the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...
the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...
the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72 G. H. Ballantyne<br />
Series EGREGII = MUCRONATI/ANISACANTHI<br />
R. mucronatus Blox. = R. mucronulatus Boreau: Described as “frequent <strong>and</strong><br />
locally abundant” in West Perth, an assessment which applies to most of central<br />
Scotl<strong>and</strong> including parts of Stirlingshire; <strong>and</strong> also to <strong>the</strong> NE, where in some<br />
areas it is <strong>the</strong> sole bramble.<br />
R. melanoxylon Mueller & Wirtgen = R. furvicolor Focke: Rogers was very<br />
pleased to find this species <strong>and</strong> have it verified as part of <strong>the</strong> British bramble<br />
flora (along with R. drejeri). He gives a long account of <strong>the</strong> differences between<br />
it <strong>and</strong> allied taxa, <strong>and</strong> states that “I have no o<strong>the</strong>r British specimens that quite<br />
match <strong>the</strong> Scottish ones”, confirming <strong>the</strong> fact that it is endemic to Scotl<strong>and</strong>.<br />
However, not surprisingly, this bramble caused him much confusion, being<br />
collected under a variety of names: “macrophyllus sp.coll.”; “near pyramidalis”;<br />
“near mucronatus”; <strong>and</strong> “rosaceus”. R. furvicolor‘s stronghold is in <strong>the</strong> NE, with<br />
good populations also in <strong>the</strong> west central region centred on VC87 (West Perth),<br />
<strong>and</strong> occasionally in VC86 (Stirlingshire). The lectotype is a specimen from Loch<br />
Earn, collected by Rogers on his 1896 visit – but it should be noted that this is<br />
in VC88 (Mid Perth), not, as indicated in Edees & Newton (1988), following<br />
Rogers’ original error, in VC87.<br />
R. infestus Weihe: This was apparently observed by Rogers in several places.<br />
sometimes in quantity, but <strong>the</strong>re may have been confusion at times with <strong>the</strong><br />
next species, R. drejeri: at least one of his specimens is labelled “near infestus”<br />
when in fact it is drejeri. In 1998 R. infestus was seen only as a few plants on<br />
Call<strong>and</strong>er Crags, although it does certainly occur elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> general area.<br />
In Stirlingshire, Rogers “saw h<strong>and</strong>some bushes at Gargunnock <strong>and</strong> Stirling”<br />
(1897b), where it can still be found. This species is scattered throughout central<br />
<strong>and</strong> south Scotl<strong>and</strong>, coast to coast.<br />
R. drejeri G. Jensen. An extended note on <strong>the</strong> R. drejeri aggregate is given,<br />
beginning with <strong>the</strong> fact that a plant Rogers had seen two or three years<br />
previously <strong>and</strong> took to be R. drejeri had turned out to be his own R. leyanus. He<br />
goes on to give a detailed comparison of <strong>the</strong> two taxa <strong>and</strong> adds an account of<br />
a new variety, hibernicus, collected in Co. Down in 1894/5. He was gratified that<br />
Focke had named his mid-Scotl<strong>and</strong> specimens as R. drejeri, concluding his note<br />
with <strong>the</strong> declaration “The confident restoration to our British list of typical<br />
R. drejeri <strong>and</strong> its ally R. melanoxylon at <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> same part of<br />
Scotl<strong>and</strong> is remarkable”. Actually, this restoration of R. drejeri was doubted by<br />
Alan Newton during <strong>the</strong> 1970s (Newton, 1979). At that time, he had not seen<br />
any of Rogers’ specimens of it <strong>and</strong> it was not until August 1978 that he came<br />
across living bushes. I well remember his elation on realising that plants found<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Blairgowrie area (VC89, East Perth) were true R. drejeri, while, coincidentally,<br />
I was able to send him two examples from Fife (VC85) about <strong>the</strong><br />
same time. In 1896 Rogers had collected material in Perthshire from Lochs Earn<br />
<strong>and</strong> Venachar; 100 years on only one patch was seen, by <strong>the</strong> former locality –<br />
perhaps <strong>the</strong> same as that referred to under R. infestus. Rogers also collected it<br />
in Stirling where it is frequent. The species’ distribution in Britain is<br />
concentrated on east central Scotl<strong>and</strong>, with fur<strong>the</strong>r-flung outliers being found<br />
regularly.