Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)BRIARWOOD DR 0.23 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIARWOOD DR 0.67 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHT LEAF DR 0.08 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHT LEAF DR 0.09 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHT LEAF DR 0.15 2 19.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIGHT RIDGE CT 0.05 2 20.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIGHT RIDGE DR 0.13 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHT RIDGE DR 0.14 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIGHTLAND CT 0.12 2 10.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIGHTLAND DR 0.16 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHTLAND DR 0.22 2 9.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHTWOOD DR 0.06 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHTWOOD DR 0.09 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIGHTWOOD DR 0.13 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIGHTWOOD DR 0.14 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIGHTWOOD DR 0.46 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BROADRIDGE DR 0.24 2 19.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BROOKS RD 0.32 1 11.9 0.0 Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D Paving NeededBROOKS RD 0.45 2 9.0 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BROOKS RD 1.86 2 9.0 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BROWN RD 0.07 1 9.1 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBROWN RD 0.37 2 6.0 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBRUCE HILL RD 0.84 2 5.4 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRUSH FORK RD 0.22 2 10.3 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Urban Local Road D D -BRUSH FORK RD 2.08 2 5.2 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Urban Local Road D D Paving NeededBULACH DR 1.87 2 5.6 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BUNKUM RD 0.27 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BURNS RD 0.27 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BURNS RD 0.55 2 7.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BURTZELBACH RD 2.89 2 10.3 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector A D -BUSINESS CENTER DR 0.12 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BUSSE LN 0.08 2 5.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BUTLER CT 0.09 2 13.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BUTLER DR 0.08 2 13.3 1.1 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BUTLER DR 0.24 2 13.3 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CADES CT 0.07 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CAMBRIDGE RD 0.10 2 4.9 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairCAMBRIDGE RD 0.28 2 5.5 - Both NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CAMPGROUND DR 0.21 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CAMPO VERDE DR 0.23 2 21.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CAROLINA TRACE RD 0.04 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CAROLINA TRACE RD 0.15 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CAROLINA TRACE RD 0.25 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CARR RD 0.04 2 8.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CARR RD 0.09 2 9.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CARR RD 0.12 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CARR RD 0.15 2 8.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CARR RD 0.15 2 9.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CARR RD 0.15 2 20.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CARR RD 0.63 2 8.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 3 of 31
Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)CARRIE DR 0.26 1 8.4 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairCASTLETINE RD 0.61 2 6.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CEDAR CREEK DR 0.03 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CEDAR CREEK DR 0.39 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CEDAR RIDGE DR 0.09 2 9.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CENTER ST 0.04 2 12.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Urban Local Road A D -CENTRAL DR 1.00 2 8.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPIN RD 1.28 2 6.9 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededCHAPPELOW HILL RD 0.30 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW HILL RD 0.46 2 8.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW HILL RD 0.52 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.10 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.13 2 7.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.16 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.19 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.32 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.35 2 8.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.44 2 8.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHAPPELOW RIDGE RD 0.64 2 8.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHATHAM RD 1.32 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.05 2 9.1 - Paved YES Fair 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.16 2 9.1 0.8 Paved NO Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.18 2 10.2 - Paved YES Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.32 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.41 2 9.6 - Paved YES Good 684 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.48 2 9.7 - Paved YES Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.51 2 10.4 - Paved YES Good 684 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.59 2 9.6 0.6 Paved YES Fair 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.61 2 9.1 - Paved YES Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.63 2 10.3 - Paved YES Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.63 2 9.7 - Paved YES Good 684 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.80 2 10.5 - Paved NO Good 684 NO Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 0.81 2 9.5 0.6 Paved YES Fair 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 1.05 2 9.1 0.5 Paved NO Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHESTERVILLE RD 1.76 2 8.9 - Paved YES Good 684 YES Category II Rural Collector D D -CHIPMAN RD 0.48 2 5.8 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairCHURCH LN 0.62 2 8.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHURCH LN 0.77 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CHURCH RD 0.64 2 7.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CLAY MILLER RD 1.00 2 7.0 1.8 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -COCHRAN ST 0.05 2 4.9 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Urban Local Road D D -COLD SPRINGS RD 0.64 2 9.3 3.3 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D A -COLD SPRINGS RD 1.01 2 9.1 0.8 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -COLE LN 0.05 2 10.2 0.9 Paved YES Good 2970 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -COLE LN 0.11 2 11.6 6.5 Paved NO Fair 2970 YES Category III Rural Collector A A -COLE LN 0.16 2 9.8 - Paved YES Good 2970 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -COLE LN 0.21 2 7.1 - Paved NO Poor 2970 NO Category III Rural Collector D D RepairCOLE LN 0.59 2 10.7 2.2 Paved NO Good 2970 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -COLE LN 0.60 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good 2970 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -COLE LN 0.96 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good 2970 NO Category III Rural Collector D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 4 of 31
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40: StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 49 and 50: 2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 66 and 67: Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69: Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73: 3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75: CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77: Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79: the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81: ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83: Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87: 5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139: Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 140 and 141:
York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 142 and 143:
York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145:
Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147:
Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151:
Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153:
Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157:
Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?