Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment factor, fG 1.00PCE for trucks, ET 1.1PCE for RVs, ER 1.0Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0.998Two-way flow rate,(note-1) vp 70 pc/hHighest directional split proportion (note-2) 57Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 6.0 %Adj.for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 34.6Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 40.6 %________________Level of Service and Other Performance Measures_______________Level of service, LOSBVolume to capacity ratio, v/c 0.02Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 128 veh-miPeak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT60 457 veh-miPeak 15-min total travel time, TT15 3.4 veh-h______________________________________________________________________________Notes:1. If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F.2. If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminateanalysis-the LOS is F.Page 2
York Ridge2.txtHCS2000: Two-Lane Highways Release 4.1dPhone:E-Mail:Fax:___________________Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis__________________AnalystSteve BrinckAgency/Co.Parsons BrinckerhoffDate Performed 08/21/03Analysis Time PeriodHighwayYork RidgeFrom/ToJurisdictionAnalysis Year 2030Description Existing Roads with Future Traffic Volumes___________________________________Input Data_________________________________Highway class Class 2Shoulder width 0.0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89Lane width 9.0 ft % Trucks and buses 2 %Segment length 7.4 mi % Recreational vehicles 4 %Terrain type Level % No-passing zones 100 %Grade: Length mi Access points/mi 26 /miUp/down %Two-way hourly volume, V 93 veh/hDirectional split 81 / 19 %____________________________Average Travel Speed______________________________Grade adjustment factor, fG 1.00PCE for trucks, ET 1.7PCE for RVs, ER 1.0Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0.986Two-way flow rate,(note-1) vp 106 pc/hHighest directional split proportion (note-2) 86 pc/hFree-Flow Speed from Field Measurement:Field measured speed, SFM 40 mi/hObserved volume, Vf 0 veh/hEstimated Free-Flow Speed:Base free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/hAdj. for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/hAdj. for access points, fA - mi/hFree-flow speed, FFS 40.0 mi/hAdjustment for no-passing zones, fnp 1.9 mi/hAverage travel speed, ATS 37.3 mi/h__________________________Percent Time-Spent-Following________________________Page 1
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52:
Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69:
Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73:
3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75:
CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77:
Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79:
the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81:
ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83:
Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87:
5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139: Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 142 and 143: York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145: Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147: Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149: Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151: Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153: Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155: Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157: Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159: N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161: N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?