Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)S HOGAN RD 0.88 2 8.1 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -S HOGAN RD 2.31 2 8.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -S STATE ST 0.03 2 15.2 - Paved YES Poor - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D RepairS STATE ST 0.04 2 15.9 - Paved YES Poor - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D RepairS STATE ST 0.06 2 17.6 - Paved YES Poor - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D RepairS STATE ST 0.07 2 18.5 - Paved YES Poor - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D RepairS STATE ST 0.15 2 19.2 - Paved YES Poor - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D RepairS STATE ST 0.19 2 14.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D -S STATE ST 0.20 2 13.3 - Paved YES Poor - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D RepairSAINT PETERS RD 0.05 2 9.9 - Paved YES Fair 1601 NO Category III Rural Local Road D D -SAINT PETERS RD 0.35 2 9.5 - Paved NO Fair 1601 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -SAINT PETERS RD 0.61 2 9.8 - Paved YES Fair 1601 NO Category III Rural Local Road D D -SAINT PETERS RD 1.01 2 9.8 - Paved NO Fair 1601 YES Category III Rural Local Road D D -SALT FORK CT 0.04 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SALT FORK CT 0.07 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SALT FORK RD 0.09 2 11.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.09 2 9.2 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SALT FORK RD 0.10 2 10.4 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.11 2 10.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.14 2 8.9 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SALT FORK RD 0.15 2 9.9 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SALT FORK RD 0.15 2 11.3 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.21 2 10.3 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.22 2 10.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.34 2 11.0 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 0.44 2 10.2 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -SALT FORK RD 1.83 2 9.0 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SALT FORK RD 2.05 2 9.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SAMILL RD 0.98 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SAND RUN RD 0.99 2 9.5 1.6 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SANDSTONE DR 0.09 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SANDSTONE DR 0.13 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SANGAMAW RD 0.38 2 8.3 3.4 Paved YES Good 499 YES Category II Rural Local Road D D -SANGAMAW RD 0.43 2 7.9 1.8 Paved YES Good 499 YES Category II Rural Local Road D D -SANGAMAW RD 0.49 2 8.6 1.8 Paved YES Good 499 YES Category II Rural Local Road D D -SANGAMAW RD 0.87 2 7.8 - Paved YES Good 499 YES Category II Rural Local Road D D -SAPLING CT 0.04 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SAWDON RIDGE RD 0.19 2 8.4 - Paved NO Fair 1073 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -SAWDON RIDGE RD 0.24 2 8.4 - Paved NO Fair 1073 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -SAWDON RIDGE RD 0.37 2 9.1 - Paved NO Fair 1073 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -SAWDON RIDGE RD 0.79 2 8.8 - Paved NO Fair 1073 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -SAWDON RIDGE RD 0.95 2 9.1 - Paved YES Fair 1073 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -SAWDON RIDGE RD 1.53 2 8.1 - Paved NO Fair 1073 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -SCENIC DR 1.84 2 9.7 2.6 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D A -SCHAEFER RD 0.94 2 7.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHAICH RD 0.70 2 6.0 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededSCHANTZ RD 1.00 2 7.1 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHANTZ RD 1.01 2 6.3 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairSCHLEMNER CT 0.04 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHMALTZ RD 0.19 2 6.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 19 of 31
Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)SCHMALTZ RD 1.48 2 8.3 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHUMAN RD 0.40 2 10.8 1.2 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road A D -SCHUMAN RD 0.50 2 14.5 6.9 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road A A -SCHUSTER RD 0.28 2 6.6 1.5 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHWIER RD 0.10 2 4.7 - Unpaved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHWIER RD 0.52 2 5.9 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHWIER RD 0.54 2 4.9 - Both NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SCHWIPP RD 0.32 2 7.3 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededSCHWIPP RD 0.51 2 8.2 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededSCHWIPP RD 0.53 2 9.2 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairSEFTAN LN 0.21 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SELDOM SEEN DR 0.10 2 6.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SELDOM SEEN DR 0.13 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SELDOM SEEN DR 0.14 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SELDOM SEEN DR 0.14 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SELDOM SEEN DR 0.22 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SEQUOTA CT 0.02 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SERENITY RIDGE DR 0.07 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SERENITY RIDGE DR 0.25 2 10.0 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D RepairSHADOW DR 0.07 2 22.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SHADOW DR 0.10 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHADY LANE CT 0.11 2 8.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHADY LN 0.31 2 9.6 1.2 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHANGRILA DR 0.06 1 14.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SHANGRILA DR 0.06 1 14.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SHANGRILA DR 0.07 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHANGRILA DR 0.11 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHARON DR 0.26 2 9.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHARON DR 0.43 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHAWNEE DR 0.07 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SHERMAN DR 0.13 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHORT HILL AVE 0.23 2 17.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SHORT RD 0.34 2 8.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHORT RIDGE RD 2.89 2 9.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SHUTER RD 1.00 2 6.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SIEFFERMAN CT 0.10 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SIEFFERMAN RD 0.51 2 13.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SMOKEY MOUNTAIN DR 0.10 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -SMOKEY MOUNTAIN DR 0.26 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.07 2 9.0 - Paved YES Fair 594 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.08 2 7.7 - Paved NO Good 594 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.11 2 9.5 - Paved NO Fair 594 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.13 2 7.7 - Paved NO Good 594 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.19 2 9.5 - Paved NO Fair 594 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.69 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good 594 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -SNEAKVILLE RD 0.96 2 9.0 - Paved NO Fair 594 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -SOAP HILL RD 0.48 2 9.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SOAP HILL RD 0.48 2 9.3 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SOAP HILL RD 1.53 2 8.6 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -SOAPSTONE DR 0.04 2 10.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 20 of 31
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52:
Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 53 and 54:
Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 55 and 56: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 66 and 67: Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69: Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73: 3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75: CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77: Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79: the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81: ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83: Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87: 5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139: Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 140 and 141: York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 142 and 143: York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145: Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147: Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149: Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151: Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153: Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155: Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157:
Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?