11.07.2015 Views

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Soul of Martha a Beast 106the switch. “Candy Candy Thank you Belinsky Happy Happy Martha.”<strong>The</strong>n her voice stopped of its own accord. She stiffened, then relaxed in hermaster’s arms, dead.But brain death is not immediate. <strong>The</strong> final sensory discharge of some circuitwithin her inert body triggered a brief burst of neural pulsations decoded as “Hurt MarthaHurt Martha.”Nothing happened for another two seconds. <strong>The</strong>n randomly triggered neuraldischarges no longer having anything to do with the animal’s lifeless body sent one lastpulsating signal to the world of men.“Why Why Why Why -- “A soft electrical click stopped the testimony.ReflectionsAt the office in the morning and did business. By and by we arecalled to Sir. W. Battens to see the strange creature that CaptainHolmes hath brought with him from Guiny, it is a great baboone,but so much like a man in most things, that (though they say thereis a Species of them) yet I cannot believe but that it is a monstergot of a man and she-baboone. I do believe it already understandsmuch English, and I am o the mind it might be tought to speak ormake signs.--<strong>The</strong> Diary of Samuel PepysAugust 24 1661<strong>The</strong> pathetic noncomprehending cry of the dying chimp evokes in us powerful sympathy– we can identify so easily with this innocent and enchanting creature. What though, isthe plausibility of this scenario? Chimp language has been a controversial are for over adecade now. While it appears that these and other primates can absorb numerousvocabulary items – up to several hundred, in fact – and even on occasion come up withingenious compound words, it is far less well substantiated that they can absorb agrammar by which they can combine words into complex meaning-carrying propositions.It seems that chimps may simply use arbitrary juxtapositions of words rather thansyntactic structures. Is this a severe limitation? In the eyes of some it is, for it puts a strictupper bound to the complexity of ideas that can be expressed thereby. Noam Chomskyand others maintain that that which is essentially human is our

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!