Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)3 MILE RDG 0.17 2 12.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -ACCESS RD 0.19 2 5.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -AKES HILL RD 0.03 2 7.4 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairAKES RD 0.31 2 6.8 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairALANS BRANCH RD 0.15 2 10.1 1.0 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road A D -ALANS BRANCH RD 0.45 2 5.7 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ALBERTA DR 0.11 2 9.4 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -AMITY DR 0.14 2 10.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -AMM RD 0.96 2 8.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ANDERSON RD 0.31 2 6.2 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededANDREW CT 0.09 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -APPALACHIA DR 0.07 2 10.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -APPALACHIA DR 0.09 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -APPLE CT 0.05 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ARLINGTON RD 1.19 2 8.1 2.9 Paved YES Fair 359 YES Category I Rural Collector D A -ARLINGTON RD 2.16 2 9.5 1.2 Paved YES Good 359 YES Category I Rural Collector D D -ASCHE RD 0.10 2 8.7 - Both NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -ASCHE RD 0.40 2 8.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -ASCHE RD 0.62 2 8.4 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -ASCHE RD 1.09 2 8.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -ATLANTIC AVE 0.06 2 10.9 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D Paving NeededATLANTIC AVE 0.07 2 11.2 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D RepairAUTUMN WAY DR 0.29 2 19.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BANBERRY CT 0.03 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BANBERRY CT 0.08 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BANBERRY CT 0.12 2 9.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BANBERRY DR 0.10 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BARBER RD 0.15 2 8.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BARBER RD 0.86 2 7.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BARBER RD 1.06 2 8.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BARBER RD 1.50 2 8.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BARRETT RD 0.43 2 8.1 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BARTH RD 0.66 2 7.6 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BASKET LN 0.05 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BASKET LN 0.07 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BASKET LN 0.07 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BATEMAN DR 0.08 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BATEMAN DR 0.08 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BATH RD 0.25 2 8.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BATTA RD 0.49 2 7.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BAUM HOLLOW RD 0.62 2 8.4 1.8 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BEATTY RD 0.04 2 8.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BEATTY RD 0.04 2 9.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BEATTY RD 0.04 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BEATTY RD 0.89 2 10.2 7.8 Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A A -BEATTY RD 1.09 2 8.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELL ARBOR RD 0.19 2 7.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELL ARBOR RD 0.47 2 7.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLEMEADE CT 0.09 2 8.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLEMEADE DR 0.17 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 1 of 31
Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)BELLS BRANCH RD 0.24 2 7.2 2.0 Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLS BRANCH RD 0.25 2 9.0 1.5 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLS BRANCH RD 0.36 2 8.6 1.9 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLS BRANCH RD 0.40 2 9.1 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLS BRANCH RD 0.50 2 9.3 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLS BRANCH RD 0.56 2 8.3 2.0 Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BELLS BRANCH RD 1.13 2 8.9 2.0 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -BENEDICT DR 0.09 2 12.4 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D -BENEKER RD 0.60 2 7.8 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBENNING RD 0.75 2 7.9 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BERKSHIRE DR 0.33 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BESS DR 0.07 2 8.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BIG WATER CT 0.08 2 8.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BIHR RD 0.42 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BIRCH ST 0.04 2 14.1 3.3 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Urban Local Road A D -BISCHOFF HILL RD 0.15 2 9.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BISCHOFF HILL RD 0.98 2 8.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BISCHOFF HILL RD 1.04 2 8.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BITTNER RD 0.62 2 7.0 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBLASDEL DR 0.09 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BLASDEL DR 0.20 2 8.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BLOOM RD 2.13 2 6.7 1.3 Both NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BLUE CREEK RD 0.46 2 7.4 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -BLUE CREEK RD 0.54 2 8.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -BLUE CREEK RD 1.12 2 13.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category II Rural Local Road A D -BLUE GOOSE RD 0.53 2 7.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BLUE RIDGE CT 0.06 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BLUE RIDGE DR 0.13 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BLUE RIDGE DR 0.16 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BLUE RIDGE DR 0.16 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BLUE RIDGE DR 0.17 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BOARDWALK DR 0.06 2 9.0 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBOCOCK RD 0.78 2 5.6 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BOND RD 0.18 2 9.0 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -BOND RD 0.78 2 9.5 - Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Collector D D -BONNELL RD 0.01 2 6.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Collector D D -BONNELL RD 0.37 2 11.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Collector A D -BONNELL RD 0.54 2 8.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Collector D D -BONNELL RD 0.65 2 6.8 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Collector D D -BONNELL RD 0.67 2 7.2 - Both NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Collector D D -BONNELL RD 1.27 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category II Rural Collector D D -BONNELL RD 1.67 2 10.1 - Both NO Poor - NO Category II Rural Collector D D Paving NeededBOWER RD 0.48 2 7.7 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBOYD RD 0.36 2 6.1 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairBOYD RD 0.94 2 6.3 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRANDT RD 0.29 2 6.0 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIAR RIDGE DR 0.10 2 9.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIARWAY CT 0.04 2 10.8 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -BRIARWAY CT 0.29 2 9.4 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -BRIARWAY NORTH DR 0.28 2 8.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 2 of 31
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38: StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 49 and 50: 2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 66 and 67: Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69: Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73: 3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75: CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77: Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79: the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81: ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83: Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87: 5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139:
Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 140 and 141:
York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 142 and 143:
York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145:
Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147:
Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151:
Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153:
Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157:
Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?