Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)COLLIER RIDGE RD 0.49 2 8.9 1.7 Paved YES Good 362 YES Category I Rural Collector D D -COLLIER RIDGE RD 0.82 2 9.2 - Paved YES Good 362 YES Category I Rural Collector D D -COLLIER RIDGE RD 2.15 2 7.9 - Paved YES Good 362 YES Category I Rural Collector D D -COLORADO DR 0.07 2 10.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -COLORADO DR 0.18 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CONCORD SQUARE DR 0.08 2 8.9 2.1 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D A -COOK RD 1.58 2 6.0 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededCOPPERFIELD CT 0.08 1 14.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -COPPERFIELD CT 0.08 1 13.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CORA DR 0.02 2 13.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CORA DR 0.11 2 7.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CORA RD 0.09 2 8.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CORNETT RD 0.13 1 8.7 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairCOSBY DR 0.18 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -COUNTRY CLUB RD 0.11 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -COUNTRY HILLS DR 0.02 2 10.3 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D RepairCOUNTRY HILLS DR 0.52 2 8.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -COUNTY FARM RD 0.91 2 8.4 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -COUNTY FARM RD 2.21 2 9.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CRANES RUN RD 0.72 2 5.7 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairCRAVENHURST DR 0.27 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CREEKSIDE DR 0.14 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CRESCENT DR 0.12 2 9.6 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -CROSS RD 2.11 2 8.5 2.8 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road D A -CUMBERLAND CT 0.04 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CUMBERLAND DR 0.14 2 10.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CUMBERLAND DR 0.15 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CUMBERLAND DR 0.34 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -CUTTER RD 1.63 2 7.3 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DAKOTA DR 0.14 2 11.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -DAKOTA DR 0.19 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -DARLING RD 0.04 1 7.9 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DAVIDSON RD 0.35 2 8.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DAVIES RD 1.64 2 7.9 1.4 Paved NO Good - NO Category II Rural Local Road D D -DAWN PAUL DR 0.08 2 9.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DEAN RD 0.41 2 6.7 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairDEER RUN DR 0.09 2 9.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DEHILL DR 0.10 2 9.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DENNIS RD 0.28 1 8.8 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairDENNIS RD 0.36 2 5.6 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DENRIDGE CT 0.25 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -DEWITT RD 0.26 2 4.8 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairDIEFENBACH RD 0.14 2 7.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DIEFENBACH RD 0.19 2 8.0 2.4 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D A -DIEHL DR 0.05 2 15.9 3.6 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Urban Local Road A D -DISBRO RD 0.35 2 6.0 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededDITTMER RD 0.32 2 5.8 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOCKERY RD 0.53 2 22.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -DOG RD 0.47 2 8.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOG RD 0.50 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 5 of 31
Dearborn County Transportation AssessmentGeometrics Pavement Conditions FunctionRoadway Functional ClassificationDeficienciesStreetLength ofSegment# ofLanesLaneWidthShoulderWidthPavementTypePavementMarkingsPavementConditionAverage DailyTrafficSchool BusRouteLane WidthShoulderWidthPavement Condition(mi) (ft) (ft) (yes/no) (yes/no) (Category & Sub-Category)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Deficient/Acceptable)(Repair/PavingNeeded)DOG RD 1.27 2 6.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOGWOOD CT 0.17 2 9.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOLE RD 0.14 2 8.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOLE RD 0.24 2 5.2 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOLE RD 0.29 2 8.7 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DOUGHTY RD 0.35 2 11.9 - Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D RepairDOUGLAS DR 0.16 2 10.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -DUNEVANT DR 0.05 2 16.3 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -DUNEVANT DR 0.07 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUNEVANT DR 0.09 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUNEVANT DR 0.19 2 9.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUNEVANT DR 0.26 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.09 2 8.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.14 2 9.7 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.28 2 9.0 0.3 Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D RepairDUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.30 2 8.8 0.8 Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.31 2 9.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.37 2 9.0 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 0.56 2 9.1 0.7 Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -DUTCH HOLLOW RD 1.22 2 9.4 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -E FORK RD 0.30 2 4.4 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 0.03 2 14.3 3.8 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road A A -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 0.20 2 10.3 2.5 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road A A -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 0.20 2 11.3 1.1 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road A D -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 0.51 2 8.5 2.7 Paved YES Good - YES Category I Rural Local Road D A -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 1.62 2 9.1 1.5 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 1.72 2 8.7 2.2 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road D A -E LAUGHERY CREEK RD 2.39 2 8.8 0.9 Paved YES Fair - YES Category I Rural Local Road D D -E MAIN ST 0.46 2 10.1 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -EARL CT 0.06 2 8.5 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -EAST DR 0.14 2 22.1 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -EASY WAY DR 0.14 2 10.0 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -EASY WAY DR 0.23 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -EINSEL RD 0.05 2 7.5 3.0 Paved NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D A RepairEINSEL RD 0.11 2 9.9 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -EINSEL RD 0.13 2 6.8 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -EINSEL RD 0.19 2 7.4 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ELAM RD 0.17 1 10.0 - Unpaved NO Poor - NO Category II Rural Collector D D RepairELAM RD 0.33 2 6.9 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category II Rural Collector D D -ELIZABETH DR 0.60 2 11.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -ELLINGHAUSEN RD 1.47 2 7.6 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ELM CIRCLE DR 0.21 2 23.8 - Paved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -ENNIS RIDGE RD 2.06 2 7.3 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededESSEX LN 0.06 2 10.2 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road A D -ESSEX LN 0.13 2 8.5 - Paved NO Good - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ESTER JAMES LAKE RD 0.99 2 9.4 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededESTER RIDGE RD 0.26 2 9.3 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededESTER RIDGE RD 0.28 2 9.0 - Both NO Poor - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D Paving NeededESTER RIDGE RD 0.33 2 8.6 - Unpaved NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -ESTER RIDGE RD 0.50 2 8.9 - Both NO Fair - NO Category I Rural Local Road D D -Dearborn CountyTransportation AssessmentAppendix APage 6 of 31
Page 1 and 2:
Dearborn CountyTransportationAssess
Page 3 and 4:
5.3 TRAFFIC COUNT RECOMMENDATIONS .
Page 5 and 6:
ChapterONEEXISTING CONDITIONS1.1 ST
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1-1 - Study Area MapDearborn
Page 9 and 10:
DillsboroThe town of Dillsboro was
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.2 EmploymentTable 1B - Study Ar
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.3 EconomicsTotalHouseholdsMedia
Page 15 and 16:
State Route 1SR 1 travels north-sou
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1-5 - 2001 Annual Average Da
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.2 Intermodal Transportation Opt
Page 21 and 22:
1.6 REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIESNumero
Page 23 and 24:
to US 50. The new roadway will be a
Page 25 and 26:
urban boundary will need to be upda
Page 27 and 28:
Table 2C - Local Roadway Sub-Catego
Page 29 and 30:
Street1ST ST2ND ST3 MILE RDG3RD ST4
Page 31 and 32:
StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42: StreetCategory& Sub-CategoryStreetC
Page 49 and 50: 2.3 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMP
Page 51 and 52: Dearborn County Transportation Asse
Page 66 and 67: Figure 3-1 - Pavement TypeDearborn
Page 68 and 69: Lane & Shoulder Width DeficienciesE
Page 70 and 71: Figure 3-3 - Shoulder Width Deficie
Page 72 and 73: 3.5 GUARDRAIL INVENTORYThe length a
Page 74 and 75: CHAPTERFOURSELECTED ROADWAYCAPACITY
Page 76 and 77: Table 4B - Level of Service and Vol
Page 78 and 79: the community. Before undertaking a
Page 80 and 81: ChapterFIVERECOMMENDATIONS5.1 ANALY
Page 82 and 83: Figure 5-1 - Arterial Roadways Reco
Page 84 and 85: Figure 5-3 - Local Roadways Recomme
Page 86 and 87: 5.4 TYPICAL COSTSWhen planning for
Page 120 and 121: Cole Ln.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 122 and 123: Cole Ln2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 124 and 125: Jamison.txtGrade adjustment factor,
Page 126 and 127: Jamison2.txtGrade adjustment factor
Page 128 and 129: N Dearborn.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 130 and 131: N Dearborn2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 132 and 133: State Line Rd.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 134 and 135: State Line Rd2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 136 and 137: Wilsons Creek.txtGrade adjustment f
Page 138 and 139: Wilsons Creek2.txtGrade adjustment
Page 140 and 141: York Ridge.txtGrade adjustment fact
Page 142 and 143:
York Ridge2.txtGrade adjustment fac
Page 144 and 145:
Cole Lane State Line Wilson Creek Y
Page 146 and 147:
Cole Ln. - Category III Rural Colle
Page 148 and 149:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 150 and 151:
Curve No. PVC PVT PVC Milepoint PVT
Page 152 and 153:
Wilson Creek Rd. - Category IV Rura
Page 154 and 155:
Curve No. PC PT PC Milepoint PT Mil
Page 156 and 157:
Jamison Rd. - Category IV Rural Art
Page 158 and 159:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
Page 160 and 161:
N. Dearborn Rd. - Category II Rural
show all

Dearborn County Transportation Assessment Complete ... - OKI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?