attested by Fig. 2). Diversity in the weed flora results from differential patterns <strong>of</strong>flooding and drainage that selectively determine seed germination, seedling emergence,and survival. However, on poorly leveled fields with rain-dependent flooding to veryshallow depths, heterogeneous soil surfaces will <strong>of</strong>fer different depths <strong>of</strong> and duration<strong>of</strong> flooding, which will enhance diversity and potentially lead to similarity in the flora<strong>of</strong> transplanted and direct-seeded rice.Interspecific selection <strong>of</strong> known strongly competitive weeds <strong>of</strong> rice such asIschaemum rugosum and Echinochloa species is likely to occur with the serial use<strong>of</strong> direct seeding. Increased use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer to improve rice yield may influence thisprocess, although further scientific evidence is needed.The use <strong>of</strong> early postemergence herbicides that have broad-spectrum activitymay, however, lead to the subsequent dominance <strong>of</strong> rhizomatous or stoloniferousweeds (e.g., Cynodon dactylon, Paspalum distichum), which require close attentionin later manual weedingAlthough it is clear that the introduction <strong>of</strong> DSR into the Barind has significantyield and economic advantages for farmers, sustainability <strong>of</strong> the production systemwill depend upon an awareness <strong>of</strong> the responsiveness <strong>of</strong> the rice weed flora to bothcrop establishment and management practices. Strategies <strong>of</strong> weed management mustanticipate a change in target weed species against the background <strong>of</strong> high diversityand seasonal variation in the weed flora.Experience elsewhere suggests that, when diversification <strong>of</strong> herbicide mode <strong>of</strong>action occurs in the market place, there are consequential responses in target weedspecies. This will continue to place reliance on manual weeding.ReferencesAzmi M, Mortimer AM. 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> tillage practices, seeding rates and herbicides on barnyardgrassinfestation (Echinochloa crus-galli) in direct seeded rice. 17th Asian-PacificWeed Science Society Conference. 2:199-204.Brammer H. 1997. Agricultural development possibilities in Bangladesh. Dhaka: <strong>University</strong>Press Limited.Fujisaka S, Moody K, Ingram K.1993. A descriptive study <strong>of</strong> farming practices for dry seededrainfed lowland rice in India, Indonesia and Myanmar. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 45:115-128.Hill JE, Mortimer AM, Namuco OS, Janiya JD. 2001. Water and weed management in directseededrice: are we headed in the right direction? In: Peng S, Hardy B, editors. Riceresearch for food security and poverty alleviation. Los Baños (Philippines): InternationalRice Research Institute. p 491-510.Mazid MA, Jabber MA, Mortimer M, Wade LJ, Riches CR, Orr AW. 2003. Improving rice-basedcropping systems in north-west Bangladesh: diversification and weed management. TheBCPC International Congress, Crop Production and Protection. p 1029-1034.Mazid MA, Jabber MA, Riches CR, Robinson EJZ, Mortimer M, Wade LJ. 2001. Weed managementimplications <strong>of</strong> introducing dry-seeded rice in the Barind Tract <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh.Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the BCPC Conference – Weeds 2001. 1:211-216.Long-term sustainability in weed management for direct seeding <strong>of</strong> rainfed rice 77
Mazid MA, Riches CR, Mortimer AM, Wade LJ, Johnson DE. 2006. Improving rice basedcropping systems in north-west Bangladesh. 15th Australian Weeds Conference Proceedings.p 331-334.Moody K. 1996. Weed community dynamics. In: Naylor R, editor. Herbicides in Asian rice:transitions in weed management. Palo Alto, Calif. (USA): Institute for InternationalStudies, Stanford <strong>University</strong>, and Manila (Philippines): International Rice ResearchInstitute. p 27-35.Mortimer AM, Lubigan R, Piggin C. 1997. Constraints and opportunities for weed managementin rainfed lowland rice. Brighton Crop Protection Conference (1997). 2:191-196.Pandey S, Velasco L. 2002. Economics <strong>of</strong> direct-seeding in Asia: patterns <strong>of</strong> adoption andresearch priorities. In: Pandey S, Mortimer M, Wade L, Tuong TP, Lopez K, Hardy B,editors. Direct seeding: research strategies and opportunities. Los Baños (Philippines):International Rice Research Institute. p 3-14.Pane H, Noor ES, Dizon M, Mortimer AM. 2001. The weed communities <strong>of</strong> gogorancah riceand reflections on management. In: Tuong TP, Kam SP, Bouman B, Pandey S, Wade L,Hardy B, editors. Characterizing and understanding rainfed rice environments. Manila(Philippines): International Rice Research Institute. p 269-287.Rao A, Johnson DE, Sivaprasad B, Ladha JK, Mortimer AM. 2007. Weed management in directseeded rice. Adv. Agron. 93:153-255.Saleh AFM, Bhuiyan SI. 1995. Crop and rainwater management strategies for increasing productivity<strong>of</strong> rainfed lowland rice systems. Agric. Syst. 49:259-276.Singh G, Singh Y, Mishra OP, Singh VP, Singh RK, Johnson DE, Dizon M, Mortimer M. 2001.Changes in weed community structure in rice-wheat cropping systems in the Indo-Gangeticplains. British Crop Protection Conference – Weeds. 2:193-198.Singh G, Singh Y, Singh VP, Singh RK, Singh P, Johnson DE, Mortimer M, Orr A. 2003.Direct seeding as an alternative to transplanting rice for the rice-wheat systems <strong>of</strong> theIndo-Gangetic Plains: sustainability issues related to weed management. Proceedings<strong>of</strong> the BCPC International Congress on Crop Science and Technology, SECC, Glasgow,UK. p 1035-1040.Ulrich W, Ollik M. 2005. Limits to the estimation <strong>of</strong> species richness: the use <strong>of</strong> relative abundancedistribution. Divers. Distrib. 11:265-273.Wade LJ, Fukai S, Samson BK, Ali A, Mazid MA. 1999. Rainfed lowland rice: physical environmentand cultivar requirements. Field Crops Res. 64:3-13.NotesAuthors’ addresses: A.M. Mortimer, School <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Liverpool,Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK; M.A. Mazid, Bangaldesh Rice Research Institute, RegionalStation, Rangpur, Bangladesh; C.R. Riches, Natural Resources Institute, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Greenwich</strong>, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.Acknowledgments: This work was partially funded by the UK Department for InternationalDevelopment (Crop Protection Programme Project R8234). However, the views expressedare not necessarily those <strong>of</strong> DFID. The Consortium for Unfavorable Rice Environments,coordinated by the International Rice Research Institute, has also provided support. Weare grateful for discussion with J.D. Janiya, D.E. Johnson, B. Khamarker, R. Lubigan,and L.J. Wade. Soil nutrient analyses were conducted by the Soil Resource DevelopmentInstitute, Regional Laboratory, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.78 Mortimer et al
- Page 2:
Improving AgriculturalProductivity
- Page 5:
Bangladeshi experiences with a drum
- Page 8:
AcknowledgmentsIRRI is most gratefu
- Page 12 and 13:
The High Barind Tract: a challengin
- Page 14 and 15:
irrigation across the entire Barind
- Page 16:
Workshop synthesis
- Page 19 and 20:
and, with representatives from the
- Page 21 and 22:
Subsistence pressureLand pressure,
- Page 23 and 24:
HerbicidesEarlier efforts to introd
- Page 25 and 26:
volume). PVS is an effective way to
- Page 27 and 28:
Farmers may use wet-seeded DSR as a
- Page 29 and 30:
process and distributing HNPV to fa
- Page 31 and 32:
an NGO, have successfully collabora
- Page 34 and 35:
Workshop discussionParticipants dis
- Page 36 and 37: How can we identify a short-duratio
- Page 38 and 39: to fixed tenancy. The implication i
- Page 40: Opportunities for improving ricepro
- Page 43 and 44: that the reliability and productivi
- Page 45 and 46: Table 1. Planting dates, direct-see
- Page 47 and 48: Table 2. (A) Mean effect of fertili
- Page 49 and 50: Table 5. On-farm trials of a drum s
- Page 51 and 52: Upper toposequenceYield (t ha -1 )7
- Page 53 and 54: and perennial grasses (e.g., Ischae
- Page 56 and 57: Direct-seeded rice in the HighBarin
- Page 58: Table 1. Sample selection for costs
- Page 61 and 62: Table 4. Variations in weed managem
- Page 63 and 64: Table 7. Labor requirements (days h
- Page 65 and 66: Table 10. Farmer perceptions of dis
- Page 67 and 68: Farmers (no.)1412108DSRWet-seededDr
- Page 69 and 70: able commercially. Other OFT farmer
- Page 71: Box 1. Farmers’ comments on DSRPo
- Page 74: NotesAuthors’ addresses: M.A. Jab
- Page 78 and 79: This paper explores the role of som
- Page 80 and 81: (Olsen method, atomic absorption),
- Page 82 and 83: Mean biomass (g m −2 )1,000.000Fi
- Page 84 and 85: Fig. 3. Log rank abundance of weed
- Page 88 and 89: Bangladeshi experiences with a drum
- Page 90 and 91: Table 1. Grain yield and crop durat
- Page 92 and 93: Table 5. Grain yield and growth dur
- Page 94 and 95: ACEy = 0.0001x + 0.7089Yield (t ha
- Page 96 and 97: Table 11. Partial budget analysis f
- Page 98: ConclusionsDirect wet-seeded rice u
- Page 101 and 102: A 178% increase in rice production
- Page 103 and 104: Table 1. Components of yield gaps d
- Page 105 and 106: Table 3. Weed management in Comilla
- Page 107 and 108: Table 5. Weed management practices
- Page 109 and 110: Table 7. Significance (P H o ) of t
- Page 111 and 112: Since 2000, there has been an incre
- Page 114 and 115: Identifying varieties for the High
- Page 116 and 117: Table 1. Rice varieties bred by cli
- Page 118 and 119: Table 2. Grain yield advantage of J
- Page 120 and 121: Table 3. Plant height and crop dura
- Page 122 and 123: Table 6. Summary of adoption and sp
- Page 124 and 125: Freeman GH, Perkins J.M. 1971. Envi
- Page 126: Opportunities for improving rabi cr
- Page 129 and 130: Grain yield (t ha -1 )2.0npp1.5LSD
- Page 131 and 132: In each of the plots, numbers of He
- Page 133 and 134: Table 2. Effect of IPM components o
- Page 135 and 136: Unit plot size was 10 10 m and the
- Page 137 and 138:
Yield (t ha -1 )5Straw4321GrainP (g
- Page 139 and 140:
Nodulation score3AControl Soil Mo P
- Page 141 and 142:
even at low levels of production. B
- Page 144 and 145:
Integration of chickpea and other r
- Page 146 and 147:
Grain yield (t ha -1 )3.02.51989-99
- Page 148 and 149:
Improved Improved Rainfed rainfed C
- Page 150 and 151:
Table 1. Preharvest and postharvest
- Page 152 and 153:
Greater resistance to Helicoverpa p
- Page 154 and 155:
wheat varieties). There is also sco
- Page 156 and 157:
Developing seed systems fordissemin
- Page 158 and 159:
This paper describes attempts to em
- Page 160 and 161:
seed needed to attain the recommend
- Page 162 and 163:
introduced to permit sale beyond th
- Page 164:
pesticides, inoculation with benefi
- Page 168 and 169:
for the rabi crop in 2001. Hence, b
- Page 170:
where farmers decided not to relay-
- Page 174 and 175:
Table 2. Mean dates of T. aman harv
- Page 176 and 177:
Table 4. Subsistence pressure and r
- Page 178 and 179:
Table 7. Subsistence pressure and r
- Page 180 and 181:
cite the absence of rent as a facto
- Page 182 and 183:
abi cropping in the HBT through ear
- Page 184 and 185:
Formulation and dissemination ofimp
- Page 186 and 187:
in India, for which shorter-duratio
- Page 188 and 189:
Applied researchOFTsAdaptive resear
- Page 190 and 191:
Table 1. Recommended package of pra
- Page 192 and 193:
Table 2. Grain yields (kg ha -1 ) o
- Page 194 and 195:
Table 4. Grain yields (t ha -1 ) of
- Page 196 and 197:
Table 6. Mean grain yields (t ha -1
- Page 198:
constraints present. This in itself
- Page 202 and 203:
Extending rabi cropping in rice fal
- Page 204 and 205:
Table 1. Estimates of rice area dur
- Page 206 and 207:
Yield (kg ha -1 )1,2001,00080060040
- Page 208 and 209:
Future disseminationThrough dialogu
- Page 210 and 211:
Direct seeding of rice andopportuni
- Page 212 and 213:
Table 1. Time of establishment and
- Page 214 and 215:
Table 3. Weed density and biomass a
- Page 216 and 217:
than in Central Java and many farme
- Page 218 and 219:
Proportion abundance (log scale)Ran
- Page 220 and 221:
CAN FIELD BE DRAINED?YesCAN FIELD B
- Page 222 and 223:
Johnson DE, Mortimer AM. 2005. Issu
- Page 224:
Zhao DL, Atlin GN, Bastiaans L, Spi