the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...
the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...
the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Brambles of <strong>the</strong> Trossachs <strong>and</strong> Stirling 75<br />
1900, formed <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> first comprehensive Rubus list for Scotl<strong>and</strong>, issued<br />
a year or two later. This was compiled by Trail (1902-03), who acknowledges <strong>the</strong><br />
debt owed to Rogers, without whose records it could not have been made. This<br />
list, of course, has been much out of date for many years <strong>and</strong> is very badly in<br />
need of revision, a task for <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> new millennium. Interestingly,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are fewer than 70 named species (out of well over 300 on <strong>the</strong> British list)<br />
currently recorded from north of <strong>the</strong> Border, which is not many more than<br />
Rogers listed – although <strong>the</strong> determinations of many have changed of course<br />
<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs have been deleted.<br />
Without <strong>the</strong> assistance of Dr David Allen, this paper could not have been<br />
compiled. As well as giving advice, determining some of my finds <strong>and</strong><br />
commenting on <strong>and</strong> making corrections to <strong>the</strong> draft, he examined Rogers’<br />
specimens from his Scottish trip in <strong>the</strong> Natural History Museum (BM) <strong>and</strong> let<br />
me have details of both <strong>the</strong> original determinations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> comments of Focke<br />
<strong>and</strong> later experts. Few papers on British brambles could be written without <strong>the</strong><br />
help, direct or indirect, of Alan Newton <strong>and</strong> I am indebted to him also. Lindsay<br />
Corbett kindly furnished me a copy of Rogers (1897b).<br />
It should be noted that unattributed quotations throughout are taken from<br />
Rogers (1897a).<br />
References<br />
Edees, E. S. & Newton, A. (1988). Brambles of <strong>the</strong> British Isles. London, The Ray Society.<br />
Newton, A. (1979). Rubus drejeri G. Jensen in Scotl<strong>and</strong>. Watsonia 12; 342.<br />
Newton, A. (1980). Progress in British Rubus studies. Watsonia 13; 35-40.<br />
Rogers, W. M. (1897a). On some Scottish Rubi. J.Bot. 35; 42-50.<br />
Rogers, W. M. (1897b). Notes on Stirlingshire Rubi, 1896. Trans. Stirlingshire Nat. Hist. &<br />
Arch. Soc. 19; 107-110.<br />
Rogers, W. M. (1900). H<strong>and</strong>book of <strong>the</strong> British Rubi. London: Duckworth.<br />
Trail, J. W. H. (1902-03). Scottish Rubi. Annals of Scottish Natural History. 1902: 170-176,<br />
233-244; 1903: 41-47, 103-107.<br />
Watson, W. C. R. (1958). H<strong>and</strong>book of <strong>the</strong> Rubi of Great Britain <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>. Cambridge:<br />
Cambridge U. P.