Garrod et al.the second stage and suspected fetal compromise. She collapsedand died of a haemorrhage some hours later. Theonly mention of an interpreter was when the woman wasin extremis and the staff wished <strong>to</strong> explain events <strong>to</strong> herhusband.Basic observations and assessmentThere were many examples of failure <strong>to</strong> <strong>make</strong> or actupon basic observations. For instance, a woman with severalrisk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for pre-eclampsia arrived at hospital witha fully dilated cervix and promptly gave birth. She wasgiven Syn<strong>to</strong>metrine and, over the next few hours, wasobserved <strong>to</strong> have at least four abnormal features symp<strong>to</strong>maticof pre-eclampsia. These were not acted uponuntil she suffered a cerebral haemorrhage as a result anddied.Appropriate risk assessment must be performed for allwomen and risk status reviewed as necessary. For example:A morbidly obese woman with additional risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs forhypertension had neither obstetric nor anaesthetic review ineither pregnancy or labour and so had no plan for deliverycare. She was induced at term, having had prelabourrupture of membranes; the syn<strong>to</strong>cinon rate was increased,on the instruction of the senior midwife, when the cardio<strong>to</strong>cographwas already pathological. An emergency caesareansection was carried out for suspected fetal compromise, andthis was followed by a fatal postpartum haemorrhage.Another woman had a retained placenta following a normaldelivery. There seemed <strong>to</strong> be no appreciation of thechange in her risk status, which led <strong>to</strong> failure <strong>to</strong> performappropriate observations and moni<strong>to</strong>ring. It was severalhours before she was transferred <strong>to</strong> theatre. She suffered amassive haemorrhage and underwent a hysterec<strong>to</strong>my butdied.In these, and other cases, there seemed <strong>to</strong> be norecognition that a further risk assessment needed <strong>to</strong> bemade in the light of an unforeseen complication andthat delay in responding might exacerbate the woman’scondition.Recognition of risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs/signs of serious illnessand team workingWomen with risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs need clear multidisciplinary careplans for labour and birth. On occasion, midwives’ failure<strong>to</strong> call for senior medical help illustrated that this is associatedwith a lack of recognition of the seriousness of thecondition or with an inadequate response, including pooror no planning. For example:A woman with severe pre-eclampsia was admitted <strong>to</strong> thelabour ward by an Senior House Officer but was not seenby a registrar for some hours. Treatment eventually commencedbut was inadequate, and by the time a consultantwas involved (several hours after admission), the womanhad sustained an intracerebral haemorrhage. She died thefollowing day.The midwife should have escalated this woman’s referral<strong>to</strong> the consultant obstetrician.Staffing and SupervisionFor some women, documentation in case notes indicatedthat the unit was very busy. However, it was apparent inalmost every case that escalation policies were not activatedappropriately, including involvement of the Supervisor ofMidwives. 4 There were, however, some examples of exemplarypractice:A woman expecting her first baby was an inpatient at term;she collapsed and required resuscitation, during which anemergency caesarean was undertaken. Despite excellent care,she did not survive.The clinicians involved in this event responded in aprompt, efficient and energetic manner, and excellentteamwork was evident. The standard of the statement writingis such that a clear audit trail can be seen. In particular,there was thorough support from the Supervisor of Midwives,who was present for the emergency and alsoarranged extensive support for the midwives during thedays and weeks following.Postnatal careMidwives should be aware that the postnatal period ispotentially a time of higher risk than pregnancy or labour.As shown in Chapter 1, 63% of the 261 women who diedfrom Direct and Indirect causes did so following the birthof their babies. There is a concern that the growing reductionin the frequency of direct postnatal visits and the drive<strong>to</strong> replace direct contact with telephone communicationmay be leading <strong>to</strong> less than optimal care. This is a researchrecommendation in this Report.Getting the basics rightAssessment of the woman’s health and wellbeing willreduce the risk of the midwife focusing on emotional/mentalhealth issues that may be masking signs of physical illness.Having made an overall assessment of wellbeing, themidwife should ensure that basic observations are performedand recorded, acting on abnormal findings. Therewere examples in the report of midwives failing in thesebasic responsibilities, following both normal and operativedeliveries.154 ª <strong>2011</strong> Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE), BJOG 118 (Suppl. 1), 1–203
Chapter 13: MidwiferyBeware sepsisIt is of crucial importance for midwives <strong>to</strong> recognise thatthis Report identifies sepsis as the leading cause of Directmortality and <strong>to</strong> act on the ‘take home messages’ fromChapter 7. Despite the increase noted in this Report, sepsisremains a rare event, and addressing issues relating <strong>to</strong>sepsis is a challenge for midwives and for mothers. Thereis an urgent need for an awareness campaign for staff andparents, backed up by clear written information on thewarning signs and symp<strong>to</strong>ms for parents with instructionson what <strong>to</strong> do if they are concerned. Midwives must beaware of the potential sites of infection, including the genitaltract and the breast, and also that women with otherinfections (for example, a sore throat) are potentially atrisk of the infection becoming systemic.Carrying out basic care and observations is of essentialimportance, as is acting promptly on abnormal findings. Asa result of these repeated findings, a new section has beenadded <strong>to</strong> this Report, Back <strong>to</strong> basics, which should be readand acted on by all maternity staff. As an example of wherethis might have made a difference:A healthy young woman with a his<strong>to</strong>ry of normal birthshad a straightforward labour and birth at term. She wasdischarged from hospital the following day and receivedpostnatal visits from her midwife. Within the first week, ontwo occasions her midwife recorded that she was pyrexialand feeling unwell; she advised the woman <strong>to</strong> see her GP ifshe continued <strong>to</strong> feel ill. The midwife visited again 2 dayslater but did not <strong>make</strong> any basic observations. The followingday, the woman saw her GP, who referred her immediately<strong>to</strong> hospital where she was admitted with abdominalpain and septic shock. Her condition worsened rapidly, and,despite excellent inpatient care, she suffered complete organfailure and died shortly afterwards.As illustrated above, a previously healthy woman canunexpectedly become seriously ill and die extremelyquickly. The midwife did not follow up her abnormal findingswith a telephone call or visit the next day. When shedid visit again, she failed <strong>to</strong> <strong>make</strong> basic observations. Midwivesmust recognise signs of infection which are discussedin detail in both the new Back <strong>to</strong> basics section of thisReport and in Chapter 7, which are summarised in thelearning points Box 13.1.To reduce the risks of infection during the postnatal period,midwives and others should:• Take a full his<strong>to</strong>ry from a woman who has pyrexiaand feels unwell. Check if she or a family member hada sore throat. A ‘strep A throat’ can rapidly become ageneralised strep<strong>to</strong>coccus A infection. Midwives shouldbe aware of the potential for ‘mouth <strong>to</strong> genital tracttransmission’ and, for example, advise all women,including those who have, or whose close contactshave, a sore throat <strong>to</strong> adopt simple hygiene measuressuch as washing her hands before as well as after usingthe lava<strong>to</strong>ry and changing her sanitary pads.• Women should be given written information aboutwhat <strong>to</strong> expect in the postnatal period, <strong>to</strong>gether withwhat <strong>to</strong> look out for in terms of developing problems.This should include symp<strong>to</strong>ms of infection, of preeclampsiaand pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis.This information must also <strong>make</strong> clear who <strong>to</strong>contact for help and advice on a 24-hour basis.Air embolismIn most of the previous Reports of this Enquiry, as wellas in this one, a few <strong>deaths</strong> of women from air embolismfollowing sexual intercourse in the postnatal period havebeen reported. It is hypothesised that this is the result ofair being forced in<strong>to</strong> the mother’s circula<strong>to</strong>ry systemBox 13.1. Signs and symp<strong>to</strong>ms of sepsisPyrexia is common, but a normal temperature does not exclude sepsis.Paracetamol and other analgesics may mask pyrexia, and this should be taken in<strong>to</strong> account when assessing women who are unwell.Hypothermia is a significant finding that may indicate severe infection and should not be ignored.Swinging pyrexia and failure <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is suggestive of a persistent focus of infection or abscess.Persistent tachycardia >100 beats/minute is an important sign that may indicate serious underlying disease and should be fully investigated.Tachypnoea is sepsis until proved otherwise – persistently increased respira<strong>to</strong>ry rate >20 breaths/minute is a significant clinical finding that can alsoindicate other serious pathology, such as pulmonary oedema, pneumonia, thromboembolism or amniotic fluid embolism, and impending cardiacarrest.Neutropenia
- Page 1:
Volume 118, Supplement 1, March 201
- Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementsSaving Mothers’ L
- Page 6 and 7:
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsCMA
- Page 8 and 9:
Forewordbeen written jointly by a m
- Page 10 and 11:
‘Top ten’ recommendationsServic
- Page 12 and 13:
‘Top ten’ recommendationscommun
- Page 14 and 15:
‘Top ten’ recommendationsof suc
- Page 16 and 17:
‘Top ten’ recommendationsMarch
- Page 18 and 19:
Oates et al.Back to basicsM Oates 1
- Page 20 and 21:
Oates et al.BreathlessnessBreathles
- Page 22 and 23:
Oates et al.appropriate pathway of
- Page 24 and 25:
LewisIntroduction: Aims, objectives
- Page 26 and 27:
LewisAn important limitation of ran
- Page 28 and 29:
Lewismaternal and public health-pol
- Page 30 and 31:
Lewisresult in a live birth at any
- Page 32 and 33:
LewisChapter 1: The women who died
- Page 34 and 35:
Lewiswho would not have been identi
- Page 36 and 37:
Lewis1098Rate per 100 000 materniti
- Page 38 and 39:
LewisTable 1.4. Numbers and rates o
- Page 40 and 41:
Lewis2.50Rate per 100 000 materniti
- Page 42 and 43:
LewisTable 1.9. Number of maternal
- Page 44 and 45:
LewisTable 1.12. Numbers and percen
- Page 46 and 47:
LewisThere were cases where a major
- Page 48 and 49:
LewisBox 1.5. Classifications of Bo
- Page 50 and 51:
LewisTable 1.20. Number and estimat
- Page 52 and 53:
LewisNew countries of the European
- Page 54 and 55:
LewisTable 1.23. Direct and Indirec
- Page 56 and 57:
LewisTable 1.26. Characteristics* o
- Page 58 and 59:
Lewis4 Lewis G (ed). The Confidenti
- Page 60 and 61:
DrifeTable 2.1. Direct deaths from
- Page 62 and 63:
Drifewomen who died in 2006-08 had
- Page 64 and 65:
Drifedelivery she became breathless
- Page 66 and 67:
DrifePathological overviewFourteen
- Page 68 and 69:
NeilsonChapter 3: Pre-eclampsia and
- Page 70 and 71:
Neilsontrue, and what might be the
- Page 72 and 73:
NeilsonConclusionThe number of deat
- Page 74 and 75:
NormanBackgroundIn the UK, major ob
- Page 76 and 77:
Normanwhich there was catastrophic
- Page 78 and 79:
Normanrecommendations made in succe
- Page 80 and 81:
DawsonBox 5.1. The UK amniotic flui
- Page 82 and 83:
Dawsontry despite an extensive sear
- Page 84 and 85:
O’HerlihyTable 6.1. Numbers of Di
- Page 86 and 87:
O’Herlihytoxic shock syndrome aft
- Page 88 and 89:
HarperGroup A b-haemolytic streptoc
- Page 90 and 91:
Harperthe 6-week postnatal period,
- Page 92 and 93:
Harpera major intrapartum haemorrha
- Page 94 and 95:
HarperBox 7.1. Signs and symptoms o
- Page 96 and 97:
Harperwoman was given several litre
- Page 98 and 99:
Harper2 Lamagni TL, Efstratiou A, D
- Page 100 and 101:
LucasTable A7.1 Proposed new catego
- Page 102 and 103:
Lucasthe same infection scenario as
- Page 104 and 105:
McClure, CooperChapter 8: Anaesthes
- Page 106 and 107: McClure, Cooperaddress, but protoco
- Page 108 and 109: McClure, CooperPostpartum haemorrha
- Page 110 and 111: McClure, CooperWorkloadA number of
- Page 112 and 113: Nelson-PiercyTable 9.1. Indirect ma
- Page 114 and 115: Nelson-Piercynary arteries. In view
- Page 116 and 117: Nelson-Piercynormal left ventricle
- Page 118 and 119: LucasAnnex 9.1. Pathological overvi
- Page 120 and 121: Lucasdiac death that is non-ischaem
- Page 122 and 123: de Swiet et al.causes but are aggra
- Page 124 and 125: de Swiet et al.died of SUDEP before
- Page 126 and 127: de Swiet et al.for 6 weeks after de
- Page 128 and 129: de Swiet et al.mised. The obstetric
- Page 130 and 131: de Swiet et al.CancerPregnancy does
- Page 132 and 133: de Swiet et al.a thorough autopsy w
- Page 134 and 135: Oates, CantwellChapter 11: Deaths f
- Page 136 and 137: Oates, CantwellTable 11.1. Timing o
- Page 138 and 139: Oates, CantwellTable 11.5. Maternal
- Page 140 and 141: Oates, CantwellChild protection iss
- Page 142 and 143: Oates, CantwellAll women who are su
- Page 144 and 145: Oates, Cantwell4 Kendel RE, Chalmer
- Page 146 and 147: Lewismaternal mortality rates or ra
- Page 148 and 149: Annex 12.1. Domestic abuseAnnex 12.
- Page 150 and 151: Annex 12.1. Domestic abuseshe could
- Page 152 and 153: Garrod et al.supportive but challen
- Page 154 and 155: Garrod et al.• Culture and system
- Page 158 and 159: Garrod et al.through the still heal
- Page 160 and 161: ShakespeareChapter 14: General prac
- Page 162 and 163: Shakespeareemergency caesarean sect
- Page 164 and 165: ShakespeareCardiac diseaseDeaths fr
- Page 166 and 167: Shakespearereduce the risks to the
- Page 168 and 169: ShakespeareManaging a maternal deat
- Page 170 and 171: Hulbertin the ED was of a high qual
- Page 172 and 173: HulbertPre-eclampsia/eclampsia: lea
- Page 174 and 175: HulbertTransfersWhen the obstetric
- Page 176 and 177: Clutton-Brocksimply the case that s
- Page 178 and 179: Clutton-BrockDiagnosis of sepsisTak
- Page 180 and 181: Clutton-Brockpulseless electrical a
- Page 182 and 183: Clutton-BrockImprovement Scotland (
- Page 184 and 185: Lucas, Millward-Sadler95 mmHg. This
- Page 186 and 187: Lucas, Millward-Sadleran agreed mai
- Page 188 and 189: Annex 17.1. The main clinico-tholog
- Page 190 and 191: MillerAppendix 1: The method of Enq
- Page 192 and 193: MillerDatanotificationNotificationR
- Page 194 and 195: Knight• investigating different m
- Page 196 and 197: Knightbaseline incidence against wh
- Page 198 and 199: LennoxAppendix 2B: Summary of Scott
- Page 200 and 201: LennoxEvidence of effective managem
- Page 202 and 203: Appendix 3: Contributors to the Mat
- Page 204 and 205: Appendix 3: Contributors to the Mat