11.07.2015 Views

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Selfish Genes and Selfish Memes 144crumble away. Elizabeth II is a direct descendant of William the Conqueror. Yet itis quite probable that she bears not a single one of the old king's genes. Weshould not seek immortality in reproduction.But if you contribute to the world's culture, if you have a good idea, compose atune, invent a spark plug, write a poem, it may live on, intact, long after yourgenes have dissolved in the common pool. Socrates may or may not have a geneor two alive in the world today, as G. C. Williams has remarked, but who cares?<strong>The</strong> meme-complexes of Socrates, Leonardo, Copernicus, and Marconi are stillgoing strong.ReflectionsDawkins is a master at expounding the reductionist thesis that says life and mindcome out of a seething molecular tumult, when small units, accidentally formed,are subjected over and over to the merciless filter of fierce competition forresources with which to replicate. Reductionism sees all of the world as reducibleto the laws of physics, with no room for so-called "emergent" properties or, touse an evocative though oldfashioned word, "entelechies"-higher-levelstructures that presumably cannot be explained by recourse to the laws thatgovern their parts.Imagine this scenario: You send your nonfunctioning typewriter (or washingmachine or photocopy machine) back to the factory for repair, and a month laterthey send it back reassembled correctly (as it had been when you sent it in),along with a note saying that they're sorry-all the parts check out fine, but thewhole simply doesn't work. This would be considered outrageous. How canevery part be perfect if the machine still doesn't work right? Something has to bewrong somewhere! So common sense tells us, in the macroscopic domain ofeveryday life.Does this principle continue to hold, however, as you go from a whole to itsparts, then from those parts to their parts, and so on, level after level? Commonsense would again say yes-and yet many people continue to believe such thingsas "You can't derive the properties of water from the properties of hydrogenand oxygen atoms" or "A living being is greater than the sum of its parts."Somehow people often envision atoms as simple billiard balls, perhaps withchemical valences but without much more detail. As it turns out, nothing couldbe further from the truth. When you get down to that very small size scale, themathemat

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!