11.07.2015 Views

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Coffeehouse Conversation 86a holdover image from the Industrial Revolution that sees machines as clunky ironcontraptions gawkily moving under the pressure of some loudly chugging engine.Possibly that’s even how the computer inventor Charles Babbage viewed people! Afterall, he called his magnificent many-geared computer the Analytical Engine.PAT: Well, I certainly don’t think people are just fancy steam shovels of even electriccan openers. <strong>The</strong>re’s something about people, something that – that they’ve got a sort offlame inside them, something alive, something that flickers unpredictably, wavering,uncertain – but something creative!SANDY: Great! That’s just the sort of thing I wanted to hear. It’s very human to thinkthat way. Your flame image makes me think of candles, of fires, of thunderstorms withlightning dancing all over the sky in crazy patterns. But do you realize that just that kindof pattern is visible on a computer’s console? <strong>The</strong> flickering lights form amazing chaoticsparkling patterns. It’s such a far cry from heaps of lifeless clanking metal! It isflamelike, by God! Why don’t you let the word “machine” conjure images of dancingpatterns of light rather than giant steam shovels?CHRIS: That’s a beautiful image, Sandy. It changes my sense of mechanism from beingmatter-oriented to being pattern-oriented. It makes me try to visualize the thoughts in mymind – these thoughts right now, even – as a huge spray of tiny pulses flickering in mybrain.SANDY: That’s quite a poetic self-portrait for a spray o flickers to have come up with!CHRIS: Thank you. But still, I’m not totally convinced that a machine is all that I am. Iadmit, my concept of machines probably does suffer from anachronistic subconsciousflavours, but I’m afraid I can’t change such a deeply rooted sense in a flash.SANDY: At least you do sound open minded. And to tell the truth, part of me doessympathize with the way you and pat view machines. Part of me balks at calling myself amachine. It is a bizarre thought that a feeling being like you or me might emerge frommere circuitry. Do I surprise you?CHRIS: You certainly surprise me. So tell us – do you believe in the idea of an intelligentcomputer, or don’t you?SANDY: it all depends on what you mean. We have all heard the question “Cancomputers think?” <strong>The</strong>re are several possible interpretations of this (aside from the manyinterpretations of the word “think”).86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!