de Swiet et al.CancerPregnancy does not alter the incidence or prognosis ofmost malignancies compared with similar cancers diagnosedat the same stage in nonpregnant women. Pregnancymay, however, accelerate the growth of some cancers, particularlythose which are hormone-dependent such as cancersof the breast and reproductive tract, or those whichoccur in the blood, brain or skin. Choriocarcinoma, ofwhich there were two reported cases this triennium, is theonly malignancy directly linked <strong>to</strong> pregnancy.Deaths from cancer and other tumours have had achapter <strong>to</strong> themselves in the last two Reports. As fewerCoincidental <strong>deaths</strong> were reviewed this triennium, and alsobecause the general lessons do not change very much, thelessons from these women have been included in thischapter for this Report. Earlier Reports contain muchmore detail on cancer in pregnancy and are still relevant<strong>to</strong>day.The Enquiry assessors considered the <strong>deaths</strong> of 14women who died of cancer during <strong>2006</strong>–08, the details ofwhich are shown in Table 10.2. The <strong>deaths</strong> of two womenwho died from choriocarcinoma were classified as Direc<strong>to</strong>r Late Direct and three related <strong>to</strong> hormone-dependenttumours were classified as Indirect. The case of a womanwho died from an infection related <strong>to</strong> cancer of the cervixis not counted here but is counted and discussed inChapter 7. The <strong>deaths</strong> of three women with longstandingbreast cancer before pregnancy were assessed <strong>to</strong> beCoincidental.For the first time in the continuing series of theseReports, the majority of the women reported <strong>to</strong> theEnquiry who died from cancer received a good, if notexcellent, standard of care. There was ample evidence ofTable 10.2. Numbers of assessed <strong>deaths</strong> from cancer or othertumours by type of <strong>maternal</strong> death; UK: <strong>2006</strong>–08*Site of cancer Direct Indirect Coincidental LateDirectTotalChoriocarcinoma 1 1 2Breast 2 3** 5Ovary 1 1Lung 2 2Gastrointestinal tract 3 3Unknown primary 1 1Total 1 3 9 1 14*Late Indirect and Late Coincidental <strong>deaths</strong> from cancer were notconsidered this triennium.**Although these tumours may be aggravated by pregnancy, inthese cases the assessors considered the <strong>deaths</strong> <strong>to</strong> be unrelated <strong>to</strong>pregnancy because they were already in an advanced state of diseasebefore pregnancy.joint care plans being developed with oncologists, paediatricians,anaesthetists and others and those who cared forthem gave sensitive statements <strong>to</strong> the Enquiry. From thecases assessed for this triennium, in only two could it besaid that the diagnosis was delayed, but in one by only afew days. In the other case however:A very young girl with a complex social his<strong>to</strong>ry was unwellfor a year or so with vomiting and severe loss of weight.Her symp<strong>to</strong>ms were ascribed <strong>to</strong> an eating disorder althoughshe did not seem <strong>to</strong> have been referred for psychiatric care.Early in her illness she attended the local EmergencyDepartment with a his<strong>to</strong>ry of vomiting, abdominal painand irregular periods and a positive pregnancy test wasoverlooked and not followed up. During the succeedingmonths, she repeatedly returned <strong>to</strong> the Emergency Departmentwith similar symp<strong>to</strong>ms but no pregnancy test was performed,perhaps because of her age. Her symp<strong>to</strong>ms wereeither ascribed <strong>to</strong> an eating disorder or gastritis. Nearly ayear after her positive pregnancy test she was admitted anddied of a cerebrovascular accident because of disseminatedchoriocarcinoma.The care this girl received was substandard in many ways.First, she was not <strong>to</strong>ld of her positive pregnancy test andit was not followed up. This was particularly importantbecause she was a very young and vulnerable girl whowould have needed intense support during her pregnancyin any event. The pregnancy test was never repeateddespite numerous attendances with similar symp<strong>to</strong>ms,which were always ascribed <strong>to</strong> an ‘eating disorder’although this diagnosis was never recorded in her GP’snotes nor had she received a psychiatric assessment.Numerous opportunities were missed <strong>to</strong> investigate hersymp<strong>to</strong>ms further although she did have an extremely rarecondition.Pathological commentaryThese Other Indirect <strong>deaths</strong> were very heterogeneous. Notall had au<strong>to</strong>psies and where the quality of the au<strong>to</strong>psyreport was deemed substandard there were the usual issuesof not taking enough or any samples for his<strong>to</strong>pathologyand not thinking through the diagnostic possibilities inherentin the death. As the Royal College of Pathologistsguidelines emphasise, consultation with relevant clinicianscan be invaluable in complex cases, and these au<strong>to</strong>psyreports contain little or no evidence of such deliberationstaking place. 8NeurologyEpilepsyOf the 14 women with epilepsy, all had au<strong>to</strong>psies, and thestandard overall was good, in that they addressed the criti-128 ª <strong>2011</strong> Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), BJOG 118 (Suppl. 1), 1–203
Chapter 10: Other Indirect <strong>deaths</strong>cal questions of alternative diagnoses <strong>to</strong> epilepsy, which isimportant in the case of SUDEP, and included ancillaryblood tests <strong>to</strong> identify anticonvulsant and other drugs. Thebasic mechanism of SUDEP is thought <strong>to</strong> be an arrhythmiaoccurring during an epileptic seizure, s<strong>to</strong>pping the heartbeat.Cerebral thrombosisAu<strong>to</strong>psies were performed in the minority of women withischaemic stroke because imaging pre-mortem usuallyidentifies the pathology. Thrombophilia was a fac<strong>to</strong>ralready known in one woman. The pathologist cannotidentify an inherited thrombophilic state post-mortembecause functional blood clotting tests cannot beperformed on au<strong>to</strong>psy blood. Genetic studies of DNA forknown prothrombotic conditions have not been validatedon au<strong>to</strong>psy material.Not all of the cases of stroke were aetiologically resolved.In one woman, who died of a thrombotic stroke in thepuerperium and did not have an au<strong>to</strong>psy, the diagnosiscould have been arterial occlusion, possibly from paradoxicalthromboembolism, sagittal sinus or cerebral veinthrombosis, or tuberculous meningitis. Obviously, knowingwhich was the case, would have informed clinical audit, aswell as categorising the case better as a Direct, Indirect orCoincidental death.Cerebral haemorrhageSubarachnoid haemorrhageOf the six women who died with a subarachnoid haemorrhage,only one had an au<strong>to</strong>psy. The others were diagnosedat CT scan and/or cranio<strong>to</strong>my, with the aneurysm identifiedalong with the subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage.With a confident clinical cause of death there wasno requirement for a medico-legal au<strong>to</strong>psy. The singleau<strong>to</strong>psy exemplifies some of the problems in specifying thecause of death when women present as ‘death in the community’:An obese woman collapsed in a car park <strong>to</strong>ward the end ofpregnancy and was dead on arrival at the EmergencyDepartment. Her booking blood pressure was 110/80 mmHg. The neuropathological au<strong>to</strong>psy found a rupturedberry aneurysm and subarachnoid haemorrhage; but theheart weighed 411 g, definitely enlarged with left ventricularhypertrophy. The kidney was not scrutinised for glomerularendotheliosis (the his<strong>to</strong>logical marker for pre-eclampsia), sothe questions regarding the underlying predisposition foraneurysm rupture remain open: was this essential hypertensiondespite the booking blood pressure, acute pre-eclampsiawith rise in blood pressure, obesity cardiomyopathy andcoincidental ruptured aneurysm or idiopathic left ventricularhypertrophy with ruptured aneurysm?InfectionThe women with apparently primary bacterial pneumoniaswere not well evaluated at au<strong>to</strong>psy apart from a womenwho died in her second trimester from staphylococcalpneumonia complicating type B influenza. For the otherwomen, no attempt at lung microbiology was made,which is disappointing given the importance of the epidemiologyof community-acquired pneumonia in this agegroup. In neither of the two HIV-positive women was acoronial au<strong>to</strong>psy necessary, but in one woman it was performed.However, the pathologist showed little insightin<strong>to</strong> the complex pathologies encountered in late-stageHIV disease, and the report would have helped neitherthe HIV doc<strong>to</strong>rs nor the obstetricians in their clinicalaudit.DiabetesAll the women who died of diabetic hypoglycaemia hadau<strong>to</strong>psies, which were not all well done. In two of thethree women the characteristic red neurone change inthe brain was not documented his<strong>to</strong>logically and nor werethe glucose and insulin levels measured in blood andvitreous fluids.The associated dead-in-bed syndrome is worth mentioningas a relatively new entity. The basic mechanism of SU-DEP is thought <strong>to</strong> be an arrhythmia occurring during anepileptic seizure, s<strong>to</strong>pping the heart beat. Similarly withunexplained <strong>deaths</strong> in diabetes, the so-called diabetic‘dead-in-bed syndrome’. This was documented twice in thistriennium in women who had been insulin-dependent diabeticsfor more than 10 years. For example:A woman with longstanding type 1 diabetes for many yearsand who had had many hypoglycaemic episodes, was founddead in bed in mid-pregnancy. The post-mortem biochemistryfor glucose and insulin was ambiguous, as is often thecase but the brain his<strong>to</strong>pathology showed hypoglycaemictypeneuronal necrosis. The diabe<strong>to</strong>logist consulted on thecase proposed the sudden nocturnal death in diabetes scenario,which comprises a diabetic au<strong>to</strong>nomic neuropathy,and a long QT interval—leading <strong>to</strong> fatal arrhythmia. 9 Significantlythis is not just hypoglycaemia causing death; hypoglycaemiais critically associated with cardiac electricalinstability.Liver diseaseTwo women died as a result of bleeding from cirrhoticportal hypertension. The <strong>deaths</strong> of two other womenhighlight how complicated medicine can be, because whatactually happened was not finally resolved despite goodau<strong>to</strong>psies. In a woman who had liver abscesses and peri<strong>to</strong>nitis,the route of infection was not ascertained, despiteª <strong>2011</strong> Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), BJOG 118 (Suppl. 1), 1–203 129
- Page 1:
Volume 118, Supplement 1, March 201
- Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementsSaving Mothers’ L
- Page 6 and 7:
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsCMA
- Page 8 and 9:
Forewordbeen written jointly by a m
- Page 10 and 11:
‘Top ten’ recommendationsServic
- Page 12 and 13:
‘Top ten’ recommendationscommun
- Page 14 and 15:
‘Top ten’ recommendationsof suc
- Page 16 and 17:
‘Top ten’ recommendationsMarch
- Page 18 and 19:
Oates et al.Back to basicsM Oates 1
- Page 20 and 21:
Oates et al.BreathlessnessBreathles
- Page 22 and 23:
Oates et al.appropriate pathway of
- Page 24 and 25:
LewisIntroduction: Aims, objectives
- Page 26 and 27:
LewisAn important limitation of ran
- Page 28 and 29:
Lewismaternal and public health-pol
- Page 30 and 31:
Lewisresult in a live birth at any
- Page 32 and 33:
LewisChapter 1: The women who died
- Page 34 and 35:
Lewiswho would not have been identi
- Page 36 and 37:
Lewis1098Rate per 100 000 materniti
- Page 38 and 39:
LewisTable 1.4. Numbers and rates o
- Page 40 and 41:
Lewis2.50Rate per 100 000 materniti
- Page 42 and 43:
LewisTable 1.9. Number of maternal
- Page 44 and 45:
LewisTable 1.12. Numbers and percen
- Page 46 and 47:
LewisThere were cases where a major
- Page 48 and 49:
LewisBox 1.5. Classifications of Bo
- Page 50 and 51:
LewisTable 1.20. Number and estimat
- Page 52 and 53:
LewisNew countries of the European
- Page 54 and 55:
LewisTable 1.23. Direct and Indirec
- Page 56 and 57:
LewisTable 1.26. Characteristics* o
- Page 58 and 59:
Lewis4 Lewis G (ed). The Confidenti
- Page 60 and 61:
DrifeTable 2.1. Direct deaths from
- Page 62 and 63:
Drifewomen who died in 2006-08 had
- Page 64 and 65:
Drifedelivery she became breathless
- Page 66 and 67:
DrifePathological overviewFourteen
- Page 68 and 69:
NeilsonChapter 3: Pre-eclampsia and
- Page 70 and 71:
Neilsontrue, and what might be the
- Page 72 and 73:
NeilsonConclusionThe number of deat
- Page 74 and 75:
NormanBackgroundIn the UK, major ob
- Page 76 and 77:
Normanwhich there was catastrophic
- Page 78 and 79:
Normanrecommendations made in succe
- Page 80 and 81: DawsonBox 5.1. The UK amniotic flui
- Page 82 and 83: Dawsontry despite an extensive sear
- Page 84 and 85: O’HerlihyTable 6.1. Numbers of Di
- Page 86 and 87: O’Herlihytoxic shock syndrome aft
- Page 88 and 89: HarperGroup A b-haemolytic streptoc
- Page 90 and 91: Harperthe 6-week postnatal period,
- Page 92 and 93: Harpera major intrapartum haemorrha
- Page 94 and 95: HarperBox 7.1. Signs and symptoms o
- Page 96 and 97: Harperwoman was given several litre
- Page 98 and 99: Harper2 Lamagni TL, Efstratiou A, D
- Page 100 and 101: LucasTable A7.1 Proposed new catego
- Page 102 and 103: Lucasthe same infection scenario as
- Page 104 and 105: McClure, CooperChapter 8: Anaesthes
- Page 106 and 107: McClure, Cooperaddress, but protoco
- Page 108 and 109: McClure, CooperPostpartum haemorrha
- Page 110 and 111: McClure, CooperWorkloadA number of
- Page 112 and 113: Nelson-PiercyTable 9.1. Indirect ma
- Page 114 and 115: Nelson-Piercynary arteries. In view
- Page 116 and 117: Nelson-Piercynormal left ventricle
- Page 118 and 119: LucasAnnex 9.1. Pathological overvi
- Page 120 and 121: Lucasdiac death that is non-ischaem
- Page 122 and 123: de Swiet et al.causes but are aggra
- Page 124 and 125: de Swiet et al.died of SUDEP before
- Page 126 and 127: de Swiet et al.for 6 weeks after de
- Page 128 and 129: de Swiet et al.mised. The obstetric
- Page 132 and 133: de Swiet et al.a thorough autopsy w
- Page 134 and 135: Oates, CantwellChapter 11: Deaths f
- Page 136 and 137: Oates, CantwellTable 11.1. Timing o
- Page 138 and 139: Oates, CantwellTable 11.5. Maternal
- Page 140 and 141: Oates, CantwellChild protection iss
- Page 142 and 143: Oates, CantwellAll women who are su
- Page 144 and 145: Oates, Cantwell4 Kendel RE, Chalmer
- Page 146 and 147: Lewismaternal mortality rates or ra
- Page 148 and 149: Annex 12.1. Domestic abuseAnnex 12.
- Page 150 and 151: Annex 12.1. Domestic abuseshe could
- Page 152 and 153: Garrod et al.supportive but challen
- Page 154 and 155: Garrod et al.• Culture and system
- Page 156 and 157: Garrod et al.the second stage and s
- Page 158 and 159: Garrod et al.through the still heal
- Page 160 and 161: ShakespeareChapter 14: General prac
- Page 162 and 163: Shakespeareemergency caesarean sect
- Page 164 and 165: ShakespeareCardiac diseaseDeaths fr
- Page 166 and 167: Shakespearereduce the risks to the
- Page 168 and 169: ShakespeareManaging a maternal deat
- Page 170 and 171: Hulbertin the ED was of a high qual
- Page 172 and 173: HulbertPre-eclampsia/eclampsia: lea
- Page 174 and 175: HulbertTransfersWhen the obstetric
- Page 176 and 177: Clutton-Brocksimply the case that s
- Page 178 and 179: Clutton-BrockDiagnosis of sepsisTak
- Page 180 and 181:
Clutton-Brockpulseless electrical a
- Page 182 and 183:
Clutton-BrockImprovement Scotland (
- Page 184 and 185:
Lucas, Millward-Sadler95 mmHg. This
- Page 186 and 187:
Lucas, Millward-Sadleran agreed mai
- Page 188 and 189:
Annex 17.1. The main clinico-tholog
- Page 190 and 191:
MillerAppendix 1: The method of Enq
- Page 192 and 193:
MillerDatanotificationNotificationR
- Page 194 and 195:
Knight• investigating different m
- Page 196 and 197:
Knightbaseline incidence against wh
- Page 198 and 199:
LennoxAppendix 2B: Summary of Scott
- Page 200 and 201:
LennoxEvidence of effective managem
- Page 202 and 203:
Appendix 3: Contributors to the Mat
- Page 204 and 205:
Appendix 3: Contributors to the Mat