Namibia country report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ABBREVIATIONSAALS Affirmative Action Loan SchemeACLRA Agricultural (Commercial) Land Reform Act 6 of 1995CBO community-based organisationFURS Farm Unit Resettlement SchemeLAC Legal Assistance CentreLISUP Livelihoods Support ProgrammeLRAC Land Reform Advisory CommissionLSU large-stock unitMAWF Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry (2005 onwards)MAWRD Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Development (1990-2005)MLR Ministry of Lands and Resettlement (2005 onwards)MLRR Ministry of Lands, Resettlement and Rehabilitation (1990-2005)NANGOF Namibian Non-governmental Organisations’ ForumNAU Namibia Agricultural UnionNDP National Development PlanNGO non-governmental organisationNNFU Namibia National Farmers UnionNPC National Planning CommissionNRC National Resettlement CommitteeNRP National Resettlement ProgrammeNUNW National Union of Namibian WorkersPLAN People’s Liberation Army of NamibiaPTT Permanent Technical Team on Land ReformRoN Republic of NamibiaRRC Regional Resettlement CommitteeRSA Republic of South AfricaSSU small-stock unitSWA South West AfricaSWAPO South West African People’s Organisation (political party)WSWB willing seller, willing buyer (model)Livelihoods after Land Reform: Namibia country report (2010) ● v
Page 2 and 3: © Land, Environment and Developmen
Page 4: Leading the Fieldis a publication o
Page 9: Background OnTHE STUDY ANDLAND REFO
Page 18 and 19: The upper bound poverty line of N$2
Page 20 and 21: Despite the Poverty Reduction Strat
Page 23 and 24: the land question did not occupy as
Page 25: pre-Independence gains of the minor
Page 29: In 1984 the SWA Agricultural Union
Page 33 and 34: projects. This is meant to be spent
Page 35: economy” (ibid.: 429). Economic a
Page 39 and 40: Farm plan for Tulpvlei resettlement
Page 43 and 44: capital investments and replacement
Page 45: 2.7 Beneficiary selection criteriaT
Page 48 and 49: 2.8 Land acquisition and allocation
Page 50 and 51: In view of these bottlenecks, and i
Page 52 and 53: The whole process of farm assessmen
Page 54 and 55: give regional and traditional leade
Page 56:
2.11 Frameworks for interaction bet
Page 60 and 61:
farming as their main source of hou
Page 62 and 63:
A list provided by Agribank in Octo
Page 68 and 69:
Kristof cut short his schooling on
Page 71 and 72:
Growing Hoodia at Sekretarispan res
Page 73 and 74:
Bernard, also a full-time farmer, s
Page 75:
comparison of his livestock numbers
Page 79 and 80:
Water infrastructure problems were
Page 81 and 82:
4.4.1 The ‘ideal’ trajectoryLiv
Page 83 and 84:
to the Ministry of Environment and
Page 85 and 86:
4.4.3 The ‘part-time’ trajector
Page 87 and 88:
An AALS farm in Hardap.In 1992 he a
Page 89:
start commercial farming that I did
Page 93 and 94:
5 FARM UNITRESETTLEMENTSCHEME (FURS
Page 95 and 96:
Table 11: Gender distribution of FU
Page 97 and 98:
A household on a resettlement farm
Page 99 and 100:
to improve her standard of living b
Page 102 and 103:
5.2 Production systems and output t
Page 104 and 105:
The 9 goat owners had herd sizes of
Page 106:
no calves at the time of the fieldw
Page 109 and 110:
units can have a net farm income of
Page 111 and 112:
Dilapidated water infrastructure at
Page 113 and 114:
female animals, beneficiaries were
Page 115 and 116:
Herman who farmed on a portion of S
Page 117 and 118:
our own property, we could at least
Page 120 and 121:
Interview with FURS beneficiaries i
Page 123 and 124:
farm. Consequently, the land alloca
Page 125 and 126:
a letter of motivation and a stock
Page 128 and 129:
Their own land enabled some to impr
Page 130 and 131:
operational costs on the farm. This
Page 132:
In 2002, however, when the Ministry
Page 135 and 136:
Beneficiaries at Bernafey.A benefic
Page 138 and 139:
Typical of this category of benefic
Page 140 and 141:
Albertina settled with her parents
Page 142:
son’s absence. She felt certain t
Page 145 and 146:
At Drimiopsis in Omaheke, two commu
Page 147 and 148:
Bernadine at Drimiopsis stated that
Page 149 and 150:
garden and planted for themselves,
Page 151 and 152:
the field visit, he had 28. He ascr
Page 155 and 156:
saw it as their right to accommodat
Page 157 and 158:
At Drimiopsis and Skoonheid, harves
Page 159:
activities. He did not know how he
Page 162 and 163:
Having no cash reserves, he often h
Page 164 and 165:
a shop from corrugated iron or bric
Page 166 and 167:
6.4 Livelihood trajectoriesFor the
Page 168 and 169:
monthly pensions and limited remitt
Page 170 and 171:
6.5 Evaluating outcomesDid access t
Page 172 and 173:
asset accumulation has to take plac
Page 174 and 175:
7 Rethinking ‘ViabiliTY’:Reflec
Page 176 and 177:
8 Policy ImplicationsThe purpose of
Page 178 and 179:
The current model needs reviewing a
Page 181 and 182:
stability, meaning that spouses and
Page 183 and 184:
8.7 Building capacityDeveloping and
Page 185 and 186:
Many resettlement projects are loca
Page 188 and 189:
Leys, C. and J. Saul (eds). 1995. N
Page 190 and 191:
South West Africa. n.d. [1966]. A F
Page 192:
Report produced for the Livelihoods
show all

Namibia country report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?