 111 and 112:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 113 and 114:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 115 and 116:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 117 and 118:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 119 and 120:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 121 and 122:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 123 and 124:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 125 and 126:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 127 and 128:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 129 and 130:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 131 and 132:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 133 and 134:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 135 and 136:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 137 and 138:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 139 and 140:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 141 and 142:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 143 and 144:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 145 and 146:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 147 and 148:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 149 and 150:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 151 and 152:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 153 and 154:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 155 and 156:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 157 and 158:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 159 and 160:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 161 and 162:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 163 and 164:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 165 and 166:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 167 and 168:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 169 and 170:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 171:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 174 and 175:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 176 and 177:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 178 and 179:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 180 and 181:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 182 and 183:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 184 and 185:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 186 and 187:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 188 and 189:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 190 and 191:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 192 and 193:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 194 and 195:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 196 and 197:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 198 and 199:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 200 and 201:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 202 and 203:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 204 and 205:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 206 and 207:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 208 and 209:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 210 and 211:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 212 and 213:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 214 and 215:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 216 and 217:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 218 and 219:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 220 and 221:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 222 and 223:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 224 and 225:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 226 and 227:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 228 and 229:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 230 and 231:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 232 and 233:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 234 and 235:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 236 and 237:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 238 and 239:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 240 and 241:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 242 and 243:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 244 and 245:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 246 and 247:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 248 and 249:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 250 and 251:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 252 and 253:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 254 and 255:
The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 256 and 257: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 258 and 259: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 260 and 261: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 262 and 263: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 264 and 265: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 266 and 267: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 268 and 269: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 270 and 271: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 272 and 273: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 274 and 275: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 276 and 277: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 278 and 279: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 280 and 281: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 282 and 283: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 284 and 285: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 286 and 287: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 288 and 289: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 290 and 291: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 292 and 293: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 294 and 295: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 296 and 297: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 298 and 299: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 300 and 301: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 302 and 303: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 304 and 305: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 308 and 309: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 310 and 311: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 312 and 313: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 314 and 315: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 316 and 317: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 318 and 319: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 320 and 321: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 322 and 323: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 324 and 325: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 326 and 327: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 328 and 329: The Monthly National Legislation Re
- Page 330: The Monthly National Legislation Re