22.11.2012 Views

the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...

the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...

the Forth Naturalist Historian - Forth Naturalist and Historian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Brambles of <strong>the</strong> Trossachs <strong>and</strong> Stirling 75<br />

1900, formed <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> first comprehensive Rubus list for Scotl<strong>and</strong>, issued<br />

a year or two later. This was compiled by Trail (1902-03), who acknowledges <strong>the</strong><br />

debt owed to Rogers, without whose records it could not have been made. This<br />

list, of course, has been much out of date for many years <strong>and</strong> is very badly in<br />

need of revision, a task for <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> new millennium. Interestingly,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are fewer than 70 named species (out of well over 300 on <strong>the</strong> British list)<br />

currently recorded from north of <strong>the</strong> Border, which is not many more than<br />

Rogers listed – although <strong>the</strong> determinations of many have changed of course<br />

<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs have been deleted.<br />

Without <strong>the</strong> assistance of Dr David Allen, this paper could not have been<br />

compiled. As well as giving advice, determining some of my finds <strong>and</strong><br />

commenting on <strong>and</strong> making corrections to <strong>the</strong> draft, he examined Rogers’<br />

specimens from his Scottish trip in <strong>the</strong> Natural History Museum (BM) <strong>and</strong> let<br />

me have details of both <strong>the</strong> original determinations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> comments of Focke<br />

<strong>and</strong> later experts. Few papers on British brambles could be written without <strong>the</strong><br />

help, direct or indirect, of Alan Newton <strong>and</strong> I am indebted to him also. Lindsay<br />

Corbett kindly furnished me a copy of Rogers (1897b).<br />

It should be noted that unattributed quotations throughout are taken from<br />

Rogers (1897a).<br />

References<br />

Edees, E. S. & Newton, A. (1988). Brambles of <strong>the</strong> British Isles. London, The Ray Society.<br />

Newton, A. (1979). Rubus drejeri G. Jensen in Scotl<strong>and</strong>. Watsonia 12; 342.<br />

Newton, A. (1980). Progress in British Rubus studies. Watsonia 13; 35-40.<br />

Rogers, W. M. (1897a). On some Scottish Rubi. J.Bot. 35; 42-50.<br />

Rogers, W. M. (1897b). Notes on Stirlingshire Rubi, 1896. Trans. Stirlingshire Nat. Hist. &<br />

Arch. Soc. 19; 107-110.<br />

Rogers, W. M. (1900). H<strong>and</strong>book of <strong>the</strong> British Rubi. London: Duckworth.<br />

Trail, J. W. H. (1902-03). Scottish Rubi. Annals of Scottish Natural History. 1902: 170-176,<br />

233-244; 1903: 41-47, 103-107.<br />

Watson, W. C. R. (1958). H<strong>and</strong>book of <strong>the</strong> Rubi of Great Britain <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge U. P.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!