11.07.2015 Views

Tome Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Tome Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Tome Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 – High-Level <strong>and</strong> Long-Lived waste2.3.2 Number <strong>and</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> primary packages consideredIn the framework <strong>of</strong> the scenarios presented in section 2.1, the number <strong>of</strong> reference packages isquantified by the inventories <strong>and</strong> waste production forecasts established by producers <strong>and</strong> assessed by<strong>Andra</strong> based on data provided.For forthcoming waste, excluding spent fuel reprocessing, <strong>Andra</strong> has added dimensioning margins totake uncertainties into account. Note that disposal possibilities for some waste packages under otherdisposal solutions have not been taken into account so as to have cautious estimations available.For past production, inventories are based on data established by the producers. Inventories forreprocessing waste are deduced from the hypothetical electricity production by the facilities.The numbers <strong>and</strong> volumes <strong>of</strong> packages counted into the studies for B <strong>and</strong> C waste are presented inTable 2.3.2. The indicated volumes correspond to the conditioned waste volumes with the hypothesesformulated below.Table 2.3.2 Overall quantitative data, in number <strong>and</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> packages, for B <strong>and</strong> C wastereference packagesScenario S1a Scenario S1b Scenario S1c Scenario S2ReferenceProduction sitepackageNumber Volume Number Volume Number Volume Number Volume(m 3 )(m 3 )(m 3 )(m 3 )B1 EDF 2 560 470 2 560 470 2 560 470 2 560 470B2COGEMA La Hague 42 000 10 000 42 000 10 000 42 000 10 000 42 000 10 000COGEMA Marcoule 62 990 26 060 62 990 26 060 62 990 26 060 62 990 26 060Total <strong>of</strong> B2 104 990 36 060 104 990 36 060 104 990 36 060 104 990 36 060B3CEA 15 060 13 370 15 060 13 370 15 060 13 370 15 060 13 370COGEMA La Hague 9 890 10 470 9 890 10 470 9 890 10 470 7 340 7 750COGEMA Marcoule 7 990 3 420 7 990 3 420 7 990 3 420 7 990 3 420Total <strong>of</strong> B3 32 940 27 260 32 940 27 260 32 940 27 260 30 390 24 540B4 1 520 2 730 1 520 2 730 1 520 2 730 1 520 2 730COGEMA La HagueB542 600 7 790 39 900 7 300 39 900 7 300 13 600 2 490B6 COGEMA Marcoule 10 810 4 580 10 810 4 580 10 810 4 580 10 810 4 580B7 EDF CEA <strong>Andra</strong> 3 045 1 440 3 045 1 440 3 045 1 440 3 045 1 440B8 CEA <strong>Andra</strong> 1 350 775 1 350 775 1 350 775 1 350 775C0.1 CEA 180 10 180 10 180 10 180 10C0.2 COGEMA La Hague 800 140 800 140 800 140 800 140C0.3 COGEMA Marcoule 3 140 550 3 140 550 3 140 550 3 140 550Total <strong>of</strong> C0 4 120 700 4 120 700 4 120 700 4 120 700C1 4 640 810 4 640 810 38 350 6 710 4 640 810C2 990 170 27 460 4 810 0 0 5 920 1 040COGEMA La HagueC3 13 320 2 330 0 0 0 0 0 0C413 250 2 320 0 0 0 0 0 0Table 2.3.3 shows the state <strong>of</strong> existing B <strong>and</strong> C waste volumes at the end <strong>of</strong> 2003, whether or notconditioned <strong>and</strong> waste volumes still to be produced under scenario S1a.Dossier 2005 Granite - ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY27/228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!