11.07.2015 Views

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

Hofstadter, Dennett - The Mind's I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Is God a Taoist? 340I can see by your expression that you are simultaneously soothed andterrified by those words! What are you afraid of? That if in your mind youabolish the distinction between right and wrong you are more likely to commitacts which are wrong? What makes you so sure that self-consciousness aboutright and wrong does not in fact lead to more wrong acts than right ones? Do youhonestly believe that so-called amoral people, when it it comes to action ratherthan theory, behave less ethically than moralists? Of course not! Even mostmoralists acknowledge the ethical superiority of the behaviour of most of thosewho theoretically take an amoral position. <strong>The</strong>y seem so surprised that withoutethical principles these people behave so nicely! It never seems to occur to themthat it is by virtue of the very lack of moral principles that their good behaviourflows so freely.; Do the words “<strong>The</strong> conflict between right and wrong is thesickness of the human mind” express an idea so different from the story of theGarden of Eden and the fall of Man due to Adam’s eating of the fruit ofknowledge? This knowledge mind you, was of ethical principles, not ethicalfeelings – these Adam already had. <strong>The</strong>re is much truth in this story, though Inever commanded Adam not to eat the apple, I merely advised him not to. I toldhim it would not be good for him. If the damn fool had only listened to me, somuch trouble could have been avoided! But no, he thought he knew everything.”But I wish the theologists would finally learn that I am not punishing Adam andhis descendents for the act, but rather that the fruit in question is poisonous in it’sown right, and its effects, unfortunately, last countless generations.And now really I must take leave. I do hope that our discussion will dispelsome of your ethical morbidity, and replace it by a more naturalistic orientation.Remember also the marvelous words I once uttered through the mouth of Lao-Tse when I chided Confucious for his moralizing.All this talk of goodness and duty. <strong>The</strong>se perpetual pin-pricks unnerve and irritate thehearer – You had best study how it is that Heaven and Earth maintain their eternalcourse, that the sun and the moon maintain their light, the stars their serried ranks, thebirds and beasts their flocks, the trees and shrubs their station. This you too should learnto guide your steps toward Inward Power, to follow the course that the Way of Naturesets, and soon you will no longer need to go round laboriously advertising goodness, andduty. . . . <strong>The</strong> swan does not need a daily bath in order to remain white.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!