Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)YORKRIDGE RD 0.34 2 9.4059 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -YORKRIDGE RD 0.66 2 10.4839 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -YORKRIDGE RD 0.67 2 10.2177 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -YORKRIDGE RD 0.68 2 9.8823 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -YORKRIDGE RD 1.13 2 9.2594 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -YORKRIDGE RD 1.25 2 9.55495 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -YORKRIDGE RD 2.26 2 10.0213 - Paved YES Good 1499 YES Category III Rural Collector D D -ZIEGLER BLVD 0.08 2 24.2854 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -ZIMMER RD 0.47 2 7.63815 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ZINSER RD 0.10 2 8.37603 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -649.89 mi(Repair/PavingNeeded)Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 31 of 31
Cole Ln.txtHCS2000: Two-Lane Highways Release 4.1dPhone:E-Mail:Fax:___________________Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis__________________AnalystSteve BrinckAgency/Co.Parsons BrinckerhoffDate Performed 08/21/03Analysis Time PeriodHighwayCole LnFrom/ToJurisdictionAnalysis Year 2003Description___________________________________Input Data_________________________________Highway class Class 2Shoulder width 0.0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92Lane width 9.0 ft % Trucks and buses 2 %Segment length 2.7 mi % Recreational vehicles 4 %Terrain type Rolling % No-passing zones 100 %Grade: Length mi Access points/mi 29 /miUp/down %Two-way hourly volume, V 124 veh/hDirectional split 66 / 34 %____________________________Average Travel Speed______________________________Grade adjustment factor, fG 0.71PCE for trucks, ET 2.5PCE for RVs, ER 1.1Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0.967Two-way flow rate,(note-1) vp 196 pc/hHighest directional split proportion (note-2) 129 pc/hFree-Flow Speed from Field Measurement:Field measured speed, SFM 40 mi/hObserved volume, Vf 0 veh/hEstimated Free-Flow Speed:Base free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/hAdj. for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/hAdj. for access points, fA - mi/hFree-flow speed, FFS 40.0 mi/hAdjustment for no-passing zones, fnp 3.4 mi/hAverage travel speed, ATS 35.0 mi/h__________________________Percent Time-Spent-Following________________________Page 1
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52:
Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69: Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73: 3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75: CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77: Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79: the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81: ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83: Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87: 5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 88 and 89: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139: Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 140 and 141: York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 142 and 143: York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145: Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147: Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149: Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151: Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153: Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155: Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157: Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159: N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161: N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?